No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Development of human spatial cognition in a three-dimensional world
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 October 2013
Abstract
Jeffery et al. accurately identify the importance of developing an understanding of spatial reference frames in a three-dimensional world. We examine human spatial cognition via a unique paradigm that investigates the role of saliency and adjusting reference frames. This includes work with adults, typically developing children, and children who develop non-typically (e.g., those with autism).
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013
References
Baron-Cohen, S. (2008) Autism, hypersystemizing, and truth. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
61(1):64–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dalrymple, K. A. & Kingstone, A. (2010) Time to act and attend to the real mechanisms of action and attention. British Journal of Psychology
101:213–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foulsham, T. & Kingstone, A. (2012) Goal-driven and bottom-up gaze in an active real-world search task. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye-Tracking Research and Applications (ETRA ’12), Santa Barbara, CA, March 28–30, 2012, ed. Morimoto, C. H., Istance, H. O., Mulligan, J. B., Qvarfordt, P. & Spencer, S. N., pp. 189–92. ACM Digital Library.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foulsham, T., Walker, E. & Kingstone, A. (2011) The where, what and when of gaze allocation in the lab and the natural environment. Vision Research
51(17):1920–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ingram, J. N. & Wolpert, D. M. (2011) Naturalistic approaches to sensorimotor control. Progress in Brain Research
191:3–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Longstaffe, K. A., Hood, B. M. & Gilchrist, I. D. (2012) Inhibition, attention and working memory in large scale search. Poster presented at the 5th International Conference on Spatial Cognition, “Space and Embodied Cognition,” Rome, Italy, September 4–8, 2012.Google Scholar
Pellicano, E., Smith, A. D., Cristino, F., Hood, B. M., Briscoe, J. & Gilchrist, I. D. (2011) Children with autism are neither systematic nor optimal foragers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA
108(1):421–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, A. D., Gilchrist, I. D. & Hood, B. M. (2005) Children's search behaviour in large-scale space: Developmental components of exploration. Perception
34(10):1221–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, A. D., Hood, B. M. & Gilchrist, I. D. (2008) Visual search and foraging compared in a large-scale search task. Cognitive Processing
9(2):121–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. D., Hood, B. M. & Gilchrist, I. D. (2010) Probabilistic cuing in large-scale environmental search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
36(3):605–18.Google ScholarPubMed
Theeuwes, J. (1994) Stimulus driven capture and attentional set – Selective search for colour and visual abrupt onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
20(4):799–806.Google ScholarPubMed
Yantis, S. & Jonides, J. (1984) Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
10(5):601–21.Google ScholarPubMed
Target article
Navigating in a three-dimensional world
Related commentaries (32)
Anisotropy and polarization of space: Evidence from naïve optics and phenomenological psychophysics
Applying the bicoded spatial model to nonhuman primates in an arboreal multilayer environment
Are all types of vertical information created equal?
Augmented topological maps for three-dimensional navigation
Development of human spatial cognition in a three-dimensional world
Does evidence from ethology support bicoded cognitive maps?
Foreshortening affects both uphill and downhill slope perception at far distances
Grid maps for spaceflight, anyone? They are for free!
Has a fully three-dimensional space map never evolved in any species? A comparative imperative for studies of spatial cognition
Human path navigation in a three-dimensional world
Just the tip of the iceberg: The bicoded map is but one instantiation of scalable spatial representation structures
Learning landmarks and routes in multi-floored buildings
Learning to navigate in a three-dimensional world: From bees to primates
Making a stronger case for comparative research to investigate the behavioral and neurological bases of three-dimensional navigation
Map fragmentation in two- and three-dimensional environments
Monkeys in space: Primate neural data suggest volumetric representations
Multi-floor buildings and human wayfinding cognition
Navigating in a volumetric world: Metric encoding in the vertical axis of space
Navigating through a volumetric world does not imply needing a full three-dimensional representation
Navigation bicoded as functions of x-y and time?
Perceptual experience as a bridge between the retina and a bicoded cognitive map
Semantic sides of three-dimensional space representation
Spatial language as a window on representations of three-dimensional space
The complex interplay between three-dimensional egocentric and allocentric spatial representation
The planar mosaic fails to account for spatially directed action
The problem of conflicting reference frames when investigating three-dimensional space in surface-dwelling animals
The study of blindness and technology can reveal the mechanisms of three-dimensional navigation
Think local, act global: How do fragmented representations of space allow seamless navigation?
Vertical and veridical – 2.5-dimensional visual and vestibular navigation
What counts as the evidence for three-dimensional and four-dimensional spatial representations?
What is optimized in an optimal path?
Which animal model for understanding human navigation in a three-dimensional world?
Author response
A framework for three-dimensional navigation research