Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T04:58:26.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Time, flow, and space

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2019

Craig Callender
Craig Callender*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA92093. ccallender@ucsd.eduwww.craigcallender.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Does a temporal dual process theory explain the illusive flow of time? I point out one shortcoming of such a theory and propose an alternative that does not require either dual cognitive processes or demand such a stark asymmetry between space and time in the brain.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 42 , 2019 , e246
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, A. (2013) Decoding Space and Time in the Brain, Scientific American MIND. Available at https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/mind-guest-blog/decoding-space-and-time-in-the-brain/.Google Scholar
Callender, C. (2017) What makes time special? Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198797302.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McTaggart, J. E. (1908) The unreality of time. Mind 17(4):457–74. doi:10.1093/mind/XVII.4.457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, H. (2011) The flow of time. In: The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time, ed. Callender, C., pp. 276–311. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199298204.003.0010.Google Scholar
Sloman, S. A. (1996) The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 119(1):3–22. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1983) Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review 90(4):293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velleman, D. (2006) So it goes. The Amherst lecture in philosophy. http://www.amherstlecture.org/velleman2006/.Google Scholar