Review process
This journal uses a double-anonymous model of peer review. Neither author nor reviewers know the identity of each other.
Appeals
Appeals of editorial decisions will only be considered if they refer to a specific manuscript and must be based on evidence that either (1) an editor or reviewer made a significant factual error/a major misunderstanding of a manuscript, or (2) the integrity of the editorial decision making process was compromised.
If an author would like to formally appeal an editorial decision, they should contact the co-editors (at aralonso@unm.edu and jonathan.goldman@umontreal.ca) and specify the reason for their appeal. The appeal will be reviewed by the editorial team and the final decision will rest with the co-editors.