No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Evidence for partner choice in toddlers: Considering the breadth of other-oriented behaviours
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 February 2013
Abstract
When do humans become moral beings? This commentary draws on developmental psychology theory to expand the understanding of early moral behaviours. We argue that by looking at a broader range of other-oriented acts than what has been considered by Baumard et al., we can find support for the mutualistic approach to morality even in early instances of other-oriented behaviours.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013
References
Bernhard, H., Fischbacher, U. & Fehr, E. (2006) Parochial altruism in humans. Nature 442(7105):912–15.Google Scholar
Blake, P. R. & Rand, D. G. (2010) Currency value moderates equity preference among young children. Evolution and Human Behaviour 31(3):210–18. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.06.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownell, C., Svetlova, M. & Nichols, S. (2009) To share or not to share: When do toddlers respond to another's needs? Infancy 14:117–30.Google Scholar
Dunfield, K. A. & Kuhlmeier, V. A. (2010) Intention-mediated selective helping in infancy. Psychological Science 21(4):523–27.Google Scholar
Dunfield, K. A. & Kuhlmeier, V. A. (in press) Classifying prosocial behavior: Helping, sharing, and comforting subtypes. Child Development.Google Scholar
Dunfield, K. A., Kuhlmeier, V. A., O'Connell, L. J. & Kelley, E. A. (2010) Examining the diversity of prosocial behaviour: Helping, sharing, and comforting in infancy. Infancy 16:227–47.Google Scholar
Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K. & Bloom, P. (2007) Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature 450(7169):557–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hay, D. F. & Cook., K. V. (2007) The transformation of prosocial behavior from infancy to childhood. In: Socioemotional development in the toddler years: Transitions & transformations, ed. Brownell, C. A. & Kopp, C. B., pp. 100–31. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kuhlmeier, V. A., Wynn, K. & Bloom, P. (2003) Attribution of dispositional states by 12-month-olds. Psychological Science 14(5):402–408.Google Scholar
Svetlova, M., Nichols, S. R. & Brownell, C. A. (2010) Toddlers' prosocial behavior: From instrumental to empathic to altruistic helping. Child Development 81:1814–27.Google Scholar
Vaish, A., Carpenter, M. & Tomasello, M. (2010). Young children selectively avoid helping people with harmful intentions. Child Development 81:1661–69.Google Scholar
Warneken, F. & Tomasello, M. (2006) Altruistic helping in human infants and young chimpanzees. Science 311:1301–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warneken, F. & Tomasello, M. (2009b) Varieties of altruism in children and chimpanzees. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13:397–402.Google Scholar
Zahn-Waxler, C., Radke-Yarrow, M., Wagner, E. & Chapman, M. (1992) Development of concerns for others. Developmental Psychology 28:1038–47.Google Scholar
Target article
A mutualistic approach to morality: The evolution of fairness by partner choice
Related commentaries (28)
A strange(r) analysis of morality: A consideration of relational context and the broader literature is needed
Bargaining power and the evolution of un-fair, non-mutualistic moral norms
Baumard et al.'s moral markets lack market dynamics
Beyond economic games: A mutualistic approach to the rest of moral life
Biological evolution and behavioral evolution: Two approaches to altruism
Can mutualistic morality predict how individuals deal with benefits they did not deserve?
Competitive morality
Cooperation and fairness depend on self-regulation
Disentangling the sense of ownership from the sense of fairness
Does market competition explain fairness?
Ego function of morality and developing tensions that are “within”
Evidence for partner choice in toddlers: Considering the breadth of other-oriented behaviours
From mutualism to moral transcendence
From partner choice to equity – and beyond?
Heterogeneity in fairness views: A challenge to the mutualistic approach?
Intertemporal bargaining predicts moral behavior, even in anonymous, one-shot economic games1
Modeling justice as a natural phenomenon
More to morality than mutualism: Consistent contributors exist and they can inspire costly generosity in others
Mutualism is only a part of human morality
Non-mutualistic morality
Not all mutualism is fair, and not all fairness is mutualistic
Partner selection, coordination games, and group selection
Sense of fairness: Not by itself a moral sense and not a foundation of a lot of morality
The emotional shape of our moral life: Anger-related emotions and mutualistic anthropology
The paradox of the missing function: How similar is moral mutualism to biofunctional understanding?
You can't have it both ways: What is the relation between morality and fairness?
Your theory of the evolution of morality depends upon your theory of morality
“Fair” outcomes without morality in cleaner wrasse mutualism
Author response
Partner choice, fairness, and the extension of morality