Most dynamic ice-sheet studies currently use either empirically based
parameterizations or simple energy-balance climate models for the surface
mass-balance forcing. If three-dimensional global climate models (GCMs)
could be used instead, they would greatly improve the potential realism of
coupled climate ice-sheet simulations. However, there are two serious
problems in simulating realistic mass balances on ice sheets from GCM
simulations: (i) dynamic ice-sheet models and the underlying bedrock
topography need horizontal resolution of 50–100 km or less, but the finest
practical resolution of atmospheric GCMs is currently ˜250 km, and (ii) GCM
surface physics usually neglects the local refreezing of meltwater on ice
sheets.
Two techniques are described that address these problems: an elevation
correction applied to the atmospheric GCM fields interpolated to the
ice-sheet grid, and a refreezing correction involving the annual totals of
snowfall, rainfall and local melt at each grid-point. As an example of their
use, we have used the GENESIS version 2 GCM at 3.75° × 3.75° resolution to
simulate the climate at the end of the last interglaciation at ˜116 000
years ago. The atmospheric climate is then used to drive a standard
two-dimensional dynamic ice-sheet model for 10 000 years on a 0.5° × 0.5°
grid spanning northern North America. The model successfully predicts
ice-sheet initiation over the Baffin Island highlands and the Canadian
Archipelago, but at a slower rate than observed. A large ice sheet nucleates
and grows rapidly over the northwestern Rockies, in conflict with geologic
evidence. Possible reasons for these discrepancies are discussed.