Article contents
Climato-economic habitats support patterns of human needs, stresses, and freedoms
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 August 2013
Abstract
This paper examines why fundamental freedoms are so unevenly distributed across the earth. Climato-economic theorizing proposes that humans adapt needs, stresses, and choices of goals, means, and outcomes to the livability of their habitat. The evolutionary process at work is one of collectively meeting climatic demands of cold winters or hot summers by using monetary resources. Freedom is expected to be lowest in poor populations threatened by demanding thermal climates, intermediate in populations comforted by undemanding temperate climates irrespective of income per head, and highest in rich populations challenged by demanding thermal climates. This core hypothesis is supported with new survey data across 85 countries and 15 Chinese provinces and with a reinterpretative review of results of prior studies comprising 174 countries and the 50 states in the United States. Empirical support covers freedom from want, freedom from fear, freedom of expression and participation, freedom from discrimination, and freedom to develop and realize one's human potential. Applying the theory to projections of temperature and income for 104 countries by 2112 forecasts that (a) poor populations in Asia, perhaps except Afghans and Pakistanis, will move up the international ladder of freedom, (b) poor populations in Africa will lose, rather than gain, relative levels of freedom unless climate protection and poverty reduction prevent this from happening, and (c) several rich populations will be challenged to defend current levels of freedom against worsening climato-economic livability.
Keywords
- Type
- Target Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013
References
- 129
- Cited by
Target article
Climato-economic habitats support patterns of human needs, stresses, and freedoms
Related commentaries (24)
Cold climates demand more intertemporal self-control than warm climates1
Contextual freedom: Absoluteness versus relativity of freedom
Cultural adaptation to environmental change versus stability
Cultural adaptations to the differential threats posed by hot versus cold climates
Ecological priming: Convergent evidence for the link between ecology and psychological processes
Extending climato-economic theory: When, how, and why it explains differences in nations' creativity
Frontier migration fosters ethos of independence: Deconstructing the climato-economic theory of human culture
Fundamental freedoms and the psychology of threat, bargaining, and inequality
How is freedom distributed across the earth?
Improving climato-economic theorizing at the individual level
Individual identity and freedom of choice in the context of environmental and economic conditions
Interpersonal exchange and freedom for resource acquisition
Is there a role for “climatotherapy” in the sustainable development of mental health?
Methodological suggestions for climato-economic theory
Personality traits, national character stereotypes, and climate–economic conditions
Play, animals, resources: The need for a rich (and challenging) comparative environment
Press freedom, oil exports, and risk for natural disasters: A challenge for climato-economic theory?
Shared adaptiveness is not group adaptation
Subtle variation in ambient room temperature influences the expression of social cognition
The need for psychological needs: A role for social capital
Toward an integrated, causal, and psychological model of climato-economics
Unsurprising, in a good way
What about politics and culture?
What is freedom–and does wealth cause it?
Author response
White, gray, and black domains of cultural adaptations to climato-economic conditions