Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T17:06:09.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Beyond trait reductionism: Implications of network structures for dimensional models of psychopathology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Robert F. Bornstein*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Adelphi University, Garden City, NY 11530. bornstein@adelphi.eduhttp://www.adelphi.edu/faculty/profiles/profile.php?PID=0366

Abstract

Borsboom et al. discuss the implications of network structures for neurobiology-based reductionism, but inherent in the network approach is that dimensional models of psychopathology are untenable as well. Insofar as mental disorders are complex dynamic constellations of symptoms, the “trait reductionism” of dimensional psychopathology frameworks suffers from the same limitations as neurobiological reductionism.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bornstein, R. F. (2011) An interactionist perspective on interpersonal dependency. Current Directions in Psychological Science 20:124–28.Google Scholar
Bornstein, R. F. & Becker-Matero, N. (2011) Reconnecting psychoanalysis to mainstream psychology: Metaphor as glue. Psychoanalytic Inquiry 31:172–84.Google Scholar
Cromer, K. D. & Villodas, M. T. (2017) The role of posttraumatic stress as a pathway to psychopathology among youth at high risk for victimization. Psychology of Violence 7:1221.Google Scholar
Gargiulo, G. J. (1998) Meaning and metaphor in psychoanalytic education. Psychoanalytic Review 85:413–22.Google Scholar
Hallquist, M. N. & Pilkonis, P. A. (2012) Refining the phenotype of borderline personality disorder: Diagnostic criteria and beyond. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment 3(3):228–46.Google Scholar
Haslam, N., Holland, E. & Kuppens, P. (2012) Categories versus dimensions in personality and psychopathology: A quantitative review of taxometric research. Psychological Medicine 42:903–20.Google Scholar
Herpertz, S. C., Huprich, S. K., Bohus, M., Chanen, A., Goodman, M., Mehlum, L., Moran, P., Newton-Howes, G., Scott, L. & Sharp, C. (2017) The challenge of transforming the diagnostic system of personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders 31:577–89.Google Scholar
Hopwood, C. J. & Bornstein, R. F., eds. (2014) Multimethod clinical assessment. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Horvath, S. & Morf, C. C. (2009) Narcissistic defensiveness: Hypervigilance and avoidance of worthlessness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 25:1252–58.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, L. & Romero, D. (2016) Precision or imprecision medicine? Clinical Oncology 13:712–13.Google Scholar
Kotov, R., Krueger, R. F., Watson, D., Achenbach, T. M., Althoff, R. R., Bagby, R. M., Brown, T. A., Carpenter, W. T., Caspi, A., Clark, L. A., Eaton, N. R., Forbes, M. K., Forbush, K. T., Goldberg, D., Hasin, D., Hyman, S. E., Ivanova, M. Y., Lynam, D. R., Markon, K., Miller, J. D., Moffitt, T. E., Morey, L. C., Mullins-Sweatt, S. N., Ormel, J., Patrick, C. J., Regier, D. A., Rescorla, L., Ruggero, C. J., Samuel, D. B., Sellbom, M., Simms, L. J., Skodol, A. E., Slade, T., South, S. C., Tackett, J. L., Waldman, I. D., Waszczuk, M. A., Widiger, T. A., Wright, A. G. C. & Zimmerman, M. (2017) The hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology (HiTOP): A dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 126:454–77.Google Scholar
Krueger, R. F. & Markon, K. E. (2014) The role of the DSM-5 personality trait model in moving toward a quantitative and empirically based approach to classifying personality and psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 10:477501.Google Scholar
Lekkas, S. & Mikhailov, L. (2010) Evolving fuzzy medical diagnosis of Pima Indians diabetes and dermatological conditions. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 50:117–26.Google Scholar
Wright, A. G. C., Hopwood, C. J. & Simms, L. J. (2015) Daily interpersonal and affective dynamics in personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders 29:503–29.Google Scholar
Yun, R. J., Stern, B. L., Lenzenweger, M. F. & Tiersky, L. A. (2013) Refining personality disorder subtypes and classification using finite mixture modeling. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment 4:121–28.Google Scholar