No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Bio-culturally grounded: why separation and connection may not be the same around the world
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 February 2021
Abstract
Central to the account of grounded procedures is the premise that mental experiences are grounded in physical actions. We complement this account by incorporating frameworks in cultural psychology and developmental neuroscience, with new predictions. Through the examples of vicarious experiences and demerit transfer, we discuss why, and how, separation and connection may operate somewhat differently across cultures.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Bond, M. H., & Cheung, T. S. (1983). College students’ spontaneous self-concept: The effect of culture among respondents in Hong Kong, Japan, and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 14(2), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002183014002002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esposito, G., Setoh, P., & Bornstein, M. H. (2015). Beyond practices and values: Toward a physio-bioecological analysis of sleeping arrangements in early infancy. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 264. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esposito, G., Setoh, P., Shinohara, K., & Bornstein, M. H. (2017a). The development of attachment: Integrating genes, brain, behavior, and environment. Behavioral Brain Research, 87–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esposito, G., Truzzi, A., Setoh, P., Putnick, D. L., Shinohara, K., & Bornstein, M. H. (2017b). Genetic predispositions and parental bonding interact to shape adults’ physiological responses to social distress. Behavioral Brain Research, 125, 156–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2017.03.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. W. S., & Schwarz, N. (2010a). Washing away postdecisional dissonance. Science (New York, N.Y.), 328, 709. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1186799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lickel, B., Schmader, T., Curtis, M., Scarnier, M., & Ames, D. R. (2005). Vicarious shame and guilt. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8(2), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430205051064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marriott, M. (1989). Constructing an Indian ethnosociology. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 23(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/006996689023001003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savani, K., Kumar, S., Naidu, N. V. R., & Dweck, C. S. (2011). Beliefs about emotional residue: The idea that emotions leave a trace in the physical environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(4), 684–701. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stipek, D. (1998). Differences between Americans and Chinese in the circumstances evoking pride, shame, and guilt. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 29(5), 616–629. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022198295002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triandis, H. C., McCusker, C., & Hui, C. H. (1990). Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 1006–1020. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, A. J., Zwick, R., & Schwarz, N. (2012). Washing away your (good or bad) luck: Physical cleansing affects risk-taking behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 26–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023997.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhong, C. B., & Liljenquist, K. (2006). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science (New York, N.Y.), 313(5792), 1451–1452. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1130726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Target article
Grounded procedures: A proximate mechanism for the psychology of cleansing and other physical actions
Related commentaries (27)
A not-so proximate account of cleansing behavior
Bio-culturally grounded: why separation and connection may not be the same around the world
Body ownership as a proxy for individual and social separation and connection
Cleansing and separating: From modern agriculture and genocide to post-separation era
Cleansing and separation procedures reflect resource concerns
Considerations of the proximate mechanisms and ultimate functions of disgust will improve our understanding of cleansing effects
Cultural mindsets shape what grounded procedures mean: Cleansing can separate or connect and separating can feel good or not so good
Culture, ecology, and grounded procedures
Developmental antecedents of cleansing effects: Evidence against domain-generality
From washing hands to washing consciences and polishing reputations
Going beyond elementary mechanisms: the strategic interplay between grounded procedures
Grounded procedures of connection are not created equal
Grounded procedures of separation in clinical psychology: what's to be expected?
Grounded separation: can the sensorimotor be grounded in the symbolic?
Grounding together: Shared reality and cleansing practices
Incomplete grounding: the theory of symbolic separation is contradicted by pervasive stability in attitudes and behavior
It's a matter of (executive) load: Separation as a load-dependent resetting procedure
Leveraging individual differences to understand grounded procedures
Proper understanding of grounded procedures of separation needs a dual inheritance approach
Psychology of cleansing through the prism of intersecting object histories
Separation/connection procedures: From cleansing behavior to numerical cognition
Specifying separation: avoidance, abstraction, openness to new experiences
The impact of grounded procedures can vary as a function of perceived thought validity, meaning, and timing
The lack of robust evidence for cleansing effects
The role of goal-generalization processes in the effects of grounded procedures
The role of meta-analysis and preregistration in assessing the evidence for cleansing effects
The role of mortality concerns in separation and connection effects: comment on Lee and Schwarz
Author response
Grounded procedures in mind and society