Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:16:38.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

If quantum probability = classical probability + bounded cognition; is this good, bad, or unnecessary?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2013

Tim Rakow
Tim Rakow*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester CO4 3SQ, United Kingdom. timrakow@essex.ac.ukhttp://www.essex.ac.uk/psychology/department/people/rakow.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Quantum probability models may supersede existing probabilistic models because they account for behaviour inconsistent with classical probability theory that are attributable to normal limitations of cognition. This intriguing position, however, may overstate weaknesses in classical probability theory by underestimating the role of current knowledge states and may under-employ available knowledge about the limitations of cognitive processes. In addition, flexibility in model specification has risks for the use of quantum probability.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , June 2013 , pp. 304 - 305
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Birnbaum, M. H. (2008) New paradoxes of risky decision making. Psychological Review 115:463–501.Google Scholar
Bush, R. R. & Mostellar, F. (1955) Stochastic models for learning. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Glöckner, A. & Betsch, T. (2011) The empirical content of theories in judgment and decision making: Shortcomings and remedies. Judgment and Decision Making 6:711–21.Google Scholar
Tversky, A. (1972) Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psychological Review 79:281–99.Google Scholar