Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T21:39:19.030Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What is art and how does it differ from aesthetics?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2017

Robert Kreuzbauer*
Affiliation:
Surrey Business School, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Rik Medlik Building, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, United Kingdom. r.kreuzbauer@surrey.ac.ukhttp://www.surrey.ac.uk/sbs/people/robert_kreuzbauer/

Abstract

Art objects differ from other objects because they are intentionally created to embody a producer's (i.e., artist's) expression. Hence, art objects are social objects whose appeal and value are determined largely by the strategic interaction between the artist and the audience. I discuss several aspects of how strategic interaction can affect an art object's perceived value and aesthetic appeal.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Klimek, P., Kreuzbauer, R. & Thurner, S. (2017) Countersignaling drives competition between cultural elites: Quantitative evidence from fashion/style cycles in music. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
Kreuzbauer, R. & Cheon, B. (2015) Strategies of counterdominance: When luxury doesn't give you power. Paper presented at the Second International Conference of the Society of Consumer Psychology, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Kreuzbauer, R. & Keller, J. (2017) The authenticity of cultural products: A psychological perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science. Available at: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/814077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreuzbauer, R., King, D. & Basu, S. (2015) The mind in the object – Psychological valuation of materialized human expression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 144(4):764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed