Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:47:30.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Art as emotional exploration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2017

Keith Oatley
Keith Oatley*
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Psychology and Human Development, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1V6, Canada. keith.oatley@utoronto.cahttp://sites.google.com/site/keithoatleyhomepage/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Roman poet Horace said poetry gives pleasure and instructs. A more informative theory is that poetry and art, in general, are less about pleasure than about exploration of emotions. Literary authors concentrate on negative emotions, seemingly to try and understand them. In two studies, reading literary art enabled the transformation of selfhood, not by being instructed but by people changing in their own ways.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 40 , 2017 , e372
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chekhov, A. (1899) The lady with the toy dog. In: Anton Chekhov: Five great short stories, trans. Koteliansky, S. S. & Cannan, G.. pp. 81–94. Dover (current edition 1990).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. (1938) The principles of art. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Djikic, M. & Oatley, K. (2014) The art in fiction: From indirect communication to changes of the self. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 8:498–505.Google Scholar
Djikic, M., Oatley, K. & Carland, M. (2012) Genre or artistic merit: The effect of literature on personality. Scientific Study of Literature 2:25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djikic, M., Oatley, K. & Peterson, J. B. (2006) The bitter-sweet labor of emoting: The linguistic comparison of writers and physicists. Creativity Research Journal 18(2):191–97. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1802_5.Google Scholar
Djikic, M., Oatley, K., Zoeterman, S. & Peterson, J. B. (2009) On being moved by art: How reading fiction transforms the self. Creativity Research Journal 21(1):24–29. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1080/10400410802633392.Google Scholar
Horace (19 BCE/1932) Ars poetica [The art of poetry]. In: Horace: Satires, epistles and ars poetica, ed. & trans. Fairclough, H. R.. Heineman (current edition 1932).Google Scholar
Oatley, K. (2016) Fiction: Simulation of social worlds. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 20:618–28.Google Scholar
Pennebaker, J. W., Francis, M. E. & Booth, R. J. (2001) Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC 2001. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Vanhaerren, M., d'Errico, F., Stronger, C., James, S. L., Todd, J. A. & Mienis, H. K. (2006) Middle palaeolithic shell beads in Israel and Algeria. Science 312:1785.Google Scholar