Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T00:33:34.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language and tool making are similar cognitive processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2012

Ralph L. Holloway
Ralph L. Holloway
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027. rlh2@columbia.eduhttp://www.columbia.edu/~rlh2
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Design features for language and stone toolmaking (not tool use) involve similar if not homologous cognitive processes. Both are arbitrary transformations of internal “intrinsic” symbolization, whereas non-human tool using is mostly an iconic transformation. The major discontinuity between humans and non-humans (chimpanzees) is language. The presence of stone tools made to standardized patterns suggests communicative and social control skills that involved language.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , August 2012 , pp. 226
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hockett, C. F. (1960) The origin of speech. Scientific American 203:88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holloway, R. (1969) Culture: A human domain. Current Anthropology 10(4):395–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holloway, R. L. (1967) The evolution of the human brain: Some notes toward a synthesis between neural structure and the evolution of complex behavior. General Systems 12:3–19.Google Scholar
Holloway, R. L. (1975) The role of human social behavior in the evolution of the brain. (43rd James Arthur Lecture. American Museum of Natural History, 1973).Google Scholar
Holloway, R. L. (1981) Culture, symbols, and human brain evolution: A synthesis. Dialectical Anthropology 5:287–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holloway, R. L. (1996) Evolution of the human brain. In: Handbook of symbolic evolution, ed. Lock, A. & Peters, C., pp. 74–116 (chap. 4). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holloway, R. L., Yuan, M. S. & Broadfield, D. C. (2004) Brain endocasts: Paleoneurological evidence, vol. 3, In the human fossil record, ed. Schwartz, J. & Tattersall, I.. John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. A., Gallanter, E. & Pribram, K. H. (1960) Plans and the structure of behavior. Holt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schick, K. & Toth, N. (1993) Making silent stones speak: Human evolution and the dawn of technology. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Stout, D., Toth, N. & Schick, K. (2010) Understanding Oldowan knapping skill: An experimental study of skill acquisition in modern humans. In: The cutting edge: New approaches to the archaeology of human origins, ed. Schick, K. & Toth, N., pp. 207–65. Stone Age Institute Press.Google Scholar
Stout, D., Toth, N., Schick, K. & Chaminade, T. (2009) Neural correlates of Early Stone Age toolmaking: technology, language and cognition in human evolution. In: The sapient mind: Archaeology meets neuroscience, ed. Renfrew, C., Frith, C. & Malafouris, L., pp. 1–19. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Toth, N. & Schick, K. (2010) Hominin brain reorganization, technological change, and cognitive complexity. In: The human brain evolving: Paleoneurological studies in honor of Ralph L. Holloway, ed. Broadfield, D. C., Yuan, M., Schick, K. & Toth, N., pp. 293–312. (chap. 19). Stone Age Institute Press.Google Scholar