In 2006, PS: Political Science and Politics published myriad
articles covering a vast range of topics. Symposia alone published in 2006
focused on inequality in American democracy, on the rejection of the EU
Constitution, on how the law affects the actions of department chairs, on
the methodology of field research in the Middle East, on voting gaps in
the 2004 election, on political corruption, and on the politics of Canada.
Upcoming symposia will focus on the U.S. military, on how to incorporate
the politics of the Iberian Peninsula into your syllabus, on the future of
state election reform, on Islamic extremism in Europe, and on the
importance of congressional leadership selection. And remember, these are
only the symposia. The journal's commitment to publishing articles on
pedagogy and on the profession, as well as exemplary topical scholarship
on a wide array of topics, calls for an equally broad stable of expert
reviewers. PS cannot publish such diverse work without the
outstanding work (and open-mindedness) of our peer reviewers. The
peer-review process relies on the professionalism and generosity of those
who contribute their time to read and evaluate the work of others. The
editors of PS thank the following scholars, who served as
manuscript reviewers between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2006. Very
special thanks go to those scholars whose names appear in bold; they
reviewed for PS in both 2005 and 2006.