We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The fact that opioids constrict the pupil is known to healthcare workers and the lay public. In this chapter, the mechanism of this effect is discussed and how an understanding of this mechanism can be useful to the clinician. There are many parameters that can be measured from the pupil with portable pupillometers. The measure that most closely predicts the onset of severe respiratory depression is pupillary unrest in ambient light (PUAL). This measure is compared to pupil size and pupillary constriction amplitude as a measure of toxic levels of opioids.
Trained in addictions in Edinburgh, perhaps an easier specialty given personal experience. Then obtained a consultant post in the Scottish Borders, and a year later one in Edinburgh.
In a “mixed bag” 2023-2024 session, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a series of decisions both favorable and antithetical to public health and safety. Taking on tough constitutional issues implicating gun control, misinformation, and homelessness, the Court also avoided substantive reviews in favor of procedural dismissals in key cases involving reproductive rights and government censorship.
Managing oral pain is a daily task for dental practitioners. Understanding the type of pain, accurately diagnosing the cause and being able to choose the most appropriate drug regimen (if required) is a fundamental skill for all dentists. This chapter describes the medicines commonly used for pain management in dentistry, their mechanism of action, appropriate doses, adverse effects, common drug interactions and their place in therapy.
U.S. law imposes strict recording and reporting requirements on all entities that manufacture and distribute controlled substances. As a result, the prescription opioid crisis has unfolded in a data-saturated environment. This article asks why the systematic documentation of opioid transactions failed to prevent or mitigate the crisis. Drawing on a recently disclosed trove of 1.4 million internal records from Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, a leading manufacturer of prescription opioids, we highlight a phenomenon we propose to call data diversion, whereby data ostensibly generated or collected for the purpose of regulating the distribution of controlled substances were repurposed by the industry for the opposite aim of increasing sales at all costs. Systematic data diversion, we argue, contributed substantially to the scale of drug diversion seen with opioids and should become a focus of policy intervention.
Elucidation of the interaction of biological and psychosocial/environmental factors on opioid dependence (OD) risk can inform our understanding of the etiology of OD. We examined the role of psychosocial/environmental factors in moderating polygenic risk for opioid use disorder (OUD).
Methods
Data from 1958 European ancestry adults who participated in the Yale-Penn 3 study were analyzed. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) were based on a large-scale multi-trait analysis of genome-wide association studies (MTAG) of OUD.
Results
A total of 420 (21.1%) individuals had a lifetime diagnosis of OD. OUD PRS were positively associated with OD (odds ratio [OR] 1.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21–1.66). Household income and education were the strongest correlates of OD. Among individuals with higher OUD PRS, those with higher education level had lower odds of OD (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.85–0.98); and those with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) were more likely to have OD relative to those without PTSD (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.04–2.35).
Conclusions
Results suggest an interplay between genetics and psychosocial environment in contributing to OD risk. While PRS alone do not yet have useful clinical predictive utility, psychosocial factors may help enhance prediction. These findings could inform more targeted clinical and policy interventions to help address this public health crisis.
A class of analgesics structurally similar to the natural alkaloids derived from the resin of the opium poppy. Natural alkaloids are known as opiates and they include morphine and other similarly structured drugs, such as codeine, hydrocodone, and oxycodone. Synthetic derivates include hydromorphone, fentanyl, and heroin, among others (3). Three opiate receptors – µ, ?, and d – were found predominantly in the CNS. Most analgesic effect of opioids is mediated by the µ receptor. Decrease presynaptic calcium influx and increase postsynaptic potassium efflux, leading to inhibition of neuronal firing and neurotransmitter release.
Sickle cell crisis is a term used to capture myriad acute manifestations of sickle cell disease (SCD). Underlying pathophysiology is due to polymerization of HbS, sickling of erythrocytes, and microvascular occlusion and injury. Sickle cell disease and related pain is common in the US, especially among black Americans. Routine newborn screening picks up the majority of cases and helps guide prevention and treatment of acute pain crises early on. The mainstay of treating vaso-occlusive crises is analgesia and is often achieved with NSAIDs, opioids, or combination therapy.
