Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T06:55:50.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contextual freedom: Absoluteness versus relativity of freedom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2013

Farzaneh Pahlavan  and
Ali Amirrezvani
Farzaneh Pahlavan
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Psychologie des Menaces sociales et environnementales, Institut de Psychologie, Université Paris Descartes, Boulogne-Billancourt, 92774, France. farzaneh.pahlavan@parisdescartes.frhttp://recherche.parisdescartes.fr/LPM/Notre-equipe/Enseignants-Chercheurs/Pahlavan-Farzaneh-Pr
Ali Amirrezvani
Affiliation:
Bio-Optical Oceanography Laboratory, Department of Marine Sciences, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez, PR 00681. ali.amirrezvani@upr.eduhttp://bio-optics.uprm.edu/people.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Our commentary is focused on the idea that “freedom” takes on its full significance whenever its relativistic nature, in the short- and long terms, is taken into account. Given the transformations brought about by “globalization,” application of a general model of freedom based on ecological-economic factors clearly seems to be rather untimely. We examine this idea through egocentric and ethnocentric views of the social and environmental analyses of “freedom.”

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 5 , October 2013 , pp. 498 - 499
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fincher, C. L., Thornhill, R., Murray, D. R. & Schaller, M. (2008) Pathogen prevalence predicts human cross-cultural variability in individualism/collectivism. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 275:1279–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lazarus, R. S. & Folkman, S. (1984) Stress, appraisal and coping. Springer.Google Scholar
Leander, N. P. & Chartrand, T. L. (2011) Nonconscious battles of will: Implicit reactions against the goals and motives of others. In: Social conflict and aggression, ed. Forgas, J., Kruglanski, A. & Williams, K.. New York Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Markus, H. R. (2008) Pride, prejudice, and ambivalence: Toward a unified theory of race and ethnicity. American Psychologist 63:651–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesquita, B. & Markus, H. R. (2004) Culture and emotion: Models of agency as sources of cultural variation in emotion. Détails disponibles uniquement. In: Feelings and emotions: The Amsterdam symposium, ed. Manstead, A. S. R., Frijda, N. & Fischer, A., pp. 341–58. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mischel, W. & Shoda, Y. (2010) The situated person. In: The mind in context, ed. Mesquita, B., Barrett, L. & Smith, E. R., pp. 149–73. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Moser, G. (2009) Sociability and environmental anchoring is Paris: From local attachment to urban identity. In: Global grounds: Urban change and globalization, ed. Nevarez, J. & Moser, G., pp. 123–35. Nova Science.Google Scholar
Smith, E. R. & Mackie, D. M. (1995) Social psychology. Worth.Google Scholar
Smith, E. R. & Semin, G. R. (2004) Socially situated cognition: Cognition in its social context. In: Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 36, ed. Zanna, M. P., pp. 53–117. Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tetlock, P. E. (2002) Social functionalist frameworks for judgment and choice: Intuitive politicians, theologians, and prosecutors. Psychological Review 109(3):451–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Triandis, H. C. (1995) Individualism and collectivism. Westview Press.Google Scholar