No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Using the research on intergroup conflict in nonhuman animals to help inform patterns of human intergroup conflict
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 August 2019
Abstract
There is a large body of research on conflict in nonhuman animal groups that measures the costs and benefits of intergroup conflict, and we suggest that much of this evidence is missing from De Dreu and Gross's interesting article. It is a shame this work has been missed, because it provides evidence for interesting ideas put forward in the article.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019
References
Bonanni, R., Valsecchi, P. & Natoli, E. (2010) Pattern of individual participation and cheating in conflicts between groups of free-ranging dogs. Animal Behaviour 79:957–68.Google Scholar
Cant, M. A., Otali, E. & Mwanguhya, F. (2002) Fighting and mating between groups in a cooperatively breeding mammal, the banded mongoose. Ethology 108:541–55.Google Scholar
Christensen, C. & Radford, A. N. (2018) Dear enemies or nasty neighbours? Causes and consequences of variation in the responses of group-living species to territorial intrusions. Behavioral Ecology 29:1004–13.Google Scholar
Majolo, B., de Bortoli Vizoli, A. & Lehmann, J. (2016) The effect of intergroup competition on intragroup affiliation in primates. Animal Behaviour 114:13–19.Google Scholar
Mirville, M. O. (2018) The causes and consequences of intergroup interactions in mountain gorillas (Gorilla beringei beringei). PhD thesis, University of Western Australia.Google Scholar
Mirville, M. O., Ridley, A. R., Samedi, J. P. M., Vecellio, V., Ndagijimana, F., Stoinski, T. S. & Grueter, C. C. (2018) Factors influencing individual participation during intergroup interactions in mountain gorillas. Animal Behaviour 144:75–86.Google Scholar
Nunn, C.L. (2000) Collective benefits, free-riders and male extra-group conflict. In: Primate males, ed Kappeler, P. M., pp. 192–204, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Radford, A. N. (2008) Duration and outcome of intergroup conflict influences intragroup affiliative behavior. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 275:2787–91.Google Scholar
Ridley, A. R. (2016) Southern pied babblers: the dynamics of conflict and cooperation in a group-living society. In: Cooperative breeding in vertebrates: studies in ecology, evolution and behaviour, ed. Koenig, W. D. & Dickinson, J. L., pp. 115–32. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schindler, S. & Radford, A. N. (2018) Factors influencing within-group conflict over defence against conspecific outsiders seeking breeding positions. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 285:20181669.Google Scholar
Thompson, F. J., Marshall, H. H., Vitikainen, E. I. K. & Cant, M. A. (2017) Causes and consequencs of intergroup conflict in cooperative banded mongooses. Animal Behaviour 126:31–40.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. L. (2001) Imbalances of power: How chimpanzees respond to the threat of intergroup aggression. PhD thesis, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Wilson, M.L. & Wrangham, R.W. (2003) Intergroup relations in chimpanzees. Annual Review of Anthropology 32:363–92.Google Scholar
Wrangham, R. W. (1999) Evolution of coalitionary killing. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 42:1–30.Google Scholar
Wrangham, R. W. & Glowacki, L. (2012) Intergroup aggression in chimpanzees and war in nomadic hunter-gatherers: Evaluating the chimpanzee model. Human Nature 23:5–29. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-012-9132-1.Google Scholar
Target article
Revisiting the form and function of conflict: Neurobiological, psychological, and cultural mechanisms for attack and defense within and between groups
Related commentaries (28)
A note on the endogeneity of attacker and defender roles in asymmetric conflicts
Advantaged- and disadvantaged-group members have motivations similar to those of defenders and attackers, but their psychological characteristics are fundamentally different
Attack versus defense: A strategic rationale for role differentiation in conflict
Behavioural inhibition and valuation of gain/loss are neurally distinct from approach/withdrawal
Between-group attack and defence in an ecological setting: Insights from nonhuman animals
But how does it develop? Adopting a sociocultural lens to the development of intergroup bias among children
Collective action problems in offensive and defensive warfare
Do people always invest less in attack than defense? Possible qualifying factors
Emotions in attacker-defender conflicts
Functional sex differences and signal forms have coevolved with conflict
Identity leadership: Managing perceptions of conflict for collective action
Levels of analysis and problems of evidential support in the study of asymmetric conflict
Matching pennies games as asymmetric models of conflict
Moral rigidity as a proximate facilitator of group cohesion and combativeness
Reasons to strike first
Resolving attacker-defender conflicts through intergroup negotiation
Symmetric conflicts also allow for the investigation of attack and defense
The attack and defense games
The attack and defense mechanisms: Perspectives from behavioral economics and game theory
The evolutionarily mismatched nature of modern group makeup and the proposed application of such knowledge on promoting unity among members during times of intergroup conflict
The importance of raiding ecology and sex differences in offensive and defensive warfare
The multiple facets of psychopathy in attack and defense conflicts
The political complexity of attack and defense
Toward the need to discriminate types of attackers and defenders in intergroup conflicts
Towards the elucidation of evolution of out-group aggression
Unraveling the role of oxytocin in the motivational structure of conflict
Using political sanctions to discourage intergroup attacks: Social identity and authority legitimacy
Using the research on intergroup conflict in nonhuman animals to help inform patterns of human intergroup conflict
Author response
Asymmetric conflict: Structures, strategies, and settlement