Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-44mx8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-22T05:19:43.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Limited evidence that fitness interdependence produces historical origin myths

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2025

Andreas Wimmer*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA andreas.wimmer@columbia.edu https://www.awimmer.com
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

This commentary points out some theoretical lacuna in the argument and then evaluates, in a preliminary way, its main comparative empirical hypotheses. It finds very limited support for the observable implications of the evolutionary theory. By contrast, the historical remoteness of foundational myths is closely associated with how long a society has been ruled by a centralized state, pointing at the important role of political history.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bockstette, V., Chanda, A., & Putterman, L. (2002). States and markets: The advantage of an early start. Journal of Economic Growth, 7, 347369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, E. (2015). Land, history or modernization? Explaining ethnic fractionalization. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38(2), 193210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimmer, A. (2018). Nation building. Why some countries come together while others fall apart. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wimmer, A., Cederman, L.-E., & Min, B. (2009). Ethnic politics and armed conflict. A configurational analysis of a new global dataset. American Sociological Review, 74(2), 316337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimmer, A., & Min, B. (2006). From empire to nation-state. Explaining wars in the modern world, 1816–2001. American Sociological Review, 71(6), 867897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar