Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:52:22.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The implications of the cultural evolution of heritability for evolutionary psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2022

Timothy P. Racine Open the ORCID record for Timothy P. Racine [Opens in a new window]
Timothy P. Racine*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada. tracine@sfu.cahttps://www.sfu.ca/psychology/about/people/profiles/tracine.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Uchiyama et al. provide a compelling analysis of cultural influences on estimates of the genetic contribution to psychological and behavioral traits. Their focus is on the relevance of their arguments for behavioral genetics and their work resonates with other contemporary approaches that emphasize extra-genetic influences on phenotype. I extend their analysis to consider its relevance for evolutionary psychology.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e173
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Apicella, C., Norenzayan, A., & Henrich, J. (2020). Beyond WEIRD: A review of the last decade and a look ahead to the global laboratory of the future. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41(5), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.07.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1995). Evolutionary psychology: A new paradigm for psychological science. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0601_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. M. (2020). Evolutionary psychology is a scientific revolution. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 14(4), 316–323. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. J. (2014). Evolution in four dimensions: Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life (2nd ed.). MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, B. K. (2012). Evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo): Past, present, and future. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 5, 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-012-0418-x.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. Penguin.Google Scholar
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1990). On the universality of human nature and the uniqueness of the individual: The role of genetics and adaptation. Journal of Personality, 58(1), 17–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00907.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In Barkow, J., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 19–136). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Witherington, D. E., & Lickliter, R. (2016). Integrating development and evolution in psychological science: Evolutionary developmental psychology, developmental systems, and explanatory pluralism. Human Development, 59(4), 200–234. https://doi.org/10.2307/26765140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar