We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save this undefined to your undefined account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your undefined account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
A bicentric polygon is one which possesses both an incircle and a circumcircle. To every bicentric polygon belong sets of circles which relate to them in the way described below (Figure 1). We take the triangle as our exemplar. We state results which students can verify using elementary methods. They may consult [1] for our own proofs but in several cases they may spot a neater approach. If so they should submit it to this journal as Feedback.
Having done the formula
$${\textstyle{1 \over 3}}(\boldsymbol {a} + \boldsymbol {b} + \boldsymbol {c})$$
for the centre of mass of a uniform triangular lamina with vertices at position vectors a, b, c, I was recently asked in class whether
$${\textstyle{1 \over 4}}(\boldsymbol {a} + \boldsymbol {b} + \boldsymbol {c} + \boldsymbol {d})$$
was the corresponding result for a uniform quadrilateral lamina. It is easy to give examples where the formula does work (squares, rectangles, parallelograms), but equally clear from examples such as the trapezium in Figure 1, where the centre of mass is located below the centre line on which
$${\textstyle{1 \over 4}}(\boldsymbol {a} + \boldsymbol {b} + \boldsymbol {c} + \boldsymbol {d})$$
lies, that it does not always work.