Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:29:23.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exploring some edges: Chunk-and-Pass processing at the very beginning, across representations, and on to action

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2016

Rose Maier  and
Dare Baldwin
Rose Maier
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403. rosem@uoregon.edubaldwin@uoregon.edu
Dare Baldwin
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403. rosem@uoregon.edubaldwin@uoregon.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We identify three “working edges” for fruitful elaboration of the Chunk-and-Pass proposal: (a) accounting for the earliest phases of language acquisition, (b) explaining diversity in the stability and plasticity of different representational types, and (c) propelling investigation of action processing.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 39 , 2016 , e85
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bortfeld, H., Morgan, J. L., Golinkoff, R. M. & Rathbun, K. (2005) Mommy and me: Familiar names help launch babies into speech-stream segmentation. Psychological Science 16(4):298–304.Google Scholar
Curtiss, S. (1977) Genie: A psycholinguistic study of a modern-day “wild child.” Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gilbreth, F. B. & Gilbreth, L. M. (1919) Applied motion study. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. S. & Newport, E. L. (1989) Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology. http://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(89)90003-0.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. K. (2004) Early language acquisition: Cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 5(11):831–43. http://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1533.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. H. (1964) A biological perspective of language. In: New directions in the study of language, ed. Lenneberg, E., pp. 65–88. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mandel, D. R., Jusczyk, P. W. & Pisoni, D. B. (1995) Infants' recognition of the sound patterns of their own names. Psychological Science 6(5):314–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maye, J., Werker, J. F. & Gerken, L. (2002) Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition 82:101–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newport, E. L. (1990) Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science 14:11–28.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2000) Toward a cognitive semantics. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tincoff, R. & Jusczyk, P. W. (1999) Some beginnings of word comprehension in 6-month-olds. Psychological Science 10(2):172–75. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tincoff, R. & Jusczyk, P. W. (2012) Six-month-olds comprehend words that refer to parts of the body. Infancy 17(4):432–44. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7078.2011.00084.x.Google Scholar
Vouloumanos, A. & Werker, J. F. (2007) Listening to language at birth: Evidence for a bias for speech in neonates. Developmental Science 10(2):159–64. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00549.x.Google Scholar
Weber-Fox, C. M. & Neville, H. J. (1996) Maturational constraints on functional specializations for language processing: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 8(3):231–56.Google Scholar
Werker, J. F., Yeung, H. H. & Yoshida, K. A. (2012) How do infants become experts at native-speech perception? Current Directions in Psychological Science 21(4):221–26. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412449459.Google Scholar
Yoshida, K. A., Pons, F., Maye, J. & Werker, J. F. (2010) Distributional phonetic learning at 10 months of age. Infancy 15(4):420–33. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7078.2009.00024.x.Google Scholar