Pain is quite common in patients with cancer, especially those with metastaticdisease. Oncologic pain implications: decreased quality of life, can be an indicator of the progression of a tumor, and psychosocial effects such as anxiety and depression. Cancer pain is divided into acute form and chronic form. Advances have been made in both oncology and pain management. The application of pain management into clinical oncology is still a work in progress. Pain management that is sufficient and consistent is difficult in cancer patients. Cancer pain affects a large portion of those with cancerous disease processes. Metastatic disease tends to be associated with more pain. Pain can come from the cancer itself or from the treatment. More work is needed to standardize the evaluation and treatment of cancer pain. Further work is needed to take into account each individual’s unique circumstance.
In 2022, the Camden Coalition Medical-Legal Partnership began providing civil and criminal legal services to substance use disorder patients at Cooper University Health Care’s Center for Healing. This paper discusses early findings from the program’s first year on the efficacy of the provision of criminal-legal representation, which is uncommon among MLPs and critical for this patient population. The paper concludes with takeaways for other programs providing legal services in an addiction medicine setting.
Chapter 8 contains an in-depth case study of the opioid mass tort litigation in federal and state courts. It describes the inception and development of the opioid drug crisis and how the opioid crisis affected state and local municipalities, in requiring additional expenditures of money to provide medical, policing, and various social services to communities affected by the crisis. The chapter describes the initiation of opiod litigation, the hundreds of lawsuit, consolidation and transfer of all the opioid litigation into a federal MDL under Judge Dan Polsters supervision in the Northern District of Ohio. The chapter chronicles the management and litigation in the federal MDL proceedings and Judge Polsters approval of a public nuisance claim which actually went to trial. The chapter narrates the resulting, cascading opioid settlements with opioid manufacturers, distributors, and pharmacies concurrent with and after the MDL bellwether public nuisance trial. The chapter further chronicles the fate of opioid public nuisance in state courts, with a notable rejection of a public nuisance claim by the Oklahoma Supreme Court. The chapter ends by documenting the many state court opioid settlements during 2021-2022.
Methadone, a medication used to treat opioid use disorder (OUD), has resulted in decreased opioid overdose deaths, while increasing treatment retention and lowering the rates of infectious diseases associated with intravenous substance use. Access to methadone is limited in the United States due to federal laws and regulatory policies that are rooted in racist “criminal justice approaches” to substance use. Unlike other controlled prescription medications, methadone is subject to restrictions on the number of doses a person can receive at any given time, known as “take-home doses” (THDs). Federal regulations mandate that patients receiving methadone must travel to government-certified clinics known as opioid treatment programs (OTPs) almost daily to receive medication for at least the first 90 days of treatment. Due to the need to practice social distancing during COVID-19, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) – the regulatory agency which sets the accreditation standards for OTPs – released a federal waiver in March 2020 granting significant exemptions to THD regulations. Thousands of patients have now received increased THDs, a historic and impactful shift in care for people with OUD. This chapter begins with an overview of the regulation of methadone for OUD before COVID-19. Next, it reviews the evidence for regulatory reform alongside our analysis of qualitative data we collected during COVID-19 that reflects patients’ experiences with increased access to THDs. Based on the findings of our qualitative study and the empirical literature, we conclude the chapter with recommendations for modifications of THD regulations.
Opioid misuse is now a worldwide epidemic and major public health issue with widespread implications. This fascinating book provides a collection of compelling arguments on how the course of the opioid epidemic can be changed. It offers an overview of the historical origins of opioid addiction, a summary of the current state of the worldwide epidemic and an examination of the likelihood of success for current and proposed solutions. Specific chapters focus on why some people are affected by addiction, the effect of policy and regulations, changing trends in opioid use, detoxification, the financial cost of addiction treatment, and proactive measures to prevent addiction. Drawing upon both past and current academic research as well as personal accounts, ideas and concepts are presented in a clear and accessible narrative. This book is a convenient single source of information for healthcare professionals, students and individuals personally affected by opioid addiction.
Advances in translational science require innovative solutions, and engagement of productive transdisciplinary teams play a critical role. While various forms of scientific meetings have long provided venues for sharing scientific findings and generating new collaborations, many conferences lack opportunities for active discussions. We describe the use of an Un-Meeting to foster innovative translational science teams through engaged discussions across multidisciplinary groups addressing a shared theme. The Un-Meeting was delivered by the University of Rochester Center for Leading Innovation and Collaboration, the national coordinating center for the National Institutes of Health Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) program. This pilot CTSA program Un-Meeting focused on engaging translational scientists, policy-makers, community members, advocates, and public health professionals to address the opioid crisis. The participant-driven format leveraged lightning talks, attendee-led idea generation, and extensive breakout discussions to foster multidisciplinary networking. Results indicated participation by a broad set of attendees and a high level of networking during the meeting. These results, coupled with the growth of the Un-Meeting across the CTSA Consortium, provide practices and models to potentially advance team and translational science. While future work will further assess the impact of Un-Meetings, this format presents a promising approach to enhance translational science.
Opioid agonist treatment, including methadone, is the safest and most effective method for treating opioid use disorders and reduces opioid overdose deaths. While access to methadone is highly regulated by federal law, a substantial portion of states impose stricter barriers.
Studies of the brain inform us about the cognitive abilities of animals and hence affect the extent to which animals of that species are respected. However, they can also tell us how an individual is likely to be perceiving, attending to, evaluating, coping with, enjoying, or disturbed by its environment, and so can give direct information about welfare. In studies of welfare, we are especially interested in how an individual feels. Since this depends upon high-level brain processing, we have to investigate brain function. Brain correlates of preferred social, sexual and parental situations include elevated oxytocin in the para-ventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus. Abnormal behaviour may have brain correlates, for example, high frequencies of stereotypy are associated with down-regulated μ and κ receptors and dopamine depletion in the frontal cortex. Such results help in evaluating the effects of treatment on welfare. Some brain changes, such as increased glucocorticoid receptors in the frontal lobes or increased activity in the amygdala, may be a sensitive indicator of perceived emergency. Active immunological defences lead to cytokine production in the brain, vagal nerve activity and sickness effects. Some aspects of brain function can be temporarily suppressed, for example, by opioids when there is severe pain, or permanently impaired, for example, in severely impoverished environments or during depression. Coping attempts or environmental impact can lead to injury to the brain, damage to hippocampal neurons, remodelling of dendrites in the hippocampus, or to other brain disorganisation. Brain measures can explain the nature and magnitude of many effects on welfare.
Nonmedical opioid use (NMOU) has been associated with opioid overdose deaths. This pattern of misuse can be seen in those using opioids for cancer-associated pain. We present a case that highlights the complexities associated with NMOU and a patient’s care at the end of life.
Cases Description
A patient with a metastatic solid tumor malignancy along with co-occurring history of polysubstance abuse was admitted to an acute palliative and supportive care unit (APSCU). The patient demonstrated behaviors concerning for NMOU during her hospital stay but had increased symptom expression concerning for worsening dyspnea while in the APSCU. Unfortunately, she used home opioids, which was unknown to the team at the time along with requesting for higher doses of opioids that were being prescribed. This caused a worsening respiratory status and affected her care. Using an interdisciplinary approach, the providers managed her symptoms and discharged her safely to see her child.
Conclusion
This highlights the complexities of the alleviation of suffering in those with NMOU. It is important to continue to manage NMOU at the end of life due to its effects on quality of life. A multimodal approach is recommended to identify and care for these patients.
As the opioid epidemic continues in the United States and ongoing litigation seeks to hold contributors responsible, state governments have initiated lawsuits against retail pharmacies for their role in contributing to the crisis. This article summarizes an action the State of West Virginia brought against CVS, which the parties recently settled in the fall of 2022. This article examines the unique position of retail pharmacies like CVS, which often serve as both distributors and dispensers, in contributing to the oversaturation and illicit diversion of opioid prescriptions. The article concludes by assessing the viability of potential causes of action against retail pharmacies in opioid litigation.
Physicians’ fear of criminal prosecution for prescribing opioid analgesics is a major reason why many chronic pain patients are having an increasingly difficult time obtaining medically appropriate pain relief. In Ruan v. United States, 142 S. Ct. 2370 (2022), the Supreme Court unanimously vacated two federal convictions under the Controlled Substances Act. The Court held that the government must prove that the defendant knowingly or intentionally acted in an unauthorized manner.
Patients with various ailments present to hospital with pain. This chapter defines pain and explores the assessment and the fundamental pathophysiology behind this common symptom. Pain can be managed using various pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods including interventional techniques. This chapter also explains the principles of management of acute pain in chronic pain patients on long term opioids and the problem of chronic post-surgical pain.