No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Origins of social fusion
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 December 2018
Abstract
Do instances of extreme self-sacrifice represent a valid paradigm to capture what makes typical individuals fuse with others? Probably not, because they can be viewed as aberrant phenomena. To understand the origins and mechanisms of human social fusion, one should first look at the development of babies and young children. Typical development represents the best alternative to Whitehouse's extreme model of social fusion.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018
References
Aboud, F. E. (2003) The formation of in-group favoritism and out-group prejudice in young children: Are they distinct attitudes? Developmental Psychology 39(1):48–60.Google Scholar
Bigelow, A. & Rochat, P. (2006) Two-month-old infants' sensitivity to social contingency in mother–infant and stranger–infant interaction. Infancy 9(3):313–25.Google Scholar
Cordonier, L., Nettles, T. & Rochat, P. (2017) Strong and strategic conformity by 3- and 5 year-old children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 36(3):438–51.Google Scholar
Gelman, S. (2003) The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haun, D. & Tomasello, M. (2011) Conformity to peer pressure in preschool children. Child Development 82(6):1759–67.Google Scholar
Kinzler, K. D., Dupoux, E. & Spelke, E. S. (2007) The native language of social cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104(30):12577–80.Google Scholar
Nesdale, D. (2008) Peer group rejection and children's intergroup prejudice. In: Inter-group attitudes and relations in childhood through adulthood, ed. Levy, S. R. & Killen, M., pp. 32–46. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nesdale, D., Durkin, K., Maass, A. & Griffiths, J. (2005) Threat, group identification, and children's ethnic prejudice. Social Development 14:189–205.Google Scholar
Rochat, P. (2014/2015) Origins of possession: Owning and sharing in development. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rochat, P. (2018) The ontogeny of human self-consciousness. Current Directions in Psychological Science. Available online September 17, 2018 at https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418760236.Google Scholar
Shutts, K. (2015) Young children's preferences: Gender, race, and social status. Child Development Perspectives 9(4):262–66.Google Scholar
Shutts, K., Brey, E. L., Dornbusch, L. A., Slywotzky, N., Olson, K. R. & Pavlova, M. A. (2016) Children use wealth cues to evaluate others. PLOS ONE 11(3):e0149360.Google Scholar
Target article
Dying for the group: Towards a general theory of extreme self-sacrifice
Related commentaries (29)
A potential explanation for self-radicalisation
Accumulative fusion and the issue of age: Reconciling the model with the data
Altruism, collective rationality, and extreme self-sacrifice
Communal sharing/identity fusion does not require reflection on episodic memory of shared experience or trauma – and usually generates kindness
Considering selection pressures for identity fusion and self-sacrifice in small-scale societies
Does identity fusion give rise to the group – or the reverse? Politics- versus community-based groups
Dying for your group or for your faith? On the power of belief
Extreme self-sacrifice beyond fusion: Moral expansiveness and the special case of allyship
Identity fusion and fitness interdependence
Identity fusion “in the wild”: Moving toward or away from a general theory of identity fusion?
Individual difference in acts of self-sacrifice
Individuals, traditions, and the righteous
Motivational (con)fusion: Identity fusion does not quell personal self-interest
Origins of social fusion
Segregation and belief polarization as boundary conditions for when fusion leads to self-sacrifice
Self-sacrifice as a social signal
Self-sacrifice for a cause: The role of ideas and beliefs in motivating human conflict
Self-sacrifice for in-group's history: A diachronic perspective
Strength in numbers: A survival strategy that helps explain social bonding and commitment
The analytic utility of distinguishing fighting from dying
The fire burns within: Individual motivations for self-sacrifice
The importance of environmental threats and ideology in explaining extreme self-sacrifice
The motivation to sacrifice for a cause reflects a basic cognitive bias
The power of norms to sway fused group members
The role of entitativity in perpetuating cycles of violence
Toward a more comprehensive theory of self-sacrificial violence
What fuses sports fans?
What motivates devoted actors to extreme sacrifice, identity fusion, or sacred values?
“Self-sacrifice” as an accidental outcome of extreme within-group mutualism
Author response
Four things we need to know about extreme self-sacrifice