Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:29:59.633Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interpreting and reinterpreting heritability estimates in educational behavior genetics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2022

Sally A. Larsen Open the ORCID record for Sally A. Larsen [Opens in a new window]
Sally A. Larsen*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia. slarsen3@une.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Interpreting heritability estimates through the lens of cultural evolution presents two broad and interlinking problems for educational behavior genetics. First, the problem of interpreting high heritability of educational phenotypes as indicators of the genetic basis of traits, when these findings also reflect cultural homogeneity. Second, the problem of extrapolating from genetic research findings in education to policy and practice recommendations.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e168
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addey, C. (2017). Golden relics & historical standards: How the OECD is expanding global education governance through PISA for development, Critical Studies in Education, 58(3), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2017.1352006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asbury, K., & Plomin, R. (2014). G is for genes: The impact of genetics on education and achievement. Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Asbury, K., & Wai, J. (2020). Viewing education policy through a genetic lens. Journal of School Choice, 14(2), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2019.1705008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, B., Little, C. W., Olson, R. K., Larsen, S. A., Coventry, W. L., & Weymouth, R. (2020). Comment on Asbury and WAI (2019), “viewing education policy through a genetic lens”. Journal of School Choice, 14(3), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2020.1779577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, B., Olson, R. K., & Samuelsson, S. (2019). Behavior-genetic studies of academic performance in school students: A commentary for professionals in psychology and education. In Kilpatrick, D., Joshi, R. & Wagner, R. (eds), Reading development and difficulties, (pp. 213–232). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26550-2_9.Google Scholar
Chow, B. W.-Y., Ho, C. S.-H., Wong, S. W.-L., Waye, M. M. Y., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2011). Genetic and environmental influences on Chinese language and reading abilities. PLoS ONE, 6(2), e16640. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016640.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coventry, W. L., & Keller, M. C. (2005). The extent of parameter bias in the classical twin design: A comparison of parameter estimates from the extended twin-family and classical twin designs. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 8(3), 214–223. https://doi.org/10.1375/twin.8.3.214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harden, K. P. (2021). “Reports of my death were greatly exaggerated”: Behavior genetics in the postgenomic era. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 37–60. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-052220-103822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, M. C., & Coventry, W. L. (2005). Quantifying and addressing parameter indeterminacy in the classical twin design. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 8(3), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1375/twin.8.3.201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kovas, Y., Tikhomirova, T. N., Selita, F., Tosto, M. G., & Malykh, S. B. (2016). How genetics can help education. In Kovas, Y., Malykh, S. B., & Gaysina, D. (Eds.), Behavioural genetics for education (pp. 1–23). Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Panofsky, A. (2015). What does behavioral genetics offer for improving education? The Genetics of Intelligence: Ethics and the Conduct of Trustworthy Research, (Hastings Center Report, 45, no. 5), S43–S49. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., Knopik, V. S., & Neiderhiser, J. M. (2013). Behavioral genetics (6th ed.). Worth.Google Scholar
Rose, J. (2006). Independent review of the teaching of early reading: Final report. (Department for Education and Skills Report). Retrieved from https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/5551/.Google Scholar
Shero, J., van Dijk, W., Edwards, A., Schatschneider, C., Solari, E. J., & Hart, S. A. (2021). The practical utility of genetic screening in school settings. Npj Science of Learning, 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-021-00090-y.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, G. D. (2011). Epidemiology, epigenetics and the “gloomy prospect”: Embracing randomness in population health research and practice. International Journal of Epidemiology, 40(3), 537–562. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyr117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanovich, P. J., & Stanovich, K. E. (2003). Using research and reason in education. (National Institute for Literacy Report). Retrieved from https://lincs.ed.gov/publications/pdf/Stanovich_Color.pdf.Google Scholar
Thomson, S., Hillman, K., Schmid, M., Rodrigues, S., & Fullarton, J. (2017). Reporting Australia's Results: PIRLS 2016. Camberwell, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research. Retrieved from https://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=pirls.Google Scholar
Turkheimer, E. (2015), Genetic prediction. Hastings Center Report, 45, S32–S38. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vadeboncoeur, J. A. (1997). Child development and the purpose of education: A historical context for constructivism in teacher education. In Richardson, V. (Ed.), Constructivist teacher education: Building New understandings (pp. 15–37). The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Woods, A. (2021). Are we there yet? Research with and for teachers and children and the possibilities of schooling in a complex world. The Australian Educational Researcher, 48(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-021-00431-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar