In the present study, we assessed the sponge fauna, sponge-associated, and planktonic prokaryotic communities residing in Burgers' Zoo Ocean aquarium, Arnhem, the Netherlands. The Ocean aquarium consisted of separate displays and life support systems, and included fish-only systems in addition to a large, 750,000 L tank containing a living, tropical coral reef ecosystem. Sponges were observed throughout the aquarium system and were identified as belonging to the genera Chalinula, Chondrilla, Chondrosia, Cinachyrella, Stylissa, Suberites and Tethya. There was a highly significant difference in composition between sponge-associated and planktonic prokaryotic communities. The tanks in which the sponges were sampled appeared to have a secondary structural effect on prokaryotic composition with sponges and water from the same tanks sharing several microorganisms. Both sponge-associated and planktonic prokaryotic communities housed prokaryotic taxa, which were highly similar to microorganisms previously recorded in sponges or coral reef environments, including taxa potentially involved in nitrification, denitrification, sulphur oxidation, and antibiotic biosynthesis. Several abundant microorganisms were only recorded in sponges and these may play a role in maintaining water quality in the aquarium system. Potential pathogens, e.g. related to Photobacterium damselae, and beneficial organisms, e.g. related to Pseudovibrio denitrificans, were also detected. The present study showed that Burgers' Zoo Ocean aquarium housed diverse free-living and host-associated prokaryotic communities. Future research should focus on identifying conditions and microbial communities conducive to a healthy aquarium environment.

On five occasions in Pauline literature, the author claims to write in their own hand. In three of the five instances, the autograph is reserved for the final greeting and the greeting alone. In Galatians 6.11 and Philemon 19, however, Paul writes more than the letter's greeting in his own hand, as the comment about his autograph appears well before the closing salutations. This article engages one of these texts, Philemon, and argues that it was written entirely in Paul's hand. The letter was a Pauline holograph. To make this argument, the article first assesses the ‘cheirographic rhetoric’ of Philemon 19. Paul alludes to a type of documentary writing, the cheirograph, that recorded various sorts of financial proceedings. Paul's autographic guarantee recalls validation statements that were integral to this genre of text. Comparanda from the non-literary papyri show that when an author of a cheirograph called specific attention to their own handwriting, the entire document was customarily written in their own hand. The article then turns to the personal nature of Philemon and the abundance of second-person singular forms, arguing that there was a strong preference that personal letters like Philemon be handwritten in Paul's context. Taken together, these two arguments demonstrate that Paul's short letter to Philemon was more likely to be handwritten than dictated.

Consideration of XRD, TEM, AEM, and analytical data reported in the literature indicates that dioctahedral aluminous smectite and illite form two separate solid solutions that differ chemically from one another primarily by the extent of Al substitution for Si, the amount of interlayer K, and the presence of interlayer H2O. The data indicate that limited dioctahedral-trioctahedral and dioctahedral-vacancy compositional variations occur in both minerals. Excluding interlayer H2O and based on a half unit cell [i.e., O10(OH)2], natural dioctahedral smectite and illite solid solutions fall within the compositional limits represented by A0.3${\rm{R}}_{1.9}^{3 + }$Si4O10(OH)2-AR2+ R3+ Si4O10(OH)2-A0.25${\rm{R}}_{0.3}^{2 + }{\rm{R}}_{1.8}^{3 + }$Al0.25Si3.75O10(OH)2 for smectites and A0.8${\rm{R}}_{1.9}^{3 + }$Al0.5Si3.5O10(OH)2-A0.55${\rm{R}}_{0.45}^{2 + }{\rm{R}}_{1.55}^{3 + }$Al0.1Si3.9O10(OH)2-A0.9${\rm{R}}_{0.3}^{2 + }{\rm{R}}_{1.8}^{3 + }$Al0.9Si3.1O10(OH)2 for illites, where A represents either monovalent cations or divalent cations expressed as their monovalent equivalent (e.g., Ca2+/2); R2+ stands for the divalent cations Mg2+ and Fe2+ and R3+ refers to the trivalent cations Al3+ and Fe3+. Taking account of these compositional limits, smectite and illite solid solutions can be described in terms of nine and six thermodynamic components, respectively, all of which are consistent with both the law of definite proportions and the concept of a unit cell. Thermodynamic components that can be used to describe natural smectite solid solutions in terms of a half unit cell [i.e., O10(OH)2] can be expressed as NaAl3Si3O10(OH)2, NaAl3Si3O10(OH)2 ·4.5H2O, Al2Si4O10(OH)2, Fe2Si4O10(OH)2, Mg3Si4O10(OH)2, Fe3Si4O10(OH)2, K3AlSi4O10(OH)2, KAl3Si3O10(OH)2, and Ca0.5Al3Si3O10(OH)2. Of these, NaAl3Si3O10(OH)2 ·4.5H2O provides explicitly for the presence of interlayer H2O in the mineral. Thermodynamic components representing illite solid solutions in natural systems can be written for a half unit cell as KAl3Si3O10(OH)2, KMg3AlSi3O10(OH)2, KFe3AlSi3O10(OH)2, Al2Si4O10(OH)2, KFe2AlSi3O10(OH)2, and K3AlSi4O10(OH)2. The calculations and observations summarized below indicate that neither smectite nor illite occur in nature as stoichiometric phases and that the two minerals do not form a mutual solid solution corresponding to mixed-layered illite/smectite.

Chlorite minerals, found in a great variety of rocks and geological environments, display a wide range of chemical compositions and a variety of polytypes, which reflect the physicochemical conditions under which they formed. Of particular importance for studies dealing with ore deposit genesis, metamorphism, hydrothermal alteration or diagenesis is the paleotemperature of chlorite crystallization. However, in order to understand the relationship between chlorite composition and formation temperature and hence use chlorite as a geothermometer, one must determine how other parameters influence chlorite composition. These parameters may include fO2 and pH of the solution and Fe/(Fe + Mg) and bulk mineral composition of the host rock.

Four approaches to chlorite geothermometry, one structural and three compositional, have been proposed in the past: 1) a polytype method based on the (largely qualitative) observation that structural changes in chlorite may be partly temperature-dependent (Hayes, 1970); 2) an empirical calibration between the tetrahedral aluminum occupancy in chlorites and measured temperature in geothermal systems (Cathelineau, 1988), which has subsequently been modified by several workers; 3) a six-component chlorite solid solution model based upon equilibrium between chlorite and an aqueous solution, which uses thermodynamic properties calibrated with data from geothermal and hydrothermal systems (Walshe, 1986); and 4) a theoretical method based on the intersection of chlorite-carbonate reactions and the CO2-H2O miscibility surface in temperature-XCO2 space, which requires that the composition of a coexisting carbonate phase (dolomite, ankerite, Fe-calcite or siderite) be known or estimated (Hutcheon, 1990). These four approaches are reviewed and the different calculation methods for the compositional geothermometers are applied to a selection of chlorite analyses from the literature. Results of this comparative exercise indicate that no single chlorite geothermometer performs satisfactorily over the whole range of natural conditions (different temperatures, coexisting assemblages, Fe/(Fe + Mg), fO2, etc.). Therefore, chlorite geothermometry should be used with caution and only in combination with alternative methods of estimating paleotemperatures.

This study describes a new variety of chalcedony with a unique inhomogeneous bluish green hue, named aquaprase. It was discovered in Africa and is considered to be a valuable addition to the gem trade. A multi-methodological approach was used to examine its chemistry, mineralogy and microstructure, which were then compared to those of chrysoprase and agate, two of the most popular varieties of chalcedony. Optical microscopy revealed a complex microstructural heterogeneity in the different colour intensity areas/bands of aquaprase and agate, whereas chrysoprase exhibited a more homogeneous coexistence of micro- and cryptocrystalline quartz. High-resolution synchrotron XRD was essential for highlighting the complex assemblage of various types of α-quartz in aquaprase and agate (which differ in terms of crystal size and/or cell parameters). Micro-Raman spectroscopy revealed α-quartz and moganite in all three varieties of chalcedony and the presence of the nickel-bearing layered silicate mineral, willemseite, in chrysoprase, which is responsible for its green colouration. The chemical analysis displayed a homogeneous composition of agate, as well as high levels of nickel content in the chrysoprase variety. Aquaprase showed significant amounts (ppm by weight) of trace elements (Al, Mg, Na, K, Ca, Ti, U and Fe) characteristic of its formation environment, as well as high values of Cr, which are thought to be the cause of its bluish green colouration.

Heflikite, the first Sc-dominant epidote-supergroup mineral, was discovered in two occurrences. The holotype was found in a granitic pegmatite associated with rodingite-like calc-silicate rocks and metasomatised granitic bodies exposed in a serpentinite quarry at Jordanów Śląski near Sobótka, Lower Silesia, SW Poland. The cotype comes from the Heftetjern pegmatite, Tørdal region, Norway. The holotype is composed of (in wt.%): 35.69 SiO2, 0.22 TiO2, 21.98 Al2O3, 6.12 Sc2O3, 0.07 V2O3, 1.10 Fe2O3, 0.11 Y2O3, 1.55 La2O3, 4.05 Ce2O3, 0.31 Pr2O3, 1.53 Nd2O3, 0.40 Sm2O3, 0.11 EuO, 0.56 Gd2O3, 0.14 MnO, 3.56 FeO, 0.16 MgO, 19.16 CaO and 1.78 H2O(+)calc.; total 98.60. The cotype contains: 34.92 SiO2, 0.44 TiO2, 0.82 SnO2, 19.13 Al2O3, 4.79 Sc2O3, 1.96 Fe2O3, 2.55 La2O3, 7.39 Ce2O3, 0.48 Pr2O3, 0.67 Nd2O3, 0.12 EuO, 0.61 Gd2O3, 0.13 MnO, 5.97 FeO, 17.66 CaO and 1.73 H2O(+)calc.; total 99.37. The compositions correspond to the following empirical formulae: (Ca1.729Ce0.125La0.048Nd0.046Gd0.016Sm0.012Pr0.010Y0.005Eu2+0.003)Σ1.994[(Al2.182Sc0.449Fe3+0.070V3+0.005)Σ2.706(Fe2+0.251Mg0.020Mn0.010)Σ0.281Ti0.014]Σ3.001(Si3.006O11)O(OH) and (Ca1.644Ce0.235La0.082Nd0.021Gd0.018Pr0.015Eu2+0.004)Σ1.019[(Al1.958Sc0.362Fe3+0.128)Σ2.448(Fe2+0.434Mn0.009)Σ0.443(Ti0.029Sn0.029)Σ0.058]Σ2.949(Si3.033O11)O(OH), respectively, and to the ideal formula Ca2(Al2Sc)(Si2O7)(SiO4)O(OH). The crystal structure of the holotype was refined in the monoclinic system with an R1 index of 8.62%. The crystal-structure refinement indicates exclusively Si occupied T sites, Al occupied M1 and M2 sites, and a Ca occupied A1 site. The M3 site is filled predominantly by trivalent cations, mainly Sc3+, with divalent cations (mainly Fe2+) as minor occupants. The A2 site is filled mostly by Ca with minor amounts of rare earth elements (REE). The holotype heflikite crystallised from metasomatic fluids that infiltrated a contact between the granitic pegmatite and the surrounding rodingite-type calc-silicate rocks and serpentinites. The fluids that introduced Sc into the pegmatite could have been either hydrothermal or related to low-grade regional metamorphism that postdated the formation of the pegmatite. The cotype heflikite formed during the late-stage hydrothermal crystallisation of the Sc-enriched granitic pegmatite.

The objective of this paper is to describe the new serpentine group mineral, guidottiite, which is analogous to cronstedtite. Guidottiite has an ideal chemical composition of (Mn2Fe3+)(SiFe3+)O5(OH)4. The sample is from the N’chwaning 2 mine, Kalahari manganese field, Republic of South Africa, and apparently forms from hydrothermal solutions. Grains are optically near opaque [average index of refraction 1.765, with variable extinction on the (001)], vitreous, and black, with perfect {001} platy cleavage. A non-separable fibrous substructure exists perpendicular to cleavage that results in a silky luster under optical examination. The average chemical analysis determined from electron microprobe based on four grains with ten analyses each resulted in a structural formula of (Mn1.86Fe0.613+Mg0.54)Σ=3.01(Si1.36Fe0.643+)Σ=2.00O5(OH)4, with calculated density of 3.236 g/cm3. Analysis from another area of the sample showed a slightly different chemical composition and resulted in a formula of (Mn1.70Fe0.963+Mg0.24Σ=2.89(Si1.26Fe0.743+)Σ=2.00O5(OH)4, with calculated density of 3.291 g/cm3. The measured density on a bulk sample (with impurities) was 3.33 g/cm3. Thermal analysis suggested a dehydroxylation temperature of 535°C, a decomposition/recrystallization temperature of 722°C, and weight loss (= H2O loss) of 9.4%. The derived Mohs hardness from nano-indentation is H = 4.25.

The sample is mostly the 2H1 polytype with minor amounts of the 2H2 polytype. Using a predominantly 2H2 crystal, which has better crystallinity, the strongest observed X-ray peaks are: 7.21 Å (Io/Io = 100%), 3.543 (50), 2.568 (39), 1.982 (26), and 2.381 (25). All Gandolfi simulations, even with three crystal remountings, showed preferred orientation effects. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) analysis showed stacking disorder within Group D serpentine polytypes. Thus, a regular alternation of the occupancy of octahedral sets within each layer along the stacking exists, but disorder of the layer displacements of 0 and ±b/3 (b defined here as the orthohexagonal cell) exists. Ordered 2H1 (no layer displacement) and 2H2 (alternating + and —b/3 displacement) domains were also frequently observed. X-ray diffraction analysis showed that even apparent single crystals contain impurity phases, presumably Mn-rich and Ca phases that were detected in the microprobe study. The single-crystal structure refinement used a well (stacking) ordered apparent 2H2 crystal with little to no streaking in the diffraction pattern. Results showed that the crystal has a random interstratification of 2H2 and 2H1. The 2H2 polytype is hexagonal, space group P63, with a = 5.5472(3), c = 14.293(2) Å, and Z = 2, and was refined to R1 = 0.072 and wR = 0.108 from 656 unique reflections. Because the two polytypes in the composite have only small differences in the lower 1:1 layer, a large displacement parameter for the basal oxygen atom results, which was constrained to B = 1.5 Å2 (Ueq = 0.0190) in the refinement. Half of the tetrahedral sites in the 2H1 upper layer superpose over half of the tetrahedral sites in the 2H2 upper layer (T1 sites only) per unit cell. This superposition produces an apparent excess of electron densities of the T1 site relative to the T2 site (T1 = 21.9 electrons, T2 = 15.8). Comparison with the microprobe data indicates that observed tetrahedral bond lengths are generally not affected by this intergrowth. Tetrahedral bond lengths indicated that the tetrahedral sites contain T1 = Si0.678 Fe0.3223+ and T2 = Si0.631Fe0.3693+. This excess of electron densities and other refinement problems associated with the guidottiite single-crystal refinement closely parallel all single-crystal cronstedtite-2H2 refinements to date, suggesting that these refinements also involve random interstratifications of 2H2 and 2H1 polytypes.

In spite of decades of research on the subject, the crystal structure of illite is still poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to address this problem by investigating the nature of the interlayer content in illite IMt-2 from Silver Hill, Montana, using analytical transmission electron microscopy (ATEM), thermogravimetry (TG), and X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) analyses. The ATEM data, together with literature and TG results, yielded the formula K0.70a0.01(H2O)0.42 (Al1.53Fe2+0.06Fe3+0.19Mg0.28)Σ−2.06(Si3.44Al0.56)O10(OH)2 or, assuming the presence of H3O+, K0.69Na0.01(H3O)+0.28(Al1.47Fe2+0.06Fe3+0.19Mg0.28)Σ−1.99(Si3.40Al0.60)O10(OH)2. The first formula indicates surplus interlayer and octahedral species, whereas the second shows no excess. The XRPD data were refined by Rietveld techniques, down to an Rp factor of 10.48–13.8%. The mineral composition consists largely of illite-2M1, illite-1M, and minor quartz. Although the refinement accuracy is limited by the intrinsic poor quality diffraction of the illites, the partially refined model is consistent with the chemical composition; in particular, attempts to introduce octahedral cations in excess of 2 were fruitless. All the results support the simple structural model, by which the illite structure strictly corresponds to a dioctahedral mica with H3O+ replacing K. As a consequence, the crystalchemical formula of illites should be calculated on the basis of six tetrahedral plus octahedral cations.

The arguments of Vidal et al. (2010) against the incorporation of H3O+ rather than of H2O in the interlayer position of illite are disputable. Stoichiometric arguments do indeed suggest that the excess water in the Silver Hill illite is in the formof H3O+. No reason exists to assume less water content in the IMt-2 sample than in those determined by Hower and Mowatt (1966) and confirmed by the thermogravimetric analyses of Nieto et al. (2010). The comparison between element contents calculated from end-members and those from the structural formula in figure 1 of Vidal et al. (2010) is not an experimental result, but rather a trivial mathematical artifact. The fact that thermodynamic models, based on the incorporation of interlayer H2O in illite, may provide reasonable estimates neither proves nor disproves the presence of H3O+; this is because thermodynamics is a non-atomistic, macroscopic approach.

The arguments of Nieto et al. (2010) in favor of the incorporation of H3O+ rather than H2O in interlayer positions of illite are disputable. Stoichiometric arguments suggest that the excess water in the Silver Hill illite is in the form of H2O. Moreover, recent thermodynamic models assuming the incorporation of interlayer H2O in illite provide reasonable estimates of temperature and water content using the AEM/TEM analyses of Nieto et al. (2010).