Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T09:21:22.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inherence-based views of social categories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2014

Marjorie Rhodes
Marjorie Rhodes*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003. marjorie.rhodes@nyu.eduhttp://www.psych.nyu.edu/rhodes/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Children adopt an inherence-based view of some social categories, viewing certain social categories as reflecting the inherent features of their members. Thinking of social categories in these terms contributes to prejudice and intergroup conflict. Thus, understanding what leads children to apply inherence-based views to particular categories could provide new direction for efforts to reduce these negative social phenomena.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 37 , Issue 5 , October 2014 , pp. 501 - 502
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allport, G. W. (1954) The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Diesendruck, G., Goldfein-Elbaz, R., Rhodes, M., Gelman, S. A. & Neumark, N. (2013) Cross-cultural differences in children's beliefs about the objectivity of social categories. Child Development 84:1906–17.Google Scholar
Diesendruck, G. & HaLevi, H. (2006) The role of language, appearance, and culture in children's social category-based induction. Child Development 77:539–53.Google Scholar
Dunham, Y., Baron, A. S. & Carey, S. (2011) Consequences of “minimal” group affiliations in children. Child Development 82:793–811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelman, S. A., Collman, P. & Maccoby, E. (1986) Inferring properties from categories versus inferring categories from properties: The case of gender. Child Development 57:396–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinzler, K., Shutts, K. & Correll, J. (2010) Priorities in social categories. European Journal of Social Psychology 40:581–92.Google Scholar
Rhodes, M. (2012) Naïve theories of social groups. Child Development 83:1900–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhodes, M. (2014) Children's explanations as a window into their intuitive theories of the social world. Cognitive Science. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12129. [Epub ahead of print]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhodes, M. & Chalik, L. (2013) Social categories as markers of intrinsic interpersonal obligations. Psychological Science 6:999–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, M. & Gelman, S. A. (2009) A developmental examination of the conceptual structure of animal, artifact, and human social categories across two cultural contexts. Cognitive Psychology 59:244–74.Google Scholar
Rhodes, M. & Leslie, S. J. (in preparation) Essentialism underlies the development of prejudiced attitudes.Google Scholar
Rhodes, M., Leslie, S. J. & Tworek, C. M. (2012) Cultural transmission of social essentialism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 109:13526–31.Google Scholar
Taylor, M., Rhodes, M. & Gelman, S. (2009) Boys will be boys; cows will be cows: Children's essentialist reasoning about gender categories and animal species. Child Development 80:461–81.Google Scholar
Waxman, S. (2010) Names will never hurt me? Naming and the development of racial and gender categories in preschool-aged children. European Journal of Social Psychology 40:593–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar