Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:08:41.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Correlations between indirect and direct measurements of body composition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2007

A. J Kempster
A. J Kempster
Affiliation:
Meat and Livestock Commission, PO Box 44, Queensway House, Bletchley, Milton Keynes MK2 2EF
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium on ‘Comparative Aspects of Body Composition of Farm and Laboratory Animals’
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , February 1986 , pp. 55 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1986

References

Commission of the European Communities (1979). Development of Uniform Methods of Pig Carcass Classification in the EC. Information on Agriculture Series no. 70. Brussels-Luxembourg: Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Committee on Medical Aspects of Food Policy (1984). Diet and Cardiovascular Disease. Report on Health and Social Subjects no. 28. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Conniffe, D. & Moran, M. A. (1972). Biometrics 28, 1011–1023.Google Scholar
Cook, G. L., Jones, D. W. & Kempster, A. J. (1983). Animal Production 36, 493–495.Google Scholar
Cross, H. R. (1983). American Meat Science Association, Carcass Composition Guidelines. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Reciprocal Meat Conference, North Dakota State University.Google Scholar
Diestre, A. & Kempster, A. J. (1985). Animal Production (In the Press) 41.Google Scholar
Evans, D. W. & Kempster, A. J. (1979). Animal Production 28, 97–108.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J. (1980). Meat Science 5, 83–98.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J. (1981). Livestock Production Science 8, 263–271.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J. (1983). Outlook on Agriculture 12, 147–152.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J. (1984). In In Vivo Measurement of Body Composition in Meat Animals, pp. 191–203 [Lister, D., editor]. London and New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Chadwick, J. P. & Jones, D. W. (1985). Animal Production 40, 323–329.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Croston, D. & Jones, D. W. (1981). Animal Production 33, 39–49.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. K., Cuthbertson, A. & Harrington, G. (1982). Carcase Evaluation in Livestock Breeding, Production and Marketing. London: Granada.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Cuthbertson, A. & Harrington, G. (1984). In Carcass Evaluation in Beef and Pork: Opportunities and Constraints. Proceedings of the Satellite Symposium to the EAAP, The Hague, 1984, pp. 21–29 [Walstra, P., editor]. Schoonoord, The Netherlands: IVO.Google Scholar
King, J. W. B. (1981). In In Vivo Estimation of Body Composition in Beef, Report on a Commission of the European Communities Workshop, Copenhagen, December 1981, pp. 86–93 [Bech Andersen, B., editor]. Publication no. 524. Copenhagen: Beretning fra Statens Husdyrbrugs forsøg.Google Scholar
Lister, D. (1984). In Vivo Measurements of Body Composition in Meat Animals. London and New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Simm, G., Avalos, E., Dingwall, W. S., King, J. W. B., Pratt, A. C., Owen, M. C. & Cuthbertson, A. (1985). Selection for improved lean meat production in Suffolk sheep: performance test regime and use of ultrasonics and X-ray computed tomography. British Society of Animal Production Winter Meeting.Google Scholar