Article contents
The analytic utility of distinguishing fighting from dying
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 December 2018
Abstract
Fighting and dying, or what Whitehouse calls “out-group hostility” and “extreme self-sacrifice,” are not conceptually overlapping, but in fact are highly distinguishable, both theoretically and empirically. I present empirical evidence from a reanalysis of Ginges et al. (2009, Study 4), demonstrating the potentially inverse relationship between “parochial hostility” – fighting and “sacrificial altruism” – “and” dying.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018
References
A correction has been issued for this article:
- 1
- Cited by
Linked content
Please note a has been issued for this article.
Target article
Dying for the group: Towards a general theory of extreme self-sacrifice
Related commentaries (29)
A potential explanation for self-radicalisation
Accumulative fusion and the issue of age: Reconciling the model with the data
Altruism, collective rationality, and extreme self-sacrifice
Communal sharing/identity fusion does not require reflection on episodic memory of shared experience or trauma – and usually generates kindness
Considering selection pressures for identity fusion and self-sacrifice in small-scale societies
Does identity fusion give rise to the group – or the reverse? Politics- versus community-based groups
Dying for your group or for your faith? On the power of belief
Extreme self-sacrifice beyond fusion: Moral expansiveness and the special case of allyship
Identity fusion and fitness interdependence
Identity fusion “in the wild”: Moving toward or away from a general theory of identity fusion?
Individual difference in acts of self-sacrifice
Individuals, traditions, and the righteous
Motivational (con)fusion: Identity fusion does not quell personal self-interest
Origins of social fusion
Segregation and belief polarization as boundary conditions for when fusion leads to self-sacrifice
Self-sacrifice as a social signal
Self-sacrifice for a cause: The role of ideas and beliefs in motivating human conflict
Self-sacrifice for in-group's history: A diachronic perspective
Strength in numbers: A survival strategy that helps explain social bonding and commitment
The analytic utility of distinguishing fighting from dying
The fire burns within: Individual motivations for self-sacrifice
The importance of environmental threats and ideology in explaining extreme self-sacrifice
The motivation to sacrifice for a cause reflects a basic cognitive bias
The power of norms to sway fused group members
The role of entitativity in perpetuating cycles of violence
Toward a more comprehensive theory of self-sacrificial violence
What fuses sports fans?
What motivates devoted actors to extreme sacrifice, identity fusion, or sacred values?
“Self-sacrifice” as an accidental outcome of extreme within-group mutualism
Author response
Four things we need to know about extreme self-sacrifice