Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T13:42:49.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two challenges for a dual system approach to temporal cognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2019

Felipe De Brigard Open the ORCID record for Felipe De Brigard [Opens in a new window]  and
Kevin O'Neill
Felipe De Brigard
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Duke University, Durham, NC27708. felipe.debrigard@duke.edu Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC27708 Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC27708. kevin.oneill@duke.edu Duke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC27708. www.imclab.org
Kevin O'Neill
Affiliation:
Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC27708. kevin.oneill@duke.edu Duke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC27708. www.imclab.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hoerl & McCormack (H&M) propose a two-system account of temporal cognition. We suggest that, following other classic proposals where cognitive systems are putatively independent, H&M's two-system hypothesis should, at a minimum, involve (1) a difference in the nature of the representations upon which each system operates, and (2) a difference in the computations they carry out. In this comment we offer two challenges aimed at showing that H&M's proposal does not meet the minimal requirements (1) and (2).

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 42 , 2019 , e247
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, R. C. & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968) Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In: The psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 2, ed. Spence, K. W. & Spence, J. T., pp. 89–195. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. & Boroditsky, L. (2008) Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition 106(2):579–93. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clayton, N. S. & Dickinson, A. (1998) Episodic-like memory during cache recovery by scrub jays. Nature 395(6699):272–74. doi:10.1038/26216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Brigard, F. (2017) Cognitive systems and the changing brain. Philosophical Explorations 20(2):224–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolman, E. C. & Honzik, C. H. (1930) Introduction and removal of reward, and maze performance in rats. University of California Publications in Psychology 4:257–75.Google Scholar