We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Anxiety disorders are common mental health problems and include panic disorder, generalised anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and obsessive compulsive disorder. The chapter presents an overview of the condition, the treatments and medication available, and their relevance to people with intellectual disability.
Panic disorder is a type of anxiety disorder characterized by recurring and unexpected panic attacks. Panic attacks are periods of intense and overwhelming fear that can be accompanied by physical symptoms such as rapid heartbeat, chest pain, dizziness, shortness of breath, tremors, and sweating. Pharmacologic treatment options for those with panic disorder can include a short course of benzodiazepines and long-term SSRIs or SNRIs. Cognitive behavioral therapy has proven to be a particularly effective nonpharmacologic approach to treatment of anxiety and panic. Benzodiazepines are recommended for short-term acute treatment of panic disorder. The effects of benzodiazepines on decreasing the severity and frequency of panic symptoms can be seen in as little as days to weeks. They are especially helpful as long-term therapies may take weeks to months for full benefit to be realized. A scheduled dosing is preferred over as-needed dosing.
Scientific literature has highlighted the link between autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and anxiety disorders, but few studies have delved into the relationship between ASD and panic-agoraphobic disorders. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between autism spectrum and panic-agoraphobic symptoms, examining whether and which autistic domains are predictive of the presence of specific panic-agoraphobic symptoms.
Materials and methods
Forty-five adult subjects with ASD and 50 healthy controls (HCs) were evaluated through the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5, Research Version and assessed with the Adult Autism Subthreshold Spectrum (AdAS Spectrum) and the Panic-Agoraphobic – Short Version (PAS-SV) questionnaires. Statistical analyses included Mann–Whitney U test, chi-square test, and a set of linear and logistic regression analyses.
Results
The PAS-SV total and domain scores were significantly higher in the ASD group than in the HC group. A higher AdAS total score appeared to be predictive of a higher PAS-SV total score. The AdAS domain Restricted Interests and Rumination would increase the risk of obtaining higher PAS-SV total and domain scores. Conversely, the AdAS Spectrum domain Inflexibility and Adherence to Routine would predict lower total PAS-SV score.
Conclusion
This study revealed a greater representation of panic-agoraphobic symptoms in adults with ASD, as well as an increased risk of showing such symptoms in the presence of significant autistic traits. Restricted interests and ruminative thinking emerged as predominant risk factors for panic-agoraphobic manifestations.
Edited by
Nevena V. Radonjić, State University of New York Upstate Medical University,Thomas L. Schwartz, State University of New York Upstate Medical University,Stephen M. Stahl, University of California, San Diego
Edited by
David Kingdon, University of Southampton,Paul Rowlands, Derbyshire Healthcare NHS foundation Trust,George Stein, Emeritus of the Princess Royal University Hospital
Anxiety symptoms and anxiety disorders are common in community settings and primary and secondary medical care. Anxiety symptoms are often mild and only transient, but many people are troubled by severe symptoms that cause both considerable personal distress and a marked impairment in social and occupational function. The principal anxiety disorders are currently considered to comprise panic disorder, generalised anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, agoraphobia, specific phobias, separation anxiety disorder and selective mutism. Additional conditions (not considered further here) include substance/medication-induced anxiety disorder, anxiety disorder due to another medical condition, other specified anxiety disorder and unspecified anxiety disorder. Together, anxiety disorders constitute the most frequent mental disorders, with an estimated 12-month prevalence of approximately 10–14 per cent.
Although the societal impact of anxiety disorders is substantial, many of those who could benefit from psychological or pharmacological treatment are neither recognised nor treated. Recognition relies on maintaining a keen awareness of the psychological and physical symptoms of anxiety disorders, and accurate diagnosis rests on identifying the pathognomonic features of specific conditions.
Edited by
Andrea Fiorillo, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, Naples,Peter Falkai, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München,Philip Gorwood, Sainte-Anne Hospital, Paris
Anxiety Disorders (ADs) are the most prevalent mental disorders worldwide and are characterized by a wide variety of psychological and somatic symptoms, which are often misinterpreted as symptoms of a medical condition. ADs carry a large disease burden that impacts negatively on patients’ health-related quality of life and global life satisfaction and disrupts important activities of daily living. In this chapter we analyze the epidemiology and clinical presentation of ADs, highlighting recent innovations and changes in the classification of anxiety disorders in DSM-5 and ICD-11. Main available pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapies for the treatment of ADs, based on the most recent clinical evidence and updated literature, are presented as well. Lastly, we focus the attention on future perspectives about ADs, examining clinical correlations of peripheral biomarkers, neuroimaging, genetics, epigenetics, and microbiota data. These features may be useful to achieve further insight in terms of physiopathology, to support early diagnosis, and to facilitate the prediction of illness susceptibility and treatment response, in order to support clinicians’ practice and to develop personalized treatment strategies.
This chapter provides the rationale and background of interoceptive exposure exercises, the body investigations parents and children (and possibly healthcare providers) will perform in each session. The origins of these exercises in the treatment of panic disorder will be reviewed, while introducing key developmental considerations and explaining the importance of an acceptance-based framework. In brief, in the context of panic disorder, interoceptive exposure exercises were intended to provoke a sensation that was feared and to provide new learning that this experience is not dangerous - new learning that competes with prior beliefs of harm or threat. One of the strengths of the FBI approach is that it uses sensations rather than cognitions as a framework for learning. This is essential for children who often do not have access to the content and meaning of their thoughts, or the language to articulate them with insight. As children do not have well-formed beliefs about threats, body exposure investigations are designed to help children learn how smart and trustworthy their bodies are –experiences that may directly contrast with their prior ones of weakness and vulnerability.
Sudden gains occur in a range of disorders and treatments and are of clinical and theoretical significance if they can shed light on therapeutic change processes. This study investigated the relationship between sudden gains in panic symptoms and preceding cognitive change during cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for panic disorder.
Method:
Participants with panic disorder completed in session measures of panic symptoms and catastrophic cognitions. Independent samples t-tests were used to compare the post-treatment score of those who met criteria for one or more sudden gain during treatment with those who did not, and to compare within-session cognitive change between pre-sudden gain sessions and the previous (control) session.
Results:
Twenty-two (42%) of 53 participants experienced a sudden gain during treatment. Participants demonstrating a sudden gain showed more improvement in panic symptoms from pre- to post-treatment than those without a sudden gain. The within-session cognitive change score in the pre-gain session was significantly greater than in the control session.
Conclusions:
Sudden gains occurred in individual CBT for panic disorder and within-session cognitive change was associated with sudden gains. This is consistent with the cognitive model of panic disorder and highlights how sudden gains can help to identify key change processes.
Distinguishes between adaptive and maladaptive anxiety. Describes the essential features of, and models and treatments for, panic attacks and panic disorder. Describes the essential features of, and models and treatments for, phobias. Describes the essential features of, and models and treatments for, generalized anxiety disorder. Describes the essential features of, and models and treatments for, obsessive-compulsive and related disorders.
Several in-person and remote delivery formats of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) for panic disorder are available, but up-to-date and comprehensive evidence on their comparative efficacy and acceptability is lacking. Our aim was to evaluate the comparative efficacy and acceptability of all CBT delivery formats to treat panic disorder. To answer our question we performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and CENTRAL, from inception to 1st January 2022. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA). The protocol was published in a peer-reviewed journal and in PROSPERO. We found a total of 74 trials with 6699 participants. Evidence suggests that face-to-face group [standardised mean differences (s.m.d.) −0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.87 to −0.07; CINeMA = moderate], face-to-face individual (s.m.d. −0.43, 95% CI −0.70 to −0.15; CINeMA = Moderate), and guided self-help (SMD −0.42, 95% CI −0.77 to −0.07; CINeMA = low), are superior to treatment as usual in terms of efficacy, whilst unguided self-help is not (SMD −0.21, 95% CI −0.58 to −0.16; CINeMA = low). In terms of acceptability (i.e. all-cause discontinuation from the trial) CBT delivery formats did not differ significantly from each other. Our findings are clear in that there are no efficacy differences between CBT delivered as guided self-help, or in the face-to-face individual or group format in the treatment of panic disorder. No CBT delivery format provided high confidence in the evidence at the CINeMA evaluation.
The self-report version of the Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS-SR) is a reliable and valid instrument to assess panic disorder, but is unavailable in French.
Objectives
The aim of this study was to conduct a transcultural validation of the French-Canadian PDSS-SR and examine its psychometric properties.
Methods
This study is part of a pragmatic RCT of group transdiagnostic CBT for anxiety disorders, and includes 272 adults meeting DSM-5 panic disorder diagnostic criteria. At baseline, participants completed the Anxiety and Related Disorders Interview Schedule (ADIS-5), the French-Canadian PDSS-SR and self-report measures. Convergent validity was assessed with Spearman correlations, Cronbach’s α was used to analyse internal consistency, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) evaluated its factor structure. Sensitivity to change was assessed with paired sample t-tests in patients (n = 72) meeting DSM-5 criteria for panic disorder at baseline with posttreatment data.
Results
108 patients met DSM-5 criteria for panic disorder, including 58 with agoraphobia. The majority were women (85.3%) and mean age was 37.1 (SD = 12.4). Internal consistency (Cronbach’s α) was 0.91. For convergent validity, the highest correlation was with the Beck Anxiety Inventory (r = 0.64). CFA suggested a two-factor model. Optimal threshold for probable diagnosis was 10. Analyses support sensitivity to change when comparing transdiagnostic group CBT and control conditions.
Conclusions
With its good psychometric properties in primary care patients, the French-Canadian self-report version of the Panic Disorder Severity Scale is an efficient and practical instrument for both clinicians and researchers working in the field of mental health.
Even though cognitive behavior therapy is proven to be an effective treatment for panic disorder, the scarcity of psychiatrists cause many patients not to get a sufficient therapy. E-mental health applications are being developed to address this shortage, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic. However, none of the e-mental health applications developed so far has offered a structured cognitive behavioral therapy.
Objectives
We are developing a mobile application which will integrate with psychiatric interventions that aims to make cognitive behavioral therapy more accessible.
Methods
Our algorithm consists of multiple choice questions and answers to determine the progression of the algorithm. The first three sessions consist of psycho-education of the application and the cognitive therapy model of panic mostly. During the psycho-education sessions, patients’ symptoms during panic attacks and their catastrophic thoughts will be questioned to be used in following sessions. After the panic log has been introduced in the third session, patients will enter the details of their panic attacks right after they experience it and this information will be investigated in the following sessions. Progress for the cognitive restructuring will be monitored as the sessions proceed. Later session will also include in-session symptom induction exercises.
Results
We are still on the development phase of the mobile application. Hence we do not have any data to present at the moment.
Conclusions
Our main purpose is to develop a mobile application which will integrate with structured cognitive behavioral therapy process, reduce the workload of the therapist and is easily accessible through the smart phones.
Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD), a severe form of premenstrual syndrome (PMS), affects 3-5% of the women of childbearing age. According to scientific literature, the prevalence of PMDD increases with age and among the psychiatric patient population as well, e.g. in women suffering depressive disorder (DD) or panic disorder (PD).
Objectives
To estimate the prevalence of PMDD in women without psychiatric comorbidities and those with concomitant DD or PD.
Methods
A cross-sectional non-interventional study that enrolled 159 women, divided in 3 groups: 1) 98 women (mean age 31.04 ± 6.31) with PMS and no psychiatric comorbidities; 2) 31 women with PMS and DD (mean age 39.4±7.21); 3) 30 women with PMS and PD (mean age 31.2±7.89). PMS was assessed by the PSST (Premenstrual Symptoms Screening Tool). DD and PD were diagnosed by MINI and a psychiatric evaluation. Descriptive and frequency statistics were performed.
Results
Within the group without comorbidities mild PMS was present in 48% (N=47) of the cases, moderate - in 41,8% (N=41), and in 10,2% (N=10) of the cases PMDD was diagnosed. Within the group with comorbid DD 25,8% (N=8) had mild PMS, 58,1% (N=18) had moderate and 16,1% (N=5) had PMDD. Among the women with comorbid PD 56,7% (N=17) suffered moderate PMS, 43,3% (N=13) - PMDD and no mild cases were documented.
Conclusions
The results demonstrate that comorbid DD or PD increases the prevalence of PMDD. It is considerably more common in patients with PD than those with DD.
Panic disorder is an anxiety disorder where people experience recurrent, unexpected panic attacks. The evidence-based CBT model of panic disorder developed by Clark still remains the dominant treatment for this disorder. This chapter explores some of the theory around panic disorder, looking at the underlying mechanisms that maintain this disorder. It will also provide guidance on assessment and formulation. Evidence-based treatment techniques are presented and direction on how to implement these, as well as strategies to prevent future relapse.
Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for panic disorder with agoraphobia (PDA). However, implementation of some of the procedures involved, particularly in vivo exposure, can be time consuming and taxing for routine health care services. CBT with exposure taking place in virtual reality (VR-CBT) is a more time-efficient option and has shown promising results in the treatment of PDA. However, VR-CBT requires expensive equipment and appropriate virtual environments, which historically has been costly and cumbersome to produce. Thus, access to VR-CBT has been sparse in regular care environments.
Aims:
The aim of this study was to investigate whether VR-CBT using filmed virtual environments produced with a low-cost 360-degree film camera can be a feasible and acceptable treatment for PDA when implemented in a primary care context.
Method:
This was an open feasibility trial with a within-group design, with assessments conducted at pre-test, post-test, and 6-month follow-up. Participants (n = 12) received a 10–12 week treatment programme of VR-CBT and PDA-related symptoms were assessed by the primary outcome measure The Mobility Inventory for Agoraphobia (MIA) and the Panic-Disorder Severity Scale-Self Rated (PDSS-SR).
Results:
The results showed that treatment satisfaction was high and participants were significantly improved on PDA-related measures at post-treatment and at 6-month follow-up with large effect sizes (Cohen’s d range = 1.46–2.82). All 12 participants completed the treatment.
Conclusions:
These findings suggest that VR-CBT with 360-degree video virtual environments delivered to primary care patients with PDA is feasible, acceptable, and potentially efficacious.
Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) increase the risk of mental health difficulties in general, but the link to panic disorder (PD) has received comparatively little attention. There are no data for the magnitudes between ACEs and PD. This systematic review and meta-analysis estimated the overall, as well as the subgroups, odds ratio of having PD in adults who report ACEs, compared to adults who do not.
Methods
The study was pre-registered on PROSPERO [CRD42018111506] and the database was searched in June 2021. In order to overcome the violation of independent assumptions due to multiple estimations from the same samples, we utilized a robust variance estimation model that supports meta-analysis for clustered estimations. Accordingly, an advanced method relaxing the distributional and asymptotic assumptions was used to assess publication bias and sensitivity.
Results
The literature search and screening returned 34 final studies, comprising 192,182 participants. Ninety-six estimations of 20 types of ACEs were extracted. Pooled ORs are: overall 2.2, CI (1.82–2.58), sexual abuse 1.92, CI (1.37–2.46), physical abuse 1.71, CI (1.37–2.05), emotional abuse 1.61, CI (0.868–2.35), emotional neglect 1.53, CI (0.756–2.31), parental alcoholism 1.83, CI (1.24–2.43), and parental separation/loss 1.82, CI (1.14–2.50). No between-group difference was identified by either sociolegal classification (abuse, neglect, household dysfunction) or threat-deprivation dimensions (high on threat, high on deprivation and mixed).
Conclusions
There are links of mild to medium strength between overall ACEs and PD as well as individual ACEs. The homogeneous effect sizes across ACEs either suggest the effects of ACEs on PD are comparable, or raised the question whether the categorical or dimensional approaches to classifying ACEs are the definitive ways to conceptualize the impact of ACEs on later mental health.
Panic disorder (PD) is a prevalent and impairing anxiety disorder with previous reports suggesting that the longer the condition remains untreated, the greater the likelihood of nonresponse. However, patients with PD may wait for years before receiving a guideline-recommended pharmacological treatment. The widespread prescription of benzodiazepines (BDZ) for managing anxiety symptoms and disorders might delay the administration of pharmacotherapy according to guidelines (eg, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, SSRIs). The present study aimed to determine the mean duration of untreated illness (DUI) in a sample of PD patients, to quantify and compare DUI-SSRI to DUI-BDZ, and to compare findings with those from previous investigations.
Methods
Three hundred and fourteen patients with a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition diagnosis of PD were recruited from an Italian outpatient psychotherapy unit, and epidemiological and clinical variables were retrieved from medical records. Descriptive statistical analyses were undertaken for sociodemographic and clinical variables, Wilcoxon matched-pair signed rank test was applied to compare the distribution of DUI-SSRI vs DUI-BDZ, and Welch’s t test was performed to compare findings with those from previous studies.
Results
The mean DUI-SSRI of the total sample was 64.25 ± 112.74 months, while the mean DUI-BDZ was significantly shorter (35.09 ± 78.62 months; P < 0.0001). A significantly longer DUI-SSRI, compared to findings from previous studies, was also observed.
Conclusions
The present results confirm a substantial delay in implementing adequate pharmacological treatments in patients with PD, and highlight the discrepancy between recommendations from international treatment guidelines and common clinical practice in relation to BDZ prescription.
Psychotherapies are the treatment of choice for panic disorder, but which should be considered as first-line treatment is yet to be substantiated by evidence.
Aims
To examine the most effective and accepted psychotherapy for the acute phase of panic disorder with or without agoraphobia via a network meta-analysis.
Method
We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to examine the most effective and accepted psychotherapy for the acute phase of panic disorder. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo and CENTRAL, from inception to 1 Jan 2021 for RCTs. Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines were used. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA). The protocol was published in a peer-reviewed journal and in PROSPERO (CRD42020206258).
Results
We included 136 RCTs in the systematic review. Taking into consideration efficacy (7352 participants), acceptability (6862 participants) and the CINeMA confidence in evidence appraisal, the best interventions in comparison with treatment as usual (TAU) were cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) (for efficacy: standardised mean differences s.m.d. = −0.67, 95% CI −0.95 to −0.39; CINeMA: moderate; for acceptability: relative risk RR = 1.21, 95% CI −0.94 to 1.56; CINeMA: moderate) and short-term psychodynamic therapy (for efficacy: s.m.d. = −0.61, 95% CI −1.15 to −0.07; CINeMA: low; for acceptability: RR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.54–1.54; CINeMA: moderate). After removing RCTs at high risk of bias only CBT remained more efficacious than TAU.
Conclusions
CBT and short-term psychodynamic therapy are reasonable first-line choices. Studies with high risk of bias tend to inflate the overall efficacy of treatments. Results from this systematic review and network meta-analysis should inform clinicians and guidelines.
Despite frequent benzodiazepine use in anxiety disorders, the trajectory and magnitude of benzodiazepine response and the effects of benzodiazepine potency, lipophilicity, and dose on improvement are unknown.
Methods
We performed a meta-analysis using weekly symptom severity data from randomized, parallel group, placebo-controlled trials of benzodiazepines in adults with anxiety disorders. Response was modeled for the standardized change in continuous measures of anxiety using a Bayesian hierarchical model. Change in anxiety was evaluated as a function of medication, disorder, time, potency, lipophilicity, and standardized dose and compared among benzodiazepines.
Results
Data from 65 trials (73 arms, 7 medications, 7110 patients) were included. In the logarithmic model of response, treatment effects emerged within 1 week of beginning treatment (standardized benzodiazepine-placebo difference = −0.235 ± 0.024, CrI: −0.283 to −0.186, P < .001) and placebo response plateaued at week 4. Doses <6 mg per day (lorazepam equivalents) produced faster and larger improvement than higher doses (P = .039 for low vs medium dose and P = .005 for high vs medium dose) and less lipophilic benzodiazepines (beta = 0.028 ± 0.013, P = .030) produced a greater response over time. Relative to the reference benzodiazepine (lorazepam), clonazepam (beta = −0.217 ± 0.95, P = .021) had a greater trajectory/magnitude of response (other specific benzodiazepines did not statistically differ from lorazepam).
Conclusions
In adults with anxiety disorders, benzodiazepine-related improvement emerges early, and the trajectory and magnitude of improvement is related to dose and lipophilicity. Lower doses and less lipophilic benzodiazepines produce greater improvement.
Depersonalization during panic attacks may be a feature of a subgroup of Panic disorder. Several studies suggest that such subgroup corresponds to a more clinically severe form of Panic Disorder, with earlier onset and a higher rate of comorbidity with other psychiatric disorders, such as obsessive-compulsive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. It is also hypothesized that depersonalization during panic attacks may lead Panic disorder to evolve into Agoraphobia.
Objectives
To present the case report of a patient with severe Agoraphobia, whose only symptom of Panic disorder was depersonalization.
Methods
Description of a case report.
Results
We describe the case of a 20-year-old woman who developed Agoraphobia after a single panic attack, during a physical education class, at the age of 13, with depersonalization symptoms only. After the attack, the patient stopped playing sports and engaging in any kind of activity in the absence of a trusted person. At the age of 20, the patient will only travel alone in the immediacies of her home, sometimes missing classes, because she cannot get a ride from trusted acquaintances. She justifies such avoidances with her fear of feeling depersonalized again. Over the course of her illness, she denied having experienced any other symptoms of a panic attack. She was treated with Paroxetine 40mg daily and cognitive behavioral therapy, having improved.
Conclusions
We believe this case provides good insight into depersonalization in panic attacks, supporting the view that Panic disorder with depersonalization may be a distinct and more severe subgroup of Panic Disorder.