Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:34:03.158Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Squeezing through the Now-or-Never bottleneck: Reconnecting language processing, acquisition, change, and structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2016

Nick Chater  and
Morten H. Christiansen
Nick Chater
Affiliation:
Behavioural Science Group, Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, United Kingdomnick.chater@wbs.ac.uk
Morten H. Christiansen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853christiansen@cornell.edu The Interacting Minds Centre, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT 06511.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

If human language must be squeezed through a narrow cognitive bottleneck, what are the implications for language processing, acquisition, change, and structure? In our target article, we suggested that the implications are far-reaching and form the basis of an integrated account of many apparently unconnected aspects of language and language processing, as well as suggesting revision of many existing theoretical accounts. With some exceptions, commentators were generally supportive both of the existence of the bottleneck and its potential implications. Many commentators suggested additional theoretical and linguistic nuances and extensions, links with prior work, and relevant computational and neuroscientific considerations; some argued for related but distinct viewpoints; a few, though, felt traditional perspectives were being abandoned too readily. Our response attempts to build on the many suggestions raised by the commentators and to engage constructively with challenges to our approach.

Type
Authors' Response
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 39 , 2016 , e91
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acheson, D. J. & MacDonald, M. C. (2011) The rhymes that the reader perused confused the meaning: Phonological effects on on-line sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 65:193–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, J. & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999) The emergence of grammaticality in connectionist networks. In: The emergence of language, ed. MacWhinney, B., pp. 115–51. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ambridge, B., Rowland, C. & Pine, J. (2008) Is structure dependence an innate constraint? New experimental evidence from children's complex question production. Cognitive Science 32:222–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, J. R. & Milson, R. (1989) Human memory: An adaptive perspective. Psychological Review 96:703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. R. & Schooler, L. J. (1991) Reflections of the environment in memory. Psychological Science 2:396–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnon, I. & Christiansen, M. H. (submitted) The role of multiword building blocks in explaining L1-L2 differencesGoogle Scholar
Arnon, I. & Cohen Priva, U. (2013) More than words: The effect of multi-word frequency and constituency on phonetic duration. Language and Speech 56:349–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bach, E., Brown, C. & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1986) Crossed and nested dependencies in German and Dutch: A psycholinguistic study. Language and Cognitive Processes 1:249–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. (1992) Working memory. Science 255:556–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A. D. & Hitch, G. J. (1974) Working memory. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation 8:47–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaubergs, M. S. & Braine, M. D. S. (1974) Short-term memory limitations on decoding self- embedded sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology 102:745–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, K. & Cutting, J. C. (1992) Regulating mental energy: Performance units in language production. Journal of Memory and Language 31:99–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bortfeld, H., Morgan, J. L., Golinkoff, R. M. & Rathbun, K. (2005) Mommy and me: Familiar names help launch babies into speech-stream segmentation. Psychological Science 16(4):298–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Botvinick, M. M. (2008) Hierarchical models of behavior and prefrontal function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12:201–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bransford, J. D. & Johnson, M. K. (1972) Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11:717–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bregman, A. S. (1990) Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodsky, P., Waterfall, H. & Edelman, S. (2007) Characterizing motherese: On the computational structure of child-directed language. In: Proceedings of the 29th Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, August 2007, pp. 833–38, ed. McNamara, D. S. & Trafton, J. G.. Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Brown, G. D. A., Neath, I. & Chater, N. (2007) A temporal ratio model of memory. Psychological Review 114:539–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burgess, N. & Hitch, G. J. (1999) Memory for serial order: A network model of the phonological loop and its timing. Psychological Review 106:551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. & Scheibman, J. (1999) The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: The reduction of don't in English. Linguistics 37:575–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chater, N. & Christiansen, M. H. (2010) Language acquisition meets language evolution. Cognitive Science 34:1131–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chater, N., McCauley, S. M. & Christiansen, M. H. (2016) Language as skill: Intertwining comprehension and production. Journal of Memory and Language 89:244–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chater, N., Reali, F. & Christiansen, M. H. (2009) Restrictions on biological adaptation in language evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106:1015–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chomsky, N. (1957) Syntactic structures. Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2010) Some simple evo-devo theses: How true might they be for language? In: Approaches to the evolution of language, ed. Larson, R. K., Deprez, V. M. & Yamakido, H.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Christiansen, M. H. & Chater, N. (2008) Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral & Brain Sciences 31(05):489–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christiansen, M. H. & Chater, N. (2015) The language faculty that wasn't: A usage-based account of natural language recursion. Frontiers in Psychology 6:1182. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christiansen, M. H. & Chater, N. (2016) Creating language: Integrating evolution, acquisition, and processing. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, M. H. & MacDonald, M. C. (2009) A usage-based approach to recursion in sentence processing. Language Learning 59(Suppl. 1):126–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christianson, K., Hollingworth, A., Halliwell, J. F. & Ferreira, F. (2001) Thematic-roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology 42:368–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, H. H. (1975) Bridging. In: Proceedings of the 1975 Workshop on Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing, Cambridge, MA, June 1975, ed. Nash-Webber, B. L. & Shank, R., pp. 169–74. Association for Computational Linguistics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connine, C. M., Blasko, D. G. & Hall, M. (1991) Effects of subsequent sentence context in auditory word recognition: Temporal and linguistic constraints. Journal of Memory and Language 30:234–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway, C. & Christiansen, M. H. (2005) Modality constrained statistical learning of tactile, visual, and auditory sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31:24–39.Google ScholarPubMed
Conway, C. M. & Christiansen, M. H. (2009) Seeing and hearing in space and time: Effects of modality and presentation rate on implicit statistical learning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 21:561–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cover, T. M. & Thomas, J. A. (2006) Elements of information theory, second edition. Wiley.Google Scholar
Cowan, N. (2000) The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24:87–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crain, S. & Nakayama, M. (1987) Structure dependence in grammar formation. Language 63:522–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowder, R. G. (1993) Systems and principles in memory theory: Another critique of pure memory. In: Theories of memory, ed. Collins, A., Gathercole, S., Conway, M. & Morris, P.. Erlbaum.Google ScholarPubMed
Darwin, C. (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex, vol. 1. John Murray.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1986) The blind watchmaker: Why the evidence of evolution reveals a universe without design. Norton.Google Scholar
de Vries, M. H., Geukes, S., Zwitserlood, P., Petersson, K. M. & Christiansen, M. H. (2012) Processing multiple non-adjacent dependencies: Evidence from sequence learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367:2065–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eldredge, N. & Gould, S. J. (1972) Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism. In: Models in paleobiology, ed. Schopf, T. J. M., pp. 82–115. Freeman Cooper.Google Scholar
Elman, J. L. (1990) Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science 14(2):179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endress, A. D. & Potter, M. C. (2014a) Large capacity temporary visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 143(1):548–65. doi: 10.1037/a0033934.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engelmann, F. & Vasishth, S. (2009) Processing grammatical and ungrammatical center embeddings in English and German: A computational model. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, Manchester, UK, July 2009, pp. 240–45. ed. Howes, A., Peebles, D. & Cooper, R..Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., Chase, W. G. & Faloon, S. (1980) Acquisition of a memory skill. Science 208:1181–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, N. & Levinson, S. (2009) The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32:429–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferreira, F. (1993) Creation of prosody during sentence production. Psychological Review 100:233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferreira, F. (2003) The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology 47(2):164–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferreira, F., Bailey, K. G. & Ferraro, V. (2002) Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science 11(1):11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, F. & Swets, B. (2002) How incremental is language production? Evidence from the production of utterances requiring the computation of arithmetic sums. Journal of Memory and Language 46(1):57–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitz, H. (2011) A liquid-state model of variability effects in learning nonadjacent dependencies. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Boston, MA, July 2011, ed. Carlson, L., Hölscher, C. & Shipley, T., pp. 897–902. Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Frank, S. L. & Bod, R. (2011) Insensitivity of the human sentence-processing system to hierarchical structure. Psychological Science 22:829–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frank, S. L., Trompenaars, T. & Vasishth, S. (2016) Cross-linguistic differences in processing double-embedded relative clauses: Working-memory constraints or language statistics? Cognitive Science. 40:554–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frazier, L. & Fodor, J. D. (1978) The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition 6:291–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, R. M. (1999) Catastrophic forgetting in connectionist networks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3:128–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frost, R., Armstrong, B. C., Siegelman, N. & Christiansen, M. H. (2015) Domain generality versus modality specificity: The paradox of statistical learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19:117–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gärdenfors, P. & Rott, H. (1995) Belief revision. In: Handbook of logic in artificial intelligence and logic programming, vol. 4, ed. Gabbay, D., pp. 35–132. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnham, A. & Oakhill, J. (1985) On-line resolution of anaphoric pronouns: Effects of inference making and verb semantics. British Journal of Psychology 76:385–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, M. F. (1980) Levels of processing in sentence production. In: Language production: Vol. 1. Speech and talk, ed. Butterworth, B.. pp. 177–221. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gertner, Y. & Fisher, C. (2012) Predicted errors in children's early sentence comprehension. Cognition 124:85–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, E. & Thomas, J. (1999) Memory limitations and structural forgetting: The perception of complex ungrammatical sentences as grammatical. Language and Cognitive Processes 14:225–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, E. & Wexler, K. (1994) Triggers. Linguistic Inquiry 25:407–54.Google Scholar
Gimenes, M., Rigalleau, F. & Gaonac'h, D. (2009) When a missing verb makes a French sentence more acceptable. Language and Cognitive Processes 24:440–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. (2006) Constructions at work. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gómez, R. L. (2002) Variability and detection of invariant structure. Psychological Science 13:431–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregory, R. L. (2005) The Medawar lecture 2001 knowledge for vision: Vision for knowledge. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 360:1231–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagstrom, P. & Rhee, R. (1997) The dependency locality theory in Korean. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 26:189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakes, D. T., Evans, J. S. & Brannon, L. L (1976) Understanding sentences with relative clauses. Memory and Cognition 4:283–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, H. W. & Deese, J. (1971) Comprehensibility and subject-verb relations in complex sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 10:163–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasson, U., Chen, J. & Honey, C. J. (2015) Hierarchical process memory: Memory as an integral component of information processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19(6):304–13. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.04.006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hintzman, D. L. (1988) Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review 95:528–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, V. M. (1988) Hesitations and sentence planning. Language and Cognitive Processes 3:323–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoover, M. L. (1992) Sentence processing strategies in Spanish and English. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 21:275–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. J. & Traugott, E. C. (1993) Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Horst, J. S. & Samuelson, L. K. (2008) Fast mapping but poor retention in 24-month-old infants. Infancy 13:128–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, G. (2012) Why chunking should be considered as an explanation for developmental change before short-term memory capacity and processing speed. Frontiers in Psychology 3:167. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Just, M. A. & Carpenter, P. A. (1992) A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review 99:122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kam, X. N. C., Stoyneshka, I., Tornyova, L., Fodor, J. D. & Sakas, W. G. (2008) Bigrams and the richness of the stimulus. Cognitive Science 32(4):771–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karlsson, F. (2007) Constraints on multiple center-embedding of clauses. Journal of Linguistics 43:365–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, B., Wigglesworth, G., Nordlinger, R. & Blythe, J. (2014) The acquisition of polysynthetic languages. Language and Linguistics Compass 8(2):51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, S., Cornish, H. & Smith, K. (2008) Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105:10681–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolers, P. A. & Roediger, H. L. (1984) Procedures of mind. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 23:425–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolodner, J. (1993) Case-based reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolodny, O., Edelman, S. & Lotem, A. (2014) The evolution of continuous learning of the structure of the environment. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 11:20131091.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolodny, O., Edelman, S. & Lotem, A. (2015a) Evolution of protolinguistic abilities as a by-product of learning to forage in structured environments. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 282(1811):20150353.Google ScholarPubMed
Kolodny, O., Lotem, A. & Edelman, S. (2015b) Learning a generative probabilistic grammar of experience: A process-level model of language acquisition. Cognitive Science 39:227–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, E. K., Brown-Schmidt, S. & Watson, D. G. (2013) Ways of looking ahead: Hierarchical planning in language production. Cognition 129:544–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Legge, G. E., Pelli, D. G., Rubin, G. S. & Schleske, M. M. (1985) Psychophysics of reading – I. Normal vision. Vision Research 25:239–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (2000) Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, D. (1991) How to set parameters: Arguments from language change. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Luck, S. J. & Vogel, E. K. (1997) The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature 390:279–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacDonald, M. C. & Christiansen, M. H. (2002) Reassessing working memory: A comment on Just & Carpenter (1992) and Waters & Caplan (1996). Psychological Review 109:35–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacKay, D. G. (1987) The organization of perception and action: A theory for language and other cognitive skills. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Major, G. & Tank, D. (2004) Persistent neural activity: Prevalence and mechanisms. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 14(6):675–84.Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. (1987) Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. Cognition 25:71–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCauley, S. M. & Christiansen, M. H. (2013) Toward a unified account of comprehension and production in language development. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36:366–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCauley, S. M. & Christiansen, M. H. (2014a) Acquiring formulaic language: A computational model. Mental Lexicon 9:419–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCauley, S. M. & Christiansen, M. H. (2015a) Computational investigations of multiword chunks in language learning. Submitted.Google Scholar
McCauley, S. M. & Christiansen, M. H. (2015b) Individual differences in chunking ability predict on-line sentence processing. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Pasadena, CA, July 2015, pp. 1553–58, ed. Noelle, D. C. & Dale, R.. Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
McCauley, S. M. & Christiansen, M. H. (2015c) Language learning as language use: A cross-linguistic model of child language development. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
McCauley, S. M., Monaghan, P. & Christiansen, M. H. (2015) Language emergence in development: A computational perspective. In: The handbook of language emergence, ed. MacWhinney, B. & O'Grady, W., pp. 415–36. Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, J. L. & Elman, J. L. (1986) The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology 18(1):1–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMurray, B., Horst, J. S. & Samuelson, L. K. (2012) Word learning emerges from the interaction of online referent selection and slow associative learning. Psychological Review 119:831–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. A. (1956) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 63(2):81–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monaghan, P. & Christiansen, M. H. (2010) Words in puddles of sound: Modelling psycholinguistic effects in speech segmentation. Journal of Child Language 37:545–64.Google Scholar
Murdock, B. B. (1983) A distributed memory model for serial-order information. Psychological Review 90:316–38.Google Scholar
O'Grady, W. (2013) The illusion of language acquisition. Approaches to Bilingualism 3:253–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Grady, W. (2015a) Anaphora and the case for emergentism. In: The handbook of language emergence, ed. MacWhinney, B. & O'Grady, W., pp. 100–22. Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pallier, C., Sebastian-Gallés, N., Dupoux, E., Christophe, A. & Mehler, J. (1998) Perceptual adjustment to time-compressed speech: A cross-linguistic study. Memory and Cognition 26(4):844–51.Google Scholar
Pashler, H. (1998) The psychology of attention. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pelucchi, B., Hay, J. F. & Saffran, J. R. (2009) Learning in reverse: Eight-month-old infants track backward transitional probabilities. Cognition 113:244–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterfalvi, J. M. & Locatelli, F (1971) L'acceptabilité des phrases [The acceptability of sentences]. L'Année Psychologique 71(2):417–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M. J. & Garrod, S. (2004) Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27:169–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M. J. & Garrod, S. (2007) Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11:105–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickering, M. J. & Garrod, S. (2013a) An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36: 329–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poggio, T. & Edelman, S. (1990) A network that learns to recognize 3D objects. Nature 343:263–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, M. C. (2012) Conceptual short term memory in perception and thought. Frontiers in Psychology 3:113. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pulman, S. G. (1985) A parser that doesn't. Proceedings of the Second European Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Geneva, Switzerland, March 1985, pp. 128–35, Association for Computational Linguistics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reali, F. & Christiansen, M. H. (2005) Uncovering the richness of the stimulus: Structure dependence and indirect statistical evidence. Cognitive Science 29(6):1007–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reali, F. & Christiansen, M. H. (2009) On the necessity of an interdisciplinary approach to language universals. In: Language universals, ed. Christiansen, M. H., Collins, C. & Edelman, S., pp. 266–77. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reali, F., Dale, R. & Christiansen, M. H. (2005) Colorless green ideas sleep furiously revisited: A statistical perspective. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Stresa, Italy, July 2005, pp. 1821–26, ed. Bara, B. G., Barsalou, L. W. & Bucciarelli, M.. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Reali, F. & Griffiths, T. (2009) The evolution of frequency distributions: Relating regularization to inductive biases through iterated learning. Cognition 111:317–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rumelhart, D. E., Smolensky, P., McClelland, J. L. & Hinton, G. (1986b) Sequential thought processes in PDP models. In: Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructures of cognition, vol. 2, ed, McClelland, J. L. & Rumelhart, D. E., pp. 3–57. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, W. (2012) Dedicated gestures and the emergence of sign language. Gesture 12:265–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanford, A. J. & Sturt, P. (2002) Depth of processing in language comprehension: Not noticing the evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6:382–86.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, I. M. (1975) Why a sentence in which a sentence in which a sentence is embedded is embedded is difficult. Linguistics 153:53–66.Google Scholar
Senghas, A., Kita, S. & Özyürek, A. (2004) Children creating core properties of language: Evidence from an emerging sign language in Nicaragua. Science 305:1779–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shanks, D. R. & St. John, M. F. (1994) Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17:367–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. & Chase, W. G. (1973) Skill in chess. American Scientist 61:393–403.Google Scholar
Singleton, J. L. & Newport, E. L. (2004) When learners surpass their models: The acquisition of American Sign Language from inconsistent input. Cognitive Psychology 49:370–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slattery, T. J., Sturt, P., Christianson, K., Yoshida, M. & Ferreira, F. (2013) Lingering misinterpretations of garden path sentences arise from flawed semantic processing. Journal of Memory and Language 69:104–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. & Wheeldon, L. (1999) High level processing scope in spoken sentence production. Cognition 73:205–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, M. & Wheeldon, L. (2004) Horizontal information flow in spoken sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 30:675–686.Google Scholar
Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., Hoymann, G., Rossano, F., de Ruiter, J. P., Yoon, K.-Y. & Levinson, S. C. (2009) Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106:10587–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swets, B., Desmet, T., Clifton, C. & Ferreira, F. (2008) Underspecification of syntactic ambiguities: Evidence from self-paced reading. Memory and Cognition 36:201–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M. (2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Trotzke, A., Bader, M. & Frazier, L. (2013) Third factors and the performance interface in language design. Biolinguistics 7:1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tylén, K., Christensen, P., Roepstorff, A., Lund, T., Østergaard, S. & Donald, M. (2015) Brains striving for coherence: Long-term cumulative plot formation in the default mode network. NeuroImage 121:106–14.Google Scholar
Uehara, K. & Bradley, D. (1996) The effect of -ga sequences on processing Japanese multiply center-embedded sentences. In: 11th Pacific-Asia conference on language, information, and computation, pp. 187–196. Seoul: Kyung Hee University.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, J. A. & Johns, C. L. (2012) Memory Interference as a determinant of language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass 6:193–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vasishth, S., Suckow, K., Lewis, R. L. & Kern, S. (2010) Short-term forgetting in sentence comprehension: Crosslinguistic evidence from verb-final structures. Language and Cognitive Processes 25:533–67.Google Scholar
Wagemans, J., Elder, J. H., Kubovy, M., Palmer, S. E., Peterson, M. A., Singh, M. & von der Heydt, R. (2012) A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure–ground organization. Psychological Bulletin 138:1172–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallace, R. S. (2005) Be your own botmaster, second edition, ALICE A.I. Foundation.Google Scholar
Wang, M. D. (1970) The role of syntactic complexity as a determiner of comprehensibility. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 9:398–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, W. S.-Y., ed. (1977) The lexicon in phonological change. Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, R. M., Obusek, C. J., Farmer, R. M. & Warren, R. P. (1969) Auditory sequence: Confusion of patterns other than speech or music. Science 164:586–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waters, A. J., Gobet, F. & Leyden, G. (2002) Visuospatial abilities of chess players. British Journal of Psychology 93(4):557–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werker, J. F., Yeung, H. H. & Yoshida, K. A. (2012) How do infants become experts at native-speech perception? Current Directions in Psychological Science 21(4):221–26. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412449459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xanthos, A., Lahaa, S., Gillis, S., Stefany, U., Aksu-Koc, A., Christofidou, A., Gagarina, N., Hrzica, G., Nihan Ketrez, F., Kilani-Schoch, M., Korecky-Kroll, K., Kovacevic, M., Laalo, K., Palmovic, M., Pfeiler, B., Voeikova, M. D. & Dressler, W. U. (2012) On the role of morphological richness in the early development of noun and verb inflection. First Language 31:461–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar