We surveyed the views and experiences of all mental health professionals in adult community mental health teams and approved mental health professionals in 2Gether and Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trusts, regarding the use of community treatment orders (CTOs).

A total of 288 surveys were completed (response rate 48%). Forty-eight (83%) psychiatrists and 142 (67%) non-psychiatrist mental health professionals were in favour of CTOs. The decision-making regarding CTOs was overwhelmingly clinically oriented for all professional groups. However, there were significant differences in views between groups regarding the effects of bureaucracy, the infringement of human rights and coercion.

Multidisciplinary team involvement is crucial in decisions regarding CTOs and may protect against idiosyncratic or unhelpful practice. Further training for staff is urgently required and there may be a case for creating small local reference groups that can develop expertise and provide advice and support for clinical teams.

We audited prescribing within our area to ascertain how widespread the practice of antipsychotic polypharmacy using clozapine was, and whether it was being carried out within existing standards, including those of high-dose monitoring when required.

Data on 169 patients were reviewed in year one, rising to 193 in year three. Around 30% of patients on clozapine received additional antipsychotic medication. A disturbingly low proportion of patients on clozapine whose antipsychotic polypharmacy brought them into the high-dose range were being monitored appropriately after three audit cycles (the proportion rose from 10% in cycle 1 to 28% in cycle 3). A wide range of additional antipsychotic medications was used.

Clozapine antipsychotic polypharmacy was prevalent at just below a third of all patients in this review. Prescribers should be alert to the fact that clozapine antipsychotic polypharmacy can push patients into the high-dose range and ensure appropriate monitoring.

In 2006, staff in child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) in Lincolnshire, UK, felt that cases were becoming increasingly complex. The Pearce Case Complexity Scale (PCCS) and a staff opinions questionnaire were used to measure subjective and objective changes in case complexity in a relatively stable CAMHS service over a 10-year period from 1996 to 2006, with data examined between 2008 and 2010.

Clinicians reported an increase in case complexity over time. However, the PCCS did not show a significant change in the decade studied.

Staff anxiety could be a determinant of judgements they make about case complexity in CAMHS.