Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:32:53.396Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Going beyond elementary mechanisms: the strategic interplay between grounded procedures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2021

Peter Kardos Open the ORCID record for Peter Kardos [Opens in a new window]
Peter Kardos*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Bloomfield College, Bloomfield, NJ07003.peter_kardos@bloomfield.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The model presented by Lee and Schwarz provides a novel explanation for the elementary mechanisms of psychological cleansing. I argue that the model could be extended to account for complex instances of psychological cleansing where the grounded procedures are not isolated and the opposing motives of separation and connection are entangled in a strategic interplay.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 44 , 2021 , e11
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bloom, P. (2010). How pleasure works: The new science of why we like what we like (1st ed.). W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Kardos, P., & Castano, E. (2012). Money doesn't stink. Or does it? The effect of immorally acquiring money on its spending. Current Psychology, 31, 381–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levav, J., & McGraw, A. P. (2009). Emotional accounting: How feelings about money influence consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 66–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, M. (2002). Money laundering and its regulation. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 582, 181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemeroff, C., & Rozin, P. (1994). The contagion concept in adult thinking in the United States: Transmission of germs and of interpersonal influence. Ethos (Berkeley, Calif. ), 22(2), 158–186. https://doi.org/10.1525/eth.1994.22.2.02a00020.Google Scholar
Rozin, P. (2008). Hedonic “adaptation”: Specific habituation to disgust/death elicitors as a result of dissecting a cadaver. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 191–194.Google Scholar
Stellar, J. E., & Willer, R. (2014). The corruption of value: Negative moral associations diminish the value of money. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 5, 60–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tasimi, A., & Gelman, S. A. (2017). Dirty money: The role of moral history in economic judgments. Cognitive Science, 41, 523–544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tasimi, A., & Gross, J. J. (2020). The dilemma of dirty money. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(1), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419884315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar