No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Emotions in attacker-defender conflicts
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 August 2019
Abstract
The distinction between attackers and defenders might help refine the understanding of the role of emotions in conflicts. Here, we briefly discuss differences between attackers and defenders in terms of appraisals, action tendencies, emotional preferences, and brain activities. Finally, we outline how attackers and defenders may differ in their response to emotion-based interventions that aim to promote conflict resolution.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019
References
Arnsten, A. F. T. (2009) Stress signalling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 10(6):410–22. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2648.Google Scholar
Bar-Tal, D. (2013) Intractable conflicts: Socio-psychological foundations and dynamics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bar-Tal, D., Halperin, E. & De Rivera, J. (2007) Collective emotions in conflict situations: Societal implications. Journal of Social Issues 63(2):441–60. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00518.x.Google Scholar
Cernadas Curotto, P., Sander, D., Halperin, E. & Klimecki, O. (in preparation) The impact of compassion and emotion regulation training on conflict resolution.Google Scholar
Davidson, R. J., Putnam, K. M. & Larson, C. L. (2000) Dysfunction in the neural circuitry of emotion regulation – A possible prelude to violence. Science 289(5479):591–94. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5479.591.Google Scholar
Fontaine, J. R. J., Scherer, K. R., Roesch, E. B. & Ellsworth, P. C. (2007) The world of emotions is not two-dimensional. Psychological Science 18(12):1050–1057. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02024.x.Google Scholar
Giancola, P. R. (1995) Evidence for dorsolateral and orbital prefrontal cortical involvement in the expression of aggressive behavior. Aggressive Behavior 21(6):431–50. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2337(1995)21:6<431::AID-AB2480210604>3.0.CO;2-Q.3.0.CO;2-Q.>Google Scholar
Goetz, J., Keltner, D. & Simon-Thomas, E. (2010) Compassion: An evolutionary analysis and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin 136(3):351–74. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018807.Google Scholar
Gross, J. J. (1998) The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology 2(3):271–99. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271.Google Scholar
Gross, J. J. (2001) Emotion regulation in adulthood: Timing is everything. Current Directions in Psychological Science 10(6):214–19. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00152.Google Scholar
Halperin, E. (2014) Emotion, emotion regulation, and conflict resolution. Emotion Review, 6(1):68–76. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073913491844.Google Scholar
Halperin, E. (2016) Emotions in conflict: Inhibitors and facilitators of peace making. Routledge.Google Scholar
Halperin, E., Porat, R., Tamir, M. & Gross, J. J. (2013) Can emotion regulation change political attitudes in intractable conflicts? From the laboratory to the field. Psychological Science 24(1):106–11. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/095679761245257.Google Scholar
Halperin, E., Russell, A. G., Trzesniewski, K. H., Gross, J. J. & Dweck, C. S. (2011) Promoting the middle east peace process by changing beliefs about group malleability. Science 333(6050):1767–69. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1202925.Google Scholar
Klimecki, O. M., Sander, D. & Vuilleumier, P. (2018) Distinct brain areas involved in anger versus punishment during social interactions. Scientific Reports 8:10556. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28863-3.Google Scholar
Lerner, J. S. & Keltner, D. (2000) Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice. Cognition and Emotion 14(4):473–93. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/026999300402763.Google Scholar
Lerner, J. S. & Keltner, D. (2001) Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81(1):146–59. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.146.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. J. & Trainor, B. C. (2007) Neural mechanisms of aggression. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8:536–46. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2174.Google Scholar
Porat, R., Halperin, E. & Tamir, M. (2016) What we want is what we get: Group-based emotional preferences and conflict resolution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 110(2):167–90. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000043.Google Scholar
Raine, A. & Yang, Y. (2006) Neural foundations to moral reasoning and antisocial behavior. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 1(3):203–13. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsl033.Google Scholar
Sander, D., Grandjean, D. & Scherer, K. R. (2018) An appraisal-driven componential approach to the emotional brain. Emotion Review 10(3):219–31. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073918765653.Google Scholar
Scherer, K. R. & Moors, A. (2019) The emotion process: Event appraisal and component differentiation. Annual Review of Psychology 70(1):719–45. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011854.Google Scholar
Tamir, M. (2009) What do people want to feel and why? Pleasure and utility in emotion regulation. Current Directions in Psychological Science 18(2):101–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01617.xGoogle Scholar
Tamir, M. (2016) Why do people regulate their emotions? A taxonomy of motives in emotion regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Review 20(3):199–222. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868315586325.Google Scholar
Target article
Revisiting the form and function of conflict: Neurobiological, psychological, and cultural mechanisms for attack and defense within and between groups
Related commentaries (28)
A note on the endogeneity of attacker and defender roles in asymmetric conflicts
Advantaged- and disadvantaged-group members have motivations similar to those of defenders and attackers, but their psychological characteristics are fundamentally different
Attack versus defense: A strategic rationale for role differentiation in conflict
Behavioural inhibition and valuation of gain/loss are neurally distinct from approach/withdrawal
Between-group attack and defence in an ecological setting: Insights from nonhuman animals
But how does it develop? Adopting a sociocultural lens to the development of intergroup bias among children
Collective action problems in offensive and defensive warfare
Do people always invest less in attack than defense? Possible qualifying factors
Emotions in attacker-defender conflicts
Functional sex differences and signal forms have coevolved with conflict
Identity leadership: Managing perceptions of conflict for collective action
Levels of analysis and problems of evidential support in the study of asymmetric conflict
Matching pennies games as asymmetric models of conflict
Moral rigidity as a proximate facilitator of group cohesion and combativeness
Reasons to strike first
Resolving attacker-defender conflicts through intergroup negotiation
Symmetric conflicts also allow for the investigation of attack and defense
The attack and defense games
The attack and defense mechanisms: Perspectives from behavioral economics and game theory
The evolutionarily mismatched nature of modern group makeup and the proposed application of such knowledge on promoting unity among members during times of intergroup conflict
The importance of raiding ecology and sex differences in offensive and defensive warfare
The multiple facets of psychopathy in attack and defense conflicts
The political complexity of attack and defense
Toward the need to discriminate types of attackers and defenders in intergroup conflicts
Towards the elucidation of evolution of out-group aggression
Unraveling the role of oxytocin in the motivational structure of conflict
Using political sanctions to discourage intergroup attacks: Social identity and authority legitimacy
Using the research on intergroup conflict in nonhuman animals to help inform patterns of human intergroup conflict
Author response
Asymmetric conflict: Structures, strategies, and settlement