Antidepressant effectiveness is a topic seldom out of the scientific or popular press, with claim and counter-claim about the disclosure, reporting, and interpretation of data. Hieronymus and colleagues1 have thrown their hats into the ring: noting that about half of company-sponsored trials failed to show any superiority over placebo, they challenge that most studies evaluated changes in total scores on the 17-point Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-17), but that this might mask improvement in important subcomponents. Not all items equally correlate with illness burden, so they undertook patient-level post hoc analyses focusing on the four-point depressed mood subcomponent in 18 placebo-controlled industry trials of various selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (n = 6669). The choice of this question was based on its diagnostic importance and the fact it had the highest baseline severity in the pooled sample. The result was that 91% of comparisons showed superiority of the active drug over placebo, compared with 46% where the summed scale was used (P<0.001). The authors argue that the summed scale is insensitive, and clouds current views on medications. The end of the debate? We think not …