Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:42:10.349Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Timers from birth: Early timing abilities exceed limits of the temporal updating system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2019

Karina Hamamouche Open the ORCID record for Karina Hamamouche [Opens in a new window]
Karina Hamamouche*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA02467. hamamouc@bc.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hoerl & McCormack argue that children are incapable of reasoning about time until age 5. However, their dual timing perspective does not address non-symbolic timing, or timing in the absence of symbols/language. Given substantial evidence that infants and children are capable of non-symbolic timing, I argue that infants and children are well-tuned timers prior to age 5.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 42 , 2019 , e253
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brannon, E. M., Libertus, M. E., Meck, W. H. & Woldorff, M. G. (2008) Electrophysiological measures of time processing in infant and adult brains: Weber's Law holds. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20(2):193–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brannon, E. M., Roussel, L. W., Meck, W. H. & Woldorff, M. (2004) Timing in the baby brain. Cognitive Brain Research 21(2):227–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brannon, E. M., Suanda, S. & Libertus, K. (2007) Temporal discrimination increases in precision over development and parallels the development of numerosity discrimination. Developmental Science 10(6):770–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Church, R. M. & Deluty, M. Z. (1977) Bisection of temporal intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 3(3):216.Google ScholarPubMed
Droit-Volet, S., Clement, A. & Wearden, J. (2001) Temporal generalization in 3-to 8-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 80(3):271–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Droit-Volet, S. & Wearden, J. H. (2001) Temporal bisection in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 80(2):142–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbon, J. (1977) Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's law in animal timing. Psychological Review 84(3):279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamamouche, K. & Cordes, S. (2019). Learning about time: Knowledge of formal timing symbols is related to individual differences in temporal precision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meck, W. H. & Church, R. M. (1983) A mode control model of counting and timing processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 9(3):320.Google ScholarPubMed
Odic, D. (2018) Children's intuitive sense of number develops independently of their perception of area, density, length, and time. Developmental Science 21(2):e12533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odic, D., Lisboa, J. V., Eisinger, R., Olivera, M. G., Maiche, A. & Halberda, J. (2016) Approximate number and approximate time discrimination each correlate with school math abilities in young children. Acta Psychologica 163:17–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Provasi, J., Rattat, A. C. & Droit-Volet, S. (2011) Temporal bisection in 4-month-old infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 37(1):108.Google ScholarPubMed
vanMarle, K. & Wynn, K. (2006) Six-month-old infants use analog magnitudes to represent duration. Developmental Science 9(5):F41–F49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed