Objective - assessment of the burden perceived by a sample of key-relatives of schizophrenic patients. Design - Observational study of key-relatives of patients with a PSE-CATEGO diagnosis of active paranoid schizophrenia. Assessment of possible correlations between the family burden, the patients' symptoms and disabilities, as well as the relatives attitude of overinvolvement and criticism. Setting - Inpatient and outpatient psychiatric units of the Department of Psychiatry of the First Medical School, University of Naples. Subjects - 25 patients, with a diagnosis of active paranoid schizophrenia, according to ICD-9 diagnostic criteria, minimun illness history 1 year, at least one previous admission, living with at least one adult relative. Main outcome measures - Standardized assessment of patients clinical status and social disability and of relatives clinical status attitude and perceived burden. Results - The burden, both objective and subjective, was found to be present to a marked or very marked degree in more than 50% of the inteviewed relatives. A marked effect of the patients illness was observed especially on relatives social contacts and leisure activities. Also the attitudes of criticism and overinvolvement were detected in the great majority of the relatives. 52% of the relatives, when assessed by the PSE-9, received a psychiatric diagnosis. The objective burden was found to be associated with some «negative» symptoms and deficits of social functioning in the patients. Finally, significant correlations were observed between the objective and subjective dimensions of the burden and the relatives attitudes of hypercriticism toward the patients. Conclusions - The present study seems to be relevant both from the epidemiological point of view and for psychiatric care planning.

Objective – This study aimed to describe: a) the interventions received by patients with schizophrenia attending Italian mental health services (MHS); b) the relatives' burden and social network and the professional support received by the families. Design – The study has been carried out in 30 MHS, randomly selected and stratified by geographic areas and population density. 25 patients with a DSM–IV diagnosis of schizophrenia and 25 relatives were recruited in each MHS. Family burden was evaluated in relation to: a) geographic area; b) interventions received by the patients; c) social and professional sup– port received by the families. Main outcome measures – a) patients: Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and Disability Assessment Interview (AD); b) key-relatives: Family Problems Questionnaire (QPF) and Social Network Questionnaire (QRS); c) interventions received by the patients and their families: Scheda di Rilevazione degli Interventi – Pattern of Care Schedule (SRI). Results – Data on 709 patients and their key-relatives were collected. In the two months preceding the data collection, 35% of patients attended rehabilitative programmes; 80% of the families were in regular contact with the MHS and 8% received family psychoeducational interventions. Family burden was higher in Southern than in Central and Northern Italy. This difference disappeared when rehabilitative interventions and family support were provided. Conclusions – This study highlights that the situation of the families of patients with schizophrenia is more burdensome in Southern Italy and is greatly influenced by the type of interventions provided by the MHS.

Objective — To evaluate psychopathological symptoms, disabilities and family burden in schizophrenic patients and to analyse predictors of family burden and relatives' satisfaction. Design — Descriptive study of 203 patients with an ICD 10 — F2 diagnosis (schizophrenia and related disorders) in contact with the Desio Department of Mental Health on 31st December 1994. Setting — The Desio Department of Mental Health. Main outcome measures — The patients have been evaluated in three areas: disability (by ADC-DAS), psychiatric symptoms (by 24 items BPRS) and family burden (by Family Problems questionnaire). The outpatient, hospital and residential care contacts of the patients have been collected for six months by our service information system. For each area (DAS, BPRS and FP) a principal component analysis and a rotation of the significant components have been performed. Eleven factors, derived from three scales, have been retained as explanatory variables. Finally, a multiple regression analysis has been performed to assess the influence of explanatory variables on the set of response variables regarding family burden and relatives' satisfaction. Results — One third of patients suffer of moderate-severe positive symptoms, while negative symptoms are less frequent.

Objective Description of burden, attitudes and received professional support in a sample of relatives of patients with schizophrenia, recruited in 8 Italian Mental Health Sservices (MHS), stratified by geographic areas and population density.Design - Cross-sectional study on key-relatives of clinically stable patients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia. Evaluation of: a) relationships of family burden with patient's clinical characteristics, family's sociodempgraphic variables, relative's attitudes toward the patient, professional and social support received by the family; b) differences in the levels of burden, attitudes and support received by the family with respect to geographical area and population density.Setting - 8 Italian MHS stratified by geographic areas (Northern, Central, Southern Italy) and population density (urban vs. rural areas).Main outcome measures - Patient's clinical status and social functioning: BPRS and ADC. Family burden, attitudes and support received by the family: FPQ.Results - Data on 144 patients and their key-relatives were collected. Higher levels of burden were found among relatives referring to Southern MHS. The burden was found positively correlated with the levels of patients' BPRS positive and manic/hostility symptoms and disability, and with the number of daily hours spent by the relative in contact with the patient, and negatively correlated with the levels of professional support received by the family. Conclusions - The results of this study highlight the need to provide rehabilitative programmes for patients with schizophrenia as well as informative and psychoeducational interventions for their families.