Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T17:08:32.450Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How do we remember traumatic events? Exploring the role of neuromodulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2015

Daniele Ortu*
Affiliation:
Department of Behavior Analysis, University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76203-0919. daniele.ortu@unt.edu

Abstract

The seemingly puzzling datum that behavior decreases after punishing stimulation while individuals are still able to remember traumatic episodes is discussed in relation to dopaminergic and noradrenergic neuromodulation. The described mechanisms may contribute to an understanding of how occurrences of learning reconsolidation yield different outcomes across intra- and extra-therapeutic settings.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gaffan, D. (1985) Hippocampus: Memory, habit and voluntary movement. In: Animal intelligence ed. Weiskrantz, L., pp. 8799. Clarendon.Google Scholar
Gaffan, D. (2002) Against memory systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 357(1424):1111–21.Google Scholar
Kehoe, E. J. (1988) A layered network model of associative learning: Learning to learn and configuration. Psychological Review 95(4):411–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ortu, D. & Vaidya, M. (2013) A neurobiology of learning beyond the declarative non-declarative distinction. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 7. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00161.Google Scholar
Sara, S. J. (2009) The locus coeruleus and noradrenergic modulation of cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 10(3):211–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schultz, W. (2007) Behavioral dopamine signals. Trends in Neurosciences 30(5):203–10.Google Scholar