Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:41:42.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A cultural evolutionary behavior genetics will need a more sophisticated conceptualization of cultural traits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2022

Moin Syed Open the ORCID record for Moin Syed [Opens in a new window]  and
Phuong Linh L. Nguyen
Moin Syed
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. moin@umn.edu; https://cla.umn.edu/about/directory/profile/moin nguy4006@umn.edu; https://nguyenllpsych.github.io/
Phuong Linh L. Nguyen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. moin@umn.edu; https://cla.umn.edu/about/directory/profile/moin nguy4006@umn.edu; https://nguyenllpsych.github.io/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A framework that brings together cultural perspectives and behavior genetics has long been needed. To be successful, however, we need sophistication in the conceptualization of culture. Here, we highlight three imperatives to this end: the need for a clear definition of cultural traits, inclusion of the role of societal power, and recognizing the distinction between traits and characteristic adaptations.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e176
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alford, J. R., Funk, C. L., & Hibbing, J. R. (2005). Are political orientations genetically transmitted?. American Political Science Review, 99(2), 153–167. doi:10.1017/S0003055405051579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, P., & Venaik, S. (2014). The ecological fallacy in national culture research. Organization Studies 35(7), 1063–1086. doi:10.1177/0170840613517602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeYoung, C. G. (2015). Cybernetic Big Five theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 33–58. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelfand, M. J., Raver, J. L., Nishii, L., Leslie, L. M., Lun, J., Lim, B. C., … Yamaguchi, S. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332(6033), 1100–1104. doi:10.1126/science.1197754CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999152XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage.Google Scholar
Kitayama, S., & Park, J. (2021). Is conscientiousness always associated with better health? A U.S.–Japan cross-cultural examination of biological health risk. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(3), 486–498. doi:10.1177/0146167220929824CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. L. (2006). A new big five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61(3), 204–217. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.204CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muthukrishna, M., Bell, A. V., Henrich, J., Curtin, C. M., Gedranovich, A., McInerney, J., & Thue, B. (2020). Beyond western, educated, industrial, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) psychology: Measuring and mapping scales of cultural and psychological distance. Psychological Science, 31(6), 678–701. doi:10.1177/0956797620916782CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nguyen, P. L. L., Syed, M., & McGue, M. (2021). Behavior genetics research on personality: Moving beyond traits to examine characteristic adaptations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15, e12628. doi:10.1111/spc3.12628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tam, V., Patel, N., Turcotte, M., Bossé, Y., Paré, G., & Meyre, D. (2019). Benefits and limitations of genome-wide association studies. Nature Reviews Genetics, 20(8), 467–484. doi:10.1038/s41576-019-0127-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Triandis, H. C. (1996). The psychological measurement of cultural syndromes. American Psychologist, 51(4), 407–415. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.4.407CrossRefGoogle Scholar