No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Do we need the inherence heuristic to explain the bias towards inherent explanations?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 October 2014
Abstract
It is clear that people often make unwarranted inherence-based explanations, but it is less clear that explaining this fact requires the inherence heuristic. Instead, it can be explained by a more general explanatory apparatus operating on the most readily available information, which, depending on the nature of that information, outputs both inherent and noninherent explanations.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014
References
Gilbert, D. T., Pelham, B. W. & Krull, D. S. (1988) On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
54:733–40.Google Scholar
Krull, D. S. & Dill, J. C. (1996) On thinking first and responding fast: Flexibility in social inference processes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
22(9):949–59.Google Scholar
Krull, D. S. & Erickson, D. J. (1995) Judging situations: On the effortful process of taking dispositional information Into account. Social Cognition
13(4):417–38. doi:10.1521/soco.1995.13.4.417.Google Scholar
Molden, D. C., Plaks, J. E. & Dweck, C. S. (2006) “Meaningful” social inferences: Effects of implicit theories on inferential processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
42(6):738–52. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.11.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, A. R., Molden, D. C., Ham, J. & Vonk, R. (2011) The automatic and co-occurring activation of multiple social inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
47(1):37–49.Google Scholar
Target article
The inherence heuristic: An intuitive means of making sense of the world, and a potential precursor to psychological essentialism
Related commentaries (29)
A single cognitive heuristic process meets the complexity of domain-specific moral heuristics
Can the inherence heuristic explain vitalistic reasoning?
Do we need the inherence heuristic to explain the bias towards inherent explanations?
Does the inherence heuristic take us to psychological essentialism?
Generalizing a model beyond the inherence heuristic and applying it to beliefs about objective value
Inherence heuristic versus essentialism: Issues of antecedence and cognitive mechanism
Inherence is an aspect of psychological essentialism
Inherence-based views of social categories
Is it about “pink” or about “girls”? The inherence heuristic across social and nonsocial domains
Is psychological essentialism an inherent feature of human cognition?
Is the inherence heuristic needed to understand system-justifying tendencies among children?
Is the inherence heuristic simply WEIRD?
Not so fast, and not so easy: Essentialism doesn't emerge from a simple heuristic
Owning up to the role of historical information
Quiddity and haecceity as distinct forms of essentialism
System-justifying motives can lead to both the acceptance and the rejection of innate explanations for group differences
Systematic revisions to inherent notions may shape improvements in cognitive infrastructure
The causes of characteristic properties: Insides versus categories
The developmental and evolutionary origins of psychological essentialism lie in sortal object individuation
The essence of essentialism?
The inherence heuristic is inherent in humans
The inherence heuristic: A basis for psychological essentialism?
The inherence heuristic: A key theoretical addition to understanding social stereotyping and prejudice
The inherent bias in positing an inherence heuristic
The psychology of inherence is self-referential (and that is a good thing)
The representation of inherent properties
The social aetiology of essentialist beliefs
Why does the “mental shotgun” fire system-justifying bullets?
Why we assume it's all good: The role of theory of mind in early inherent feature inferences
Author response
Refining and expanding the proposal of an inherence heuristic in human understanding