Elliott, Rothenberg, and Stock (1996,
Econometrica 64, 813–836) derive a class of
point-optimal unit root tests in a time series model with Gaussian
errors. Other authors have proposed “robust” tests that are
not optimal for any model but perform well when the error distribution
has thick tails. I derive a class of point-optimal tests for models
with non-Gaussian errors. When the true error distribution is known and
has thick tails, the point-optimal tests are generally more powerful
than the tests of Elliott et al. (1996) and
also than the robust tests. However, when the true error distribution
is unknown and asymmetric, the point-optimal tests can behave very
badly. Thus there is a trade-off between robustness to unknown error
distributions and optimality with respect to the trend coefficients.This paper could not have been written without
the encouragement of Thomas Rothenberg. This is based on my dissertation,
which he supervised. I also thank Don Andrews, Jack Porter, Jim Stock, and
seminar participants at the University of Pennsylvania, the University of
Toronto, the University of Montreal, Princeton University, and the meetings
of the Econometric Society in UCLA. Comments of three anonymous referees
greatly improved the exposition of the paper. I owe special thanks to Gary
Chamberlain for helping me to understand these results.