Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T08:47:07.435Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The importance of environmental threats and ideology in explaining extreme self-sacrifice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abdo Elnakouri ,
Ian McGregor  and
Igor Grossmann
Abdo Elnakouri
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo ON N2L 3G1, Canada. abdo.elnakouri@uwaterloo.caian.mcgregor@uwaterloo.caigor.grossmann@uwaterloo.cahttps://uwaterloo.ca/psychology/about/people/aelnakouhttps://uwaterloo.ca/psychology/people-profiles/ian-mcgregorhttps://uwaterloo.ca/psychology/people-profiles/igor-grossmann
Ian McGregor
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo ON N2L 3G1, Canada. abdo.elnakouri@uwaterloo.caian.mcgregor@uwaterloo.caigor.grossmann@uwaterloo.cahttps://uwaterloo.ca/psychology/about/people/aelnakouhttps://uwaterloo.ca/psychology/people-profiles/ian-mcgregorhttps://uwaterloo.ca/psychology/people-profiles/igor-grossmann
Igor Grossmann
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo ON N2L 3G1, Canada. abdo.elnakouri@uwaterloo.caian.mcgregor@uwaterloo.caigor.grossmann@uwaterloo.cahttps://uwaterloo.ca/psychology/about/people/aelnakouhttps://uwaterloo.ca/psychology/people-profiles/ian-mcgregorhttps://uwaterloo.ca/psychology/people-profiles/igor-grossmann
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We argue that Whitehouse's group-based model neglects two key contextual variables: environmental threats and ideology. Environmental threats lead to extremism outside of group settings and predispose individuals toward joining ideologically zealous groups. Ideologies and environmental threats can also explain why certain groups adopt norms that encourage violent self-sacrifice.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 41 , 2018 , e201
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appleby, S. R. (1999) The ambivalence of the sacred: Religion, violence, and reconciliation. Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Biggs, M. (2005) Dying without killing: Self-immolations, 1963–2002. In: Making sense of suicide missions, ed. Gambetta, D., pp. 173–208. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bushman, B. J., Ridge, R. D., Das, E., Key, C. W. & Busath, G. L. (2007) When God sanctions killing: Effect of scriptural violence on aggression. Psychological Science 18(3):204–207.Google Scholar
Cinnirella, M., Lewis, C., Ansari, H., Loewenthal, K., Brooke-Rogers, M. & Amlot, R. (2010) Social identity and beliefs about martyrdom and terrorism amongst British Muslims. The Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Dawson, L. L. (2018) Challenging the curious erasure of religion from the study of religious terrorism. Numen 65(2–3):141–64.Google Scholar
Dawson, L. L. & Amarasingam, A. (2017) Talking to foreign fighters: Insights into the motivations for Hijrah to Syria and Iraq. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 40(3):191–210.Google Scholar
Fritsche, I., Jonas, E., Ablasser, C., Beyer, M., Kuban, J., Manger, A.-M. & Schultz, M. (2013) The power of we: Evidence for group-based control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49(1):19–32.Google Scholar
Gelfand, M. J., Harrington, J. R. & Jackson, J. C. (2017) The strength of social norms across human groups. Perspectives on Psychological Science 12(5):800–809.Google Scholar
Ginges, J., Hansen, I. G. & Norenzayan, A. (2009) Religion and support for suicide attacks. Psychological Science 20(2):224–30.Google Scholar
Gómez, A., López-Rodríguez, L., Sheikh, H., Ginges, J., Wilson, L., Waziri, H., Vázquez, A., Davis, R. & Atran, S. (2017) The devoted actor's will to fight and the spiritual dimension of human conflict. Nature Human Behaviour 1(9):673–79. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0193-3.Google Scholar
Hogg, M. A., Sherman, D. K., Dierselhuis, J., Maitner, A. T. & Moffitt, G. (2007) Uncertainty, entitativity, and group identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43(1):135–42.Google Scholar
Jonas, E., McGregor, I., Klackl, J., Agroskin, D., Fritsche, I., Holbrook, C. & Quirin, M. (2014) Threat and defense: From anxiety to approach. In: Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, ed. Olson, J. M. & Zanna, M. P., vol. 49, pp. 219–86. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kruglanski, A., Jasko, K., Webber, D., Chernikova, M. & Molinario, E. (2018) The making of violent extremists. Review of General Psychology 22(1):107–20.Google Scholar
McGregor, I. (2003) Defensive zeal: Compensatory conviction about attitudes, values, goals, groups, and self-definitions in the face of personal uncertainty. In: Motivated social perception: The Ontario symposium, ed. Spencer, S. J., Fein, S., Zanna, M. P. & Olson, J. M., vol. 9, pp. 73–92. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
McGregor, I., Hayes, J. & Prentice, M. (2015) Motivation for aggressive religious radicalization: Goal regulation theory and a personality×threat×affordance hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology 6(1325):1–18.Google Scholar
McGregor, I., Nash, K. & Prentice, M. (2010) Reactive approach motivation (RAM) for religion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 99(1):148–61.Google Scholar
Norenzayan, A. (2016) Theodiversity. Annual Review of Psychology 67:465–88.Google Scholar
Norenzayan, A., Shariff, A. F., Gervais, W. M., Willard, A. K., McNamara, R. A., Slingerland, E. & Henrich, J. (2016) The cultural evolution of prosocial religions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39:e1.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. & Campbell, D. E. (2012) American grace: How religion divides and unites us. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Pyszczynski, T., Abdollahi, A., Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., Cohen, F. & Weise, D. (2006) Mortality salience, martyrdom, and military might: The great Satan versus the axis of evil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32(4):525–37.Google Scholar
Rink, A. & Sharma, K. (2018) The determinants of religious radicalization: Evidence from Kenya. Journal of Conflict Resolution 62(6):1229–61.Google Scholar
Rothschild, Z. K., Abdollahi, A. & Pyszczynski, T. (2009) Does peace have a prayer? The effect of mortality salience, compassionate values, and religious fundamentalism on hostility toward out-groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45(4):816–27.Google Scholar
Schumann, K., McGregor, I., Nash, K. A. & Ross, M. (2014) Religious magnanimity: Reminding people of their religious belief system reduces hostility after threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 107(3):432–53.Google Scholar
Somasundaram, O., Tejus Murthy, A. G. & Raghavan, D. V. (2016) Jainism – Its relevance to psychiatric practice; with special reference to the practice of Sallekhana. Indian Journal of Psychiatry 58(4):471–74.Google Scholar
Stack, S. (1987) Celebrities and suicide: A taxonomy and analysis, 1948–1983. American Sociological Review 52(3):401–12.Google Scholar
Thornhill, R. & Fincher, C. L. (2014) The parasite-stress theory of sociality, the behavioral immune system, and human social and cognitive uniqueness. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences 8(4):257–64.Google Scholar
Vail, K. E., Rothschild, Z. K., Weise, D. R., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T. & Greenberg, J. (2010) A terror management analysis of the psychological functions of religion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1):84–94.Google Scholar
Varnum, M. E. W. & Grossmann, I. (2016) Pathogen prevalence is associated with cultural changes in gender equality. Nature Human Behaviour 1:Article 0003.Google Scholar
Varnum, M. E. W & Grossmann, I. (2017) Cultural change: The how and the why. Perspectives on Psychological Science 12(6):956–72.Google Scholar
Wood, G. (2016) The way of the strangers: Encounters with the Islamic State. Random House.Google Scholar