Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:54:29.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Understanding cultural clusters: An ethnographic perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2022

Polly Wiessner*
Affiliation:
School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USAwiessner@soft-link.comhttps://shesc.asu.edu/people/pauline-wiessner The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.

Abstract

The cultural evolutionary approach to the dynamics of cumulative culture is insufficient for understanding how culture affects heritability estimates; it ignores the agency of individuals and internal complexity of social groups that drive cultural evolution. Both environmental and social selection need consideration. The WEIRD (western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic) problem has never plagued anthropology: A wealth of ethnography is available for the problem at hand.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ballard, C., Brown, P., Bourke, R. M., & Harwood, T. (Eds.). (2005). The sweet potato in Oceania: A reappraisal (No. 19). University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Barth, F. (1998). Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of culture difference. Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Boehm, C. (2012). Moral origins: The evolution of virtue, altruism, and shame. Soft Skull Press.Google Scholar
Hrdy, S. B. (2016). Development plus social selection in the emergence of “emotionally modern” humans. In C. L. Meehan & A. N. Crittenden (Eds.), Childhood: Origins, Evolution, and Implications (pp. 1144). School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, R. C. (1974). Etoro social structure: A study in structural contradiction. University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Lüpke, F, Stenzel, K, Cabalzar, FD, Chacon, T, da Cruz, A, Franchetto, B, … Storto, L. (2020). Comparing rural multilingualism in Lowland South America and Western Africa. Anthropological Linguistics. https://tuhat.helsinki.fi/ws/files/160501626/Comparing_multilingualism_SA_WA_FINAL2_FL.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesse, R. M. (2007). Runaway social selection for displays of partner value and altruism. Biological Theory, 2(2), 143155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesse, R. M. (2016). Social selection is a powerful explanation for prosociality. Brain, 39, e47.Google ScholarPubMed
Richerson, P., Baldini, R., Bell, A. V., Demps, K., Frost, K., Hillis, V., … Zefferman, M. (2016). Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, e58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summers, B., Lategan, R., Rifkin, F., d'Errico, F., & Garcia-Moreno, R. (nd.) Sun protection from ochre compounds used traditionally by southern African indigenous populations. Sciences, 6(33), 7577–7566. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Riaan-Rifkin/publication/264897272_Sun_protection_from_ochre_used_traditionally_by_southern_African_indigenous_populations/links/53f4e22c0cf22be01c3ef196/Sun-protection-from-ochre-used-traditionally-by-southern-African-indigenous-populations.pdf.Google Scholar
West-Eberhard, M. J. (1979). Sexual selection, social competition, and evolution. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 123(4), 222234.Google Scholar
Wiessner, P. (2020). The role of third parties in norm enforcement in customary courts among the Enga of Papua New Guinea. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(51), 3232032328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiessner, P., & Tumu, A. (1998). Historical vines: Enga networks of exchange, ritual and warfare. Smithsonian Inst Press.Google Scholar
Wrangham, R. W. (2019). Hypotheses for the evolution of reduced reactive aggression in the context of human self-domestication. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed