No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Socioecological factors are linked to changes in prevalence of contempt over time
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 October 2017
Abstract
Gervais & Fessler argue that the perceived legitimacy of contempt has declined over time in the United States, citing evidence of a decrease in the frequency of its use in the American English corpus. We argue that this decline in contempt, as reflected in cultural products, is linked to shifts in key socioecological features previously associated with other forms of cultural change.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017
References
Fincher, C. L. & Thornhill, R. (2012) Parasite-stress promotes in-group assortative sociality: The cases of strong family ties and heightened religiosity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences
35(2):61–79.Google Scholar
Grossmann, I. & Varnum, M. E. W. (2015) Social structure, infectious diseases, disasters, secularism, and cultural change in America. Psychological Science
26:311–24.Google Scholar
Huang, J. Y., Sedlovskaya, A., Ackerman, J. M. & Bargh, J. A. (2011) Immunizing against prejudice effects of disease protection on attitudes toward out-groups. Psychological Science
22(12):1550–56.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. & Welzel, C. (2005) Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leung, A. K. Y. & Cohen, D. (2011) Within- and between-culture variation: Individual differences and the cultural logics of honor, face, and dignity cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
100(3):507–26.Google Scholar
Santos, H. C., Varnum, M. E. W. & Grossmann, I. (2017) Global increases in individualism. Psychological Science. (Online first publication). doi: 10.1177/0956797617700622.Google Scholar
Schaller, M. & Park, J. H. (2011) The behavioral immune system (and why it matters). Current Directions in Psychological Science
20(2):99–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornhill, R. & Fincher, C. L. (2014) The parasite-stress theory of values and sociality. Springer International.Google Scholar
Van de Vliert, E. (2013) Climato-economic habitats support patterns of human needs, stresses, and freedoms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences
36(5):465–80.Google Scholar
Varnum, M. E. W. & Grossmann, I. (2016) Pathogen prevalence is associated with cultural changes in gender equality. Nature Human Behaviour
1: article 0003. (Online publication). doi: 10.1038/s41562-016-0003.Google Scholar
Target article
On the deep structure of social affect: Attitudes, emotions, sentiments, and the case of “contempt”
Related commentaries (26)
A sentimental education: The place of sentiments in personality and social psychology
Above and below the surface: Genetic and cultural factors in the development of values
Affect in social media: The role of audience and the presence of contempt in cyberbullying
Are sentiments subject to selection pressures? The case of oxytocin
Attitude–Scenario–Emotion (ASE) sentiments are superficial
Building a house of sentiment on sand: Epistemological issues with contempt
Constructing contempt
Contempt as the absence of appraisal, not recognition, respect
Contempt – Where the modularity of the mind meets the modularity of the brain?
Contempt, like any other social affect, can be an emotion as well as a sentiment
Deep mechanisms of social affect – Plastic parental brain mechanisms for sensitivity versus contempt
Dominance as a competence domain, and the evolutionary origins of respect and contempt
From disgust to contempt-speech: The nature of contempt on the map of prejudicial emotions
Further implications in analyzing contempt in modern society
How dare you not recognize the role of my contempt? Insight from experimental psychopathology
Including pride and its group-based, relational, and contextual features in theories of contempt
Is humility a sentiment?
On the substantial contribution of “contempt” as a folk affect concept to the history of the European popular institution of charivari
Oxytocin shapes the priorities and neural representations of attitudes and values
Prejudice is a general evaluation, not a specific emotion
Sentiments and the motivational psychology of parental care
Socioecological factors are linked to changes in prevalence of contempt over time
Two kinds of respect for two kinds of contempt: Why contempt can be both a sentiment and an emotion
Warmth and competence as distinct dimensions of value in social emotions
Warmth, competence, and closeness may provide more empirically grounded starts for a theory of sentiments
We need more precise, quantitative models of sentiments
Author response
Seeing the elephant: Parsimony, functionalism, and the emergent design of contempt and other sentiments