IntroductionEmpathy is an essential skill in the doctor-patient relationship since it contributes to improve aspects of health care and patient satisfaction. Nevertheless, burnout research projects have been developed in recent years.
MethodsA non-experimental, cross-sectional design was proposed. The type of study was correlational-descriptive since it was sought out to explore a functional relation through the prognosis of a criterion variable. Sample: 200 (100 female and 100 male).
ResultsFirst, the variance of cognitive and Affective Empathy was dug out in the emotional exhaustation criterion scale. Results accounted for 15% of variability in emotional exhaustation. (Corrected R 2 = .15, F = 17,56, p = 0,00). The best predictor of emotional exhaustation refers to Cognitive Empathy. (B = -.27, p = 0.00). It does not seem that Affective Empathy acts as a predictor variable of Emotional Exhaustation. (Table 1).Table 1Multiple linear regression analysis considering Emotional Exhaustation as a criterion.
TECA | Corrected R2 | F | B | p |
---|
Cognitive Empathy | .15 | 17,5 | -.27** | 0,00 |
Affective Empathy | | | -.14 | .13 |
The predictive capacity of Empathy in relation to Depersonalization was estimated (Corrected R 2 = .20, F = 25,4, p = 0.00). Cognitive and affective empathy were included as predictor variables and MBI as a criterion variable (Table 2). On one hand, the best predictor of Depersonalization is the Cognitive Empathy. On the other hand, regarding Affective Empathy, it does not act as a predictor of Depersonalization.Table 2Multiple linear regression analysis considering Depersonalization as a criterion.
TECA | Corrected R2 | F | B | p |
---|
Cognitive Empathy | .20 | 25,4 | -.32** | 0,00 |
Affective Empathy | | | -.15 | .84 |
Lastly, the predictive capacity of Empathy in relation to Personal Achievement was figured out. (Corrected R 2 = .19, F = 23,4, p = 0.00). Cognitive Empathy is the best predictor for Personal Fulfillment (Table 3).Table 3Multiple linear regression analysis considering Personal Fullfilment as a criterion.
TECA | Corrected R2 | F | β | p |
---|
Cognitive Empathy | .20 | 25,4 | .43** | 0,00 |
Affective Empathy | | | .00 | .96 |
ConclusionsIt was noticed that through a linear multiple regression analysis, the variable that best explains Emotional Exhaustation is Cognitive Empathy. Those results are replicated for Depersonalization and Personal Fullfilment.