Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:08:57.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The implicit possibility of dualism in quantum probabilistic cognitive modeling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2013

Donald Mender
Donald Mender*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511. donald.mender@yale.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pothos & Busemeyer (P&B) argue convincingly that quantum probability offers an improvement over classical Bayesian probability in modeling the empirical data of cognitive science. However, a weakness related to restrictions on the dimensionality of incompatible physical observables flows from the authors' “agnosticism” regarding quantum processes in neural substrates underlying cognition. Addressing this problem will require either future research findings validating quantum neurophysics or theoretical expansion of the uncertainty principle as a new, neurocognitively contextualized, “local” symmetry.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , June 2013 , pp. 298 - 299
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chalmers, D. (1995) Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2:200–19.Google Scholar
Engel, G. S., Calhoun, T. R., Read, E. L., Ahn, T. K., Mancal, T., Cheng, Y. C., Blankenship, R. E. & Fleming, G. R. (2007) Evidence for wavelike energy transfer through quantum coherence in photosynthetic systems. Nature (London) 446(7137):782–86.Google Scholar
Hagan, S., Hameroff, S. & Tuszynski, J. (2002) Quantum computation in brain microtubules? Decoherence and biological feasibility. Physical Review E 65:061901.Google Scholar
Tegmark, M. (2000) The importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes. Physical Review E 61:4194–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed