No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Closing the symbolic reference gap to support flexible reasoning about the passage of time
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 December 2019
Abstract
This commentary relates Hoerl & McCormack's dual systems perspective to models of cognitive development emphasizing representational redescription and the role of culturally constructed tools, including language, in providing flexible formats for thinking. We describe developmental processes that enable children to construct a mental time line, situate themselves in time, and overcome the primacy of the here and now.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019
References
Ames, L. B. (1946) The development of the sense of time in the young child. The Pedagogical Seminary and Journal of Genetic Psychology 68(1):97–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burny, E., Valcke, M. & Desoete, A. (2009) Towards an agenda for studying learning and instruction focusing on time-related competences in children. Educational Studies 35(5):481–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casasanto, D. & Boroditsky, L. (2008) Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition 106(2):579–93. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003) Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Harner, L. (1975) Yesterday and tomorrow: Development of early understanding of the terms. Developmental Psychology 11:864–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, J. (2002) “Do you know what we're going to do this summer?” Mothers’ talk to preschool children about future events. Journal of Cognition and Development 3(1):49–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, J. A. (2006) The development of future time concepts through mother-child conversation. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 52(1):70–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1979) Micro- and macrodevelopmental changes in language acquisition and other representational systems. Cognitive Science 3:91–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992) Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levy, E. & Nelson, K. (1994) Words in discourse: A dialectical approach to the acquisition of meaning and use. Journal of Child Language 21:367–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandler, J. M. (2004) The foundations of mind: Origins of conceptual thought. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1991) The matter of time: Interdependencies between language and thought in development. In: Perspectives on language and cognition: Interrelations in development, ed. Gelman, S. A. & Byrnes, J. P., pp. 278–318. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. (1996) Language in cognitive development: The emergence of the mediated mind. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. & Fivush, R. (2004) The emergence of autobiographical memory: A social cultural developmental theory. Psychological Review 111(2):486–511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, K. & Gruendel, J. (1981) Generalized event representations: Basic building blocks of cognitive development. In: Advances in developmental psychology, ed. Lamb, M. E. & Brown, A. L., pp. 131–58. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Nelson, K., Skwerer, D. P., Goldman, S., Henseler, S., Presler, N. & Walkenfeld, F. F. (2003) Entering a community of minds: An experiential approach to “theory of mind.” Human Development 46(1):24–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Núñez, R. E. (2011) No innate number line in the human brain. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 42(4):651–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Núñez, R. E. (2017) Is there really an evolved capacity for number? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 21(6):409–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Núñez, R. & Cooperrider, K. (2013) The tangle of space and time in human cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17(5):220–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plunkett, K., Hu, J. F. & Cohen, L. B. (2008) Labels can override perceptual categories in early infancy. Cognition 106(2):665–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tamariz, M. & Kirby, S. (2016) The cultural evolution of language. Current Opinion in Psychology 8:37–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tenbrink, T. (2007) Space, time, and the use of language: An investigation of relationships. de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1999) The cultural origins of human cognition. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, L. (2001) Aspectual influences on early tense comprehension. Journal of Child Language 28(3):661–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waxman, S. R. & Markow, D. B. (1995) Words as invitations to form categories: Evidence from 12-to 13-month-old infants. Cognitive Psychology 29(3):257–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weist, R. M. (1989) Time concepts in language and thought: Filling the Piagetian void between two and five years. In: Time and human cognition: A life-span perspective. Advances in psychology, vol. 59, ed. Levin, T. & Zakay, D., pp. 63–118. Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Target article
Thinking in and about time: A dual systems perspective on temporal cognition
Related commentaries (33)
A dual-systems perspective on temporal cognition: Implications for the role of emotion
A theory stuck in evolutionary and historical time
Animals are not cognitively stuck in time
Are counterfactuals in and about time?
Beings in the moment
Closing the symbolic reference gap to support flexible reasoning about the passage of time
Dual systems for all: Higher-order, role-based relational reasoning as a uniquely derived feature of human cognition
From temporal updating to temporal reasoning: Developments in young children's temporal representations
Future-oriented objects
Identity-based motivation and the paradox of the future self: Getting going requires thinking about time (later) in time (now)
Let's call a memory a memory, but what kind?
Limitations of Hoerl and McCormack's dual systems model of temporal consciousness
Locating animals with respect to landmarks in space-time
Locating the contradiction in our understanding of time
Neural correlates of temporal updating and reasoning in association with neuropsychiatric disorders
No doing without time
Nonhuman sequence learning findings argue against Hoerl and McCormack's two systems of temporal cognition
On believing that time does not flow, but thinking that it seems to
On the human uniqueness of the temporal reasoning system
Problems with the dual-systems approach to temporal cognition
Temporal representation and reasoning in non-human animals
Temporal updating, behavioral learning, and the phenomenology of time-consciousness
The dual systems in temporal cognition: A spatial analogy
The “now moment” is believed privileged because “now” is when happening is experienced
Thinking about the past as the past for the past's sake: Why did temporal reasoning evolve?
Thinking about thinking about time
Thinking about time and number: An application of the dual-systems approach to numerical cognition
Time, flow, and space
Timers from birth: Early timing abilities exceed limits of the temporal updating system
Two challenges for a dual system approach to temporal cognition
Updating and reasoning: Different processes, different models, different functions
Updating the dual systems model of temporal cognition: Reasoning with dynamic systems theory
What time words teach us about children's acquisition of the temporal reasoning system
Author response
Temporal updating, temporal reasoning, and the domain of time