No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The key to cultural innovation lies in the group dynamic rather than in the individual mind
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 June 2012
Abstract
Vaesen infers unique properties of mind from the appearance of specific cultural innovation – a correlation without causal direction. Shifts in habitat, population density, and group dynamics are the only independently verifiable incentives for changes in cultural practices. The transition from Acheulean to Late Stone Age technologies requires that we consider how population and social dynamics affect cultural innovation and mental function.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012
References
Aiello, L. C. & Key, C. (2002) Energetic consequences of being a Homo erectus female. American Journal of Human Biology
14:551–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aiello, L. C. & Wells, J. C. (2002) Energetics and the evolution of the genus Homo
. Annual Review of Anthropology
31:323–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bavelier, D., Green, S. & Dye, M. W. (2010) Children, wired: For better and for worse. Neuron
9:692–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boserup, E. (1981) Population and technological change: A study of long-term trends. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cachel, S. & Harris, J. W. (1995) Ranging patterns, land-use and subsistence in Homo erectus from the perspective of evolutionary ecology. In: Human evolution in its ecological context. Palaeo-anthropology: Evolution and ecology of Homo erectus, ed. Bower, J. R. & Sartono, S., pp. 52–65. Leiden University.Google Scholar
Donald, M. W. (1991) Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fay, N., Garrod, S. & Carletta, J. (2000) Group discussion as interactive dialogue or as serial monologue: The influence of group size. Psychological Science
11(6):481–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fay, N., Garrod, S. & Roberts, L. (2008) The fitness and functionality of culturally evolved communication systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
363:351–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fay, N., Garrod, S., Roberts, L. & Swoboda, N. (2010) The interactive evolution of human communication systems. Cognitive Science
34(3):351–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garrod, S. & Doherty, G. (1994) Conversation, coordination and convention – An empirical investigation of how groups establish linguistic conventions. Cognition
53(3):181–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garrod, S., Fay, N., Rogers, S., Walker, B. & Swoboda, N. (2010) Can iterated learning explain the ermergence of graphical symbols?
Interaction Studies
11(1):33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003) The resilience of langauge: What gesture creation in deaf children can tell us about how all children learn language. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Greenfield, P. M. (1984) Mind and media: The effects of television, videogames, and computers. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hrdy, S. B. (2009) Mothers and others: The evoltuionary origins of mutual understanding. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jochim, M. A. (1976) Hunter-Gatherer subsistence and settlement: A predictive model. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jochim, M. A. (1981) Strategies for survival: Cultural behavior in an ecological context. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, H., Hill, K., Lancaster, J. & Hurtado, A. M. (2000) A theory of human life history evolution: Diet, intelligence, and longevity. Evolutionary Anthropology
4:156–85.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kegl, J., Senghas, A. & Coppola, M. (1999) Creation through contact: Sign language emergence and sign language change in Nicaragua. In: Language creation and language change: Creolization, diachrony, and development, pp. 179–238. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (1984) Knowledge of sign language in an Australian Aboriginal community. Journal of Anthropological Research
40:556–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laden, G. & Wrangham, R. W. (2005) The rise of the hominids as an adaptive shift in fallback foods: Plant underground storage organs (USOs) and the origin of australopiths. Journal of Human Evolution
49:482–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connell, J., Hawkes, K. & Blurton Jones, N. (2002) Meat-eating, grandmothering, and the evolution of early human diets. In: Human diet: Its origin and evolution, ed. Ungar, P. S. & Teaford, M. F., pp. 49–60. Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
Ragir, S. (1985) Retarded development: The evolutionary mechanism underlying the emergence of the human capacity for language. The Journal of Mind and Behavior
6(4):451–68.Google Scholar
Ragir, S. (2000) Diet and food preparation: Rethinking early hominid behavior. Evolutionary Anthropology
9(4):153–56.3.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragir, S. (2002) Constraints on communities with indigenous sign languages: Clues to the dynamics of language genesis. In: Transitions to language, ed Wray, A., pp. 272–94. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragir, S., Rosenberg, M. & Tierno, P. (2000) Gut morphology and the avoidance of carrion among chimpanzees, baboons and early hominids. Journal of Anthropological Research
56(4):477–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senghas, R. J., Senghas, A. & Pyers, J. E. (2005) The emergence of Nicaraguan sign language: Questions of development, acquisition, and evolution. In Biology and knowledge revisited: From neurogenesis to psychogenesis, ed. Langer, J., Parker, S. T. & Milbrath, C., pp. 287–306. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Steels, L. (2006) Experiments on the emergence of human communication. Trends in Cognitive Sciences
10(8):347–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steels, L., Kaplan, F., Mcintyre, A. & Van Looveren, J. (2002) Crucial factors in the origins of word-meaning. In: The transitions to language, ed. Wray, A., pp. 252–71. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobach, E., Falmagne, R. J., Parlee, M. B., Martin, L. M. W. & Scribner Kapelman, A. (1997) Mind and social practice: Selected writings of Sylvia Scribner. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Target article
The cognitive bases of human tool use
Related commentaries (30)
An area specifically devoted to tool use in human left inferior parietal lobule
Brain structures playing a crucial role in the representation of tools in humans and non-human primates
Can object affordances impact on human social learning of tool use?
Cathedrals, symphony orchestras, and iPhones: The cultural basis of modern technology
Childhood and advances in human tool use
Cultural intelligence is key to explaining human tool use
Evidence from convergent evolution and causal reasoning suggests that conclusions on human uniqueness may be premature
Evidence of recursion in tool use
Foresight, function representation, and social intelligence in the great apes
Human tool behavior is species-specific and remains unique
Human tool-making capacities reflect increased information-processing capacities: Continuity resides in the eyes of the beholder
Language and tool making are similar cognitive processes
Look, no hands!
Motor planning in primates
Neurocognitive anthropology: What are the options?
Not by thoughts alone: How language supersizes the cognitive toolkit
Prosthetic gestures: How the tool shapes the mind
So, are we the massively lucky species?
Technological selection: A missing link
The dual nature of tools and their makeover
The key to cultural innovation lies in the group dynamic rather than in the individual mind
The limits of chimpanzee-human comparisons for understanding human cognition
The role of executive control in tool use
Thinking tools: Acquired skills, cultural niche construction, and thinking with things
Tool innovation may be a critical limiting step for the establishment of a rich tool-using culture: A perspective from child development
Tool use and constructions
Tool use as situated cognition
Tool use induces complex and flexible plasticity of human body representations
Unique features of human movement control predicted by the leading joint hypothesis
What exists in the environment that motivates the emergence, transmission, and sophistication of tool use?
Author response
From individual cognition to populational culture