To evaluate the efficacy of an educational program for the prevention of catheter colonization.

Two cross-sectional studies were carried out in a 500-bed randomly selected area of the hospital, separated by an educational program on the care of intravenous lines based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for the control of catheter-related infections.

A 2,100-bed urban general hospital affiliated with the University of Madrid (Spain).

Characteristics of patients and catheters and appropriateness of catheter care were evaluated. Cultures were taken from the point of insertion of the vascular catheter, the hubs, and infusion fluids. When catheter-associated infection was suspected, the distal end of the catheter was sent for culture and two blood cultures were taken. We compared the clinical and microbiological data before and after carrying out an educational program based on CDC recommendations for the control of catheter-related infections.

Characteristics of patients and catheters did not differ between the two cross-sectional studies. Compared with baseline data, after the educational program we observed a reduction of inappropriate catheter care, from 83% to 38% (45% difference, 95% confidence interval [CI95], 55% to 35%, P<0.0000), and a reduction in the rate of skin colonization, from 34% to 18% (16% difference, CI95, 26% to 5%, P<0.001). The frequency of phlebitis (15% versus 14%), hub colonizations (12% versus 11%), catheter colonizations (2% versus 1%), and catheter-related bacteremias (0% versus 0%) remained unchanged between the two cross-sectional studies.

Our educational program improved catheter care and reduced significantly the proportion of skin colonization around the insertion point. However, the educational program did not modify the proportion of hub colonization; because hub colonization has been demonstrated to be a source of line sepsis, our data suggest the need for a specific program directed to the maintenance of catheter hubs.

To evaluate tuberculin skin test (TST) conversions among a group of medical students.

Questionnaire sent to a medical school class in whom a cluster of TST conversions was noted, and interview and repeat TST of students with conversion.

County hospital and associated medical school.

Medical students, after their third year in medical school.

Of 165 students in the class, 115 (70%) responded; 10 reported TST conversions between the beginning of the third and the fourth year. Seven of 10 were interviewed, and all 10 were retested. Five students, all in a cohort who tested each other during a clinical clerkship with a tuberculin material previously reported to be associated with a high rate of false-positive TSTs, were TST negative on repeat. Five had persistently positive TSTs. One was exposed during a psychiatry clerkship to a resident with pulmonary tuberculosis. Four students appeared to have converted their TST during their third year in medical school. All four did their medicine clerkship at a large county hospital (P<0.02; odds ratio = 16.4) that had few infection control measures in place for tuberculosis isolation during the time of their exposure.

We recommend that medical students, as well as other healthcare professions students, be educated about infection control practices and skin tested at least annually during clinical training years.

To determine the incidence and type of antibiotic use variances at our institution.

Inpatient bacterial culture and susceptibility results were reviewed for 1 week per month. Medication administration records were evaluated to determine whether antibiotic selection was appropriate, given the susceptibility of the organism. Process indicators included use of the least costly antibiotic. as well as appropriate dose, interval, and route of administration. The complete medical record was reviewed for all patients if management did not appear to meet criteria.

A 225-bed. tertiary-care children’s teaching hospital.

Thirty-five (8.2%) of 428 patients reviewed over 12 months had a total of 49 variances: failure to treat (3), treatment of contaminant/colonizer (2), use of more costly agent (10), failure to revise therapy (8), inappropriate route (2), inappropriate empiric antibiotic (4), incorrect dose (3), unnecessary multiple antibiotics (6), inappropriate drug (8), and prolonged prophylaxis (3).

Thirty-five patients with 10 types of variances were identified during the study. Follow-up monitoring will assess the impact of educational efforts on the incidence of variances. Specific problem antibiotics have been identified for further audits.

Develop national estimates of compliance with infection control guidelines by workers in healthcare facilities to prevent occupational transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and human immunodeficiency virus.

A national survey of 3,094 workers in hospitals.

United States ambulatory care hospitals with emergency rooms.

While the sampled hospitals had policies that incorporated the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) infection control guidelines, only 55% of patient care staff, 56% of physicians, and 30% of housekeeping staffreported receiving at least one of the shots recommended in the HBV vaccination series. About one half of patient care staff reported that they recapped used needles at least sometimes after giving injections and after drawing blood. Only 43% of patient care staff “always” wore gloves to draw blood. While most patient care staff “always” changed gloves between patients, only 61% reported that they “always” washed their hands after taking off their gloves. One half of patient care staff reported a percutaneous exposure to a patient's blood, and one quarter reported a percutaneous exposure in the past year The most common cause of these exposures was recapping used needles.

Efforts to reduce exposures to bloodborne pathogens will involve compliance with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration bloodborne pathogens standard and the CDC's infection control guidelines, continued education and training, and emphasis on engineering controls where applicable.

To characterize the epidemiology of percutaneous injuries of healthcare workers (HCWs) in Ile-Ife, Nigeria.

A cross-sectional survey of a randorn sample of HCWs regarding details of needle-stick and sharp instrument injuries within the previous year

University hospital and clinics in Ile-Ife, Nigeria.

Hospital personnel with potential occupational exposure to patients' blood.

Needlestick accidents during the previous year were reported by 27% of 474 HCWs, including 100% of dentists, 81% of surgeons, 32% of nonsurgical physicians, and 31% of nursing staff. The rate of needlestick injuries was 0.6 per person-year overall: 2.3 for dentists, 2.3 for surgeons, 0.4 for nonsurgical physicians, and 0.6 for nursing staff. Circumstances associated with needlestick injuries included unexpected patient movement in 29%, handling or disposal of used needles in 23%, needle recapping in 18%, accidental stick by a colleague in and needle disassembly in 10%. Sharp instrument injuries were reported by 15% of and most commonly involved broken glass patient specimen containers (39%). Almost all were aware of the potential risk of HIV transmission through percutaneous injuries, and 91% considered themselves very concerned about their occupational risk of HIV acquisition.

The high frequency of percutaneous exposure to blood among HCWs in this Nigerian hospital potentially could be reduced by simple interventions at modest cost.