Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T23:08:38.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language is not a gadget

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2019

Peter Ford Dominey Open the ORCID record for Peter Ford Dominey [Opens in a new window]
Peter Ford Dominey*
Affiliation:
INSERM U1093 Cognition, Action and Sensorimotor Plasticity, Université de Bourgogne, UFR Staps, BP 27877, 21078 Dijon, France. peter.dominey@inserm.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Heyes does well to argue that some of the apparently innate human capabilities for cultural learning can be considered in terms of more general-purpose mechanisms. In the application of this to language, she overlooks some of its most interesting properties. I review three, and then illustrate how mindreading can come from general-purpose mechanism via language.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 42 , 2019 , e175
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bates, E. & MacWhinney, B. (1987) Competition, variation, and language learning. In: Mechanisms of language acquisition, ed. MacWhinney, B. & Bates, E., pp. 157–93. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Wulfeck, B. & MacWhinney, B. (1991) Cross-linguistic research in aphasia: An overview. Brain and Language 41:123–48.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1991) The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry 18(1):1–21.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1990) Acts of meaning. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (2009) Actual minds, possible worlds. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dominey, P. F. (1995) Complex sensory-motor sequence learning based on recurrent state representation and reinforcement learning. Biological Cybernetics 73(3):265–74.Google Scholar
Dominey, P. F. (2013) Recurrent temporal networks and language acquisition – from corticostriatal neurophysiology to reservoir computing. Frontiers in Psychology 4:1–14.Google Scholar
Dominey, P. F., Hoen, M., Blanc, J. M. & Lelekov-Boissard, T. (2003) Neurological basis of language and sequential cognition: Evidence from simulation, aphasia, and ERP studies. Brain and Language 86(2):207–25.Google Scholar
Dominey, P. F., Inui, T. & Hoen, M. (2009) Neural network processing of natural language: II. Towards a unified model of corticostriatal function in learning sentence comprehension and non-linguistic sequencing. Brain and Language 109(2–3):80–92.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. & Hutto, D. (2008) Understanding others through primary interaction and narrative practice. In: The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity, ed. Zlatev, J., Racine, T. P., Sinha, C., & Itkonen, E., pp. 17–38. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. (1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goucha, T., Zaccarella, E. & Friederici, A. D. (2017) A revival of the Homo loquens as a builder of labeled structures: Neurocognitive considerations. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 81(Part B):213–24.Google Scholar
Heyes, C. (2018) Cognitive gadgets: The cultural evolution of thinking. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hinaut, X. & Dominey, P. F. (2013) Real-time parallel processing of grammatical structure in the fronto-striatal system: A recurrent network simulation study using reservoir computing. PloS One 8(2):e52946.Google Scholar
Hutto, D. D. (2007) The narrative practice hypothesis: Origins and applications of folk psychology. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 60:43–68. doi: 10.1017/S1358246107000033.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (2008) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Li, P. & Macwhinney, B. (2013) Competition model. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Mealier, A.-L., Pointeau, G., Mirliaz, S., Ogawa, K., Finlayson, M. & Dominey, P. F. (2017) Narrative constructions for the organization of self experience: Proof of concept via embodied robotics. Frontiers in Psychology: Language Sciences 8:1331. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01331.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. & Fivush, R. (2004) The emergence of autobiographical memory: A social cultural developmental theory. Psychological Review 111(2):486–511.Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1988) Narrative knowing and the human sciences. State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1984) Time and narrative, vol. 1. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. & Kearney, R. (1978) Myth as the bearer of possible worlds. The Crane Bag 2(1/2):112–18.Google Scholar
Stout, D. & Chaminade, T. (2012) Stone tools, language and the brain in human evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367(1585):75–87.Google Scholar