Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:42:46.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effort aversiveness may be functional, but does it reflect opportunity cost?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2013

David Navon*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Haifa, Haifa, 31905, Israel. dnavon@psy.haifa.ac.il

Abstract

Though the aversiveness of effort may indeed serve in selecting tasks for executive attention, the notion that it reflects opportunity costs is questionable: The potency of distractions in real-life situations is not regularly related with the potential benefit from attending to them.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gailliot, M. T. & Baumeister, R. F. (2007) The physiology of willpower: Linking blood glucose to self-control. Personality and Social Psychology Review 11(4):303–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirst, W. & Kalmar, D. (1987) Characterizing attentional resources. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 116:6881.Google Scholar
Navon, D. (1984) Resources – A theoretical soup stone? Psychological Review 91(2):216–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navon, D. (1989) The importance of being visible: On the role of attention in a mind viewed as an anarchic intelligence system. I. Basic tenets. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 1:191213.Google Scholar
Navon, D. & Miller, J. O. (1987) The role of outcome conflict in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 13:435–48.Google Scholar