This paper introduces a counting process for event arrivals in high-frequency trading, based on high-dimensional covariates. The novelty is that, under sparsity conditions on the true model, we do not need to impose any model penalty or parameters shrinkage, unlike Lasso. The procedure allows us to derive a central limit theorem to test restrictions in a two-stage estimator. We achieve this by the use of a sign constraint on the intensity which necessarily needs to be positive. In particular, we introduce an additive model to extract the nonlinear impact of order book variables on buy and sell trade arrivals. In the empirical application, we show that the shape and dynamics of the order book are fundamental in determining the arrival of buy and sell trades in the crude oil futures market. We establish our empirical results mapping the covariates into a higher-dimensional space. Consistently with the theoretical results, the estimated models are sparse in the number of parameters. Using this approach, we are also able to compare competing model hypotheses on the basis of an out-of-sample likelihood ratio type of test.

Unobserved heterogeneous treatment effects have been emphasized in the recent policy evaluation literature (see, e.g., Heckman and Vytlacil (2005, Econometrica 73, 669–738)). This paper proposes a nonparametric test for unobserved heterogeneous treatment effects in a treatment effect model with a binary treatment assignment, allowing for individuals’ self-selection to the treatment. Under the standard local average treatment effects assumptions, i.e., the no defiers condition, we derive testable model restrictions for the hypothesis of unobserved heterogeneous treatment effects. Furthermore, we show that if the treatment outcomes satisfy a monotonicity assumption, these model restrictions are also sufficient. Then, we propose a modified Kolmogorov–Smirnov-type test which is consistent and simple to implement. Monte Carlo simulations show that our test performs well in finite samples. For illustration, we apply our test to study heterogeneous treatment effects of the Job Training Partnership Act on earnings and the impacts of fertility on family income, where the null hypothesis of homogeneous treatment effects gets rejected in the second case but fails to be rejected in the first application.

We estimate the density and its derivatives using a local polynomial approximation to the logarithm of an unknown density function f. The estimator is guaranteed to be non-negative and achieves the same optimal rate of convergence in the interior as on the boundary of the support of f. The estimator is therefore well-suited to applications in which non-negative density estimates are required, such as in semiparametric maximum likelihood estimation. In addition, we show that our estimator compares favorably with other kernel-based methods, both in terms of asymptotic performance and computational ease. Simulation results confirm that our method can perform similarly or better in finite samples compared to these alternative methods when they are used with optimal inputs, that is, an Epanechnikov kernel and optimally chosen bandwidth sequence. We provide code in several languages.

Spatial units typically vary over many of their characteristics, introducing potential unobserved heterogeneity which invalidates commonly used homoskedasticity conditions. In the presence of unobserved heteroskedasticity, methods based on the quasi-likelihood function generally produce inconsistent estimates of both the spatial parameter and the coefficients of the exogenous regressors. A robust generalized method of moments estimator as well as a modified likelihood method have been proposed in the literature to address this issue. The present paper constructs an alternative indirect inference (II) approach which relies on a simple ordinary least squares procedure as its starting point. Heteroskedasticity is accommodated by utilizing a new version of continuous updating that is applied within the II procedure to take account of the parameterization of the variance–covariance matrix of the disturbances. Finite-sample performance of the new estimator is assessed in a Monte Carlo study. The approach is implemented in an empirical application to house price data in the Boston area, where it is found that spatial effects in house price determination are much more significant under robustification to heterogeneity in the equation errors.

For the last two decades, high-dimensional data and methods have proliferated throughout the literature. Yet, the classical technique of linear regression has not lost its usefulness in applications. In fact, many high-dimensional estimation techniques can be seen as variable selection that leads to a smaller set of variables (a “submodel”) where classical linear regression applies. We analyze linear regression estimators resulting from model selection by proving estimation error and linear representation bounds uniformly over sets of submodels. Based on deterministic inequalities, our results provide “good” rates when applied to both independent and dependent data. These results are useful in meaningfully interpreting the linear regression estimator obtained after exploring and reducing the variables and also in justifying post-model-selection inference. All results are derived under no model assumptions and are nonasymptotic in nature.

We consider high-frequency observations from a one-dimensional time-homogeneous diffusion process Y. We assume that the diffusion coefficient $\sigma $ is continuously differentiable in y, but with a jump discontinuity at some level y, say $y=0$. We first study sign-constrained kernel estimators of functions of the left and right limits of $\sigma $ at $0$. These functions intricately depend on both limits. We propose a method to extricate these functions by searching for bandwidths where the kernel estimators are stable by iteration. We finally provide an estimator of the discontinuity jump size. We prove its convergence in probability and discuss its rate of convergence. A Monte Carlo study shows the finite sample properties of this estimator.

We propose a novel conditional quantile prediction method based on complete subset averaging (CSA) for quantile regressions. All models under consideration are potentially misspecified, and the dimension of regressors goes to infinity as the sample size increases. Since we average over the complete subsets, the number of models is much larger than the usual model averaging method which adopts sophisticated weighting schemes. We propose to use an equal weight but select the proper size of the complete subset based on the leave-one-out cross-validation method. Building upon the theory of Lu and Su (2015, Journal of Econometrics 188, 40–58), we investigate the large sample properties of CSA and show the asymptotic optimality in the sense of Li (1987, Annals of Statistics 15, 958–975) We check the finite sample performance via Monte Carlo simulations and empirical applications.

Three-dimensional panel models are widely used in empirical analysis. Researchers use various combinations of fixed effects for three-dimensional panels while the correct specification is unknown. When one imposes a parsimonious model and the true model is rich in complexity, the fitted model inevitably incurs the consequences of misspecification including potential bias. When a richly specified model is employed and the true model is parsimonious, then the consequences typically include a poor fit with larger standard errors than necessary. It is therefore useful for researchers to have good model selection techniques that assist in determining the “true” model or a satisfactory approximation. In this light, Lu, Miao, and Su (2021, Econometric Reviews 40, 867–898) propose methods of model selection. We advance this literature by proposing a method of post-selection inference for regression parameters. Despite our use of the lasso technique as the means of model selection, our assumptions allow for many and even all fixed effects to be nonzero. This property is important to avoid a degenerate distribution of fixed effects which often reflect economic sizes of countries in gravity analyses of trade. Using an international trade database, we document evidence that our key assumption of approximately sparse fixed effects is plausibly satisfied for gravity analyses of trade. We also establish the uniform size control over alternative data generating processes of fixed effects. Simulation studies demonstrate that the proposed method is less biased than under-fitting fixed effect estimators, is more efficient than over-fitting fixed effect estimators, and robustly allows for inference that is as accurate as the oracle estimator.

This paper considers a generalized panel data transformation model with fixed effects where the structural function is assumed to be additive. In our model, no parametric assumptions are imposed on the transformation function, the structural function, or the distribution of the idiosyncratic error term. The model is widely applicable and includes many popular panel data models as special cases. We propose a kernel-based nonparametric estimator for the structural function. The estimator has a closed-form solution and is easy to implement. We study the asymptotic properties of our estimator and show that it is asymptotically normally distributed. The Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate that our new estimator performs well in finite samples.

Conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) and conditional expected shortfall (CES) are widely adopted risk measures which help monitor potential tail risk while adapting to evolving market information. In this paper, we propose an approach to constructing simultaneous confidence bands (SCBs) for tail risk as measured by CVaR and CES, with the confidence bands uniformly valid for a set of tail levels. We consider one-sided tail risk (downside or upside tail risk) as well as relative tail risk (the ratio of upside to downside tail risk). A general class of location-scale models with heavy-tailed innovations is employed to filter out the return dynamics. Then, CVaR and CES are estimated with the aid of extreme value theory. In the asymptotic theory, we consider two scenarios: (i) the extreme scenario that allows for extrapolation beyond the range of the available data and (ii) the intermediate scenario that works exclusively in the case where the available data are adequate relative to the tail level. For finite-sample implementation, we propose a novel bootstrap procedure to circumvent the slow convergence rates of the SCBs as well as infeasibility of approximating the limiting distributions. A series of Monte Carlo simulations confirm that our approach works well in finite samples.

We study linear subset regression in the context of the high-dimensional overall model $y = \vartheta +\theta ' z + \epsilon $ with univariate response y and a d-vector of random regressors z, independent of $\epsilon $. Here, “high-dimensional” means that the number d of available explanatory variables is much larger than the number n of observations. We consider simple linear submodels where y is regressed on a set of p regressors given by $x = M'z$, for some $d \times p$ matrix M of full rank $p < n$. The corresponding simple model, that is, $y=\alpha +\beta ' x + e$, is usually justified by imposing appropriate restrictions on the unknown parameter $\theta $ in the overall model; otherwise, this simple model can be grossly misspecified in the sense that relevant variables may have been omitted. In this paper, we establish asymptotic validity of the standard F-test on the surrogate parameter $\beta $, in an appropriate sense, even when the simple model is misspecified, that is, without any restrictions on $\theta $ whatsoever and without assuming Gaussian data.

This paper derives asymptotic risk (expected loss) results for shrinkage estimators with multidimensional regularization in high-dimensional settings. We introduce a class of multidimensional shrinkage estimators (MuSEs), which includes the elastic net, and show that—as the number of parameters to estimate grows—the empirical loss converges to the oracle-optimal risk. This result holds when the regularization parameters are estimated empirically via cross-validation or Stein’s unbiased risk estimate. To help guide applied researchers in their choice of estimator, we compare the empirical Bayes risk of the lasso, ridge, and elastic net in a spike and normal setting. Of the three estimators, we find that the elastic net performs best when the data are moderately sparse and the lasso performs best when the data are highly sparse. Our analysis suggests that applied researchers who are unsure about the level of sparsity in their data might benefit from using MuSEs such as the elastic net. We exploit these insights to propose a new estimator, the cubic net, and demonstrate through simulations that it outperforms the three other estimators for any sparsity level.

The left-tailed unit-root tests of the panel analysis of nonstationarity in idiosyncratic and common components (PANIC) proposed by Bai and Ng (2004, Econometrica 72, 1127–1177) have standard local asymptotic power. We assess the size and power properties of the right-tailed version of the PANIC tests when the common and/or the idiosyncratic components are moderately explosive. We find that, when an idiosyncratic component is moderately explosive, the tests for the common components may have considerable size distortions, and those for an idiosyncratic component may suffer from the nonmonotonic power problem. We provide an analytic explanation under the moderately local to unity framework developed by Phillips and Magdalinos (2007, Journal of Econometrics 136, 115–130). We then propose a new cross-sectional (CS) approach to disentangle the common and idiosyncratic components in a relatively short explosive window. Our Monte Carlo simulations show that the CS approach is robust to the nonmonotonic power problem.

In this paper, we reconsider the assumptions that ensure the identification of the production function in Olley and Pakes (1996, Econometrica 64, 1263–1297). We show that an index restriction plays a crucial role in the identification, especially if the capital stock is measured by the perpetual inventory method. The index restriction is not sufficient for identification under sample selectivity. The index restriction makes it possible to derive the influence function and the asymptotic variance of the Olley–Pakes estimator.

The paper establishes the local asymptotic normality property for general conditionally heteroskedastic time series models of multiplicative form, $\epsilon _t=\sigma _t(\boldsymbol {\theta }_0)\eta _t$, where the volatility $\sigma _t(\boldsymbol {\theta }_0)$ is a parametric function of $\{\epsilon _{s}, s< t\}$, and $(\eta _t)$ is a sequence of i.i.d. random variables with common density $f_{\boldsymbol {\theta }_0}$. In contrast with earlier results, the finite dimensional parameter $\boldsymbol {\theta }_0$ enters in both the volatility and the density specifications. To deal with nondifferentiable functions, we introduce a conditional notion of the familiar quadratic mean differentiability condition which takes into account parameter variation in both the volatility and the errors density. Our results are illustrated on two particular models: the APARCH with asymmetric Student-t distribution, and the Beta-t-GARCH model, and are extended to handle a conditional mean.

A popular validation procedure for Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) models consists in comparing the structural shocks and impulse-response functions obtained by estimation-calibration of the DSGE with those obtained in an Structural Vector Autoregressions (SVAR) identified by means of some of the DSGE restrictions. I show that this practice can be seriously misleading when the variables used in the SVAR contain measurement errors. If this is the case, for generic values of the parameters of the DSGE, the shocks estimated in the SVAR are not “made of” the corresponding structural shocks plus measurement error. Rather, each of the SVAR shocks is contaminated by noncorresponding structural shocks. We argue that High-Dimensional Dynamic Factor Models are free from this drawback and are the natural model to use in validation procedures for DSGEs